JOHNNIE LEE HIGGINS!!!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jun 1, 2002
7,358
14
0
44
#1
Gwen Knapp Archive | E-mail |
Raiders' only good thing worth believing: Higgins
Gwen Knapp

Monday, December 22, 2008


After one of those rare Raiders wins, when they've undergone a startling transformation, it's easy to feel like Charlie Brown, running eagerly to the football, knowing that Lucy always pulls it away at the last second, knowing that he will kick fiercely at nothing and then land flat on his back in the wasted effort.

Any hope produced by the Raiders' October win over the Jets dissolved in four straight losses, and the blowout against Denver last month set up only more demoralization.

All in all, it's healthier to be a non-believer.

So tempting as it might be after Sunday's 27-16 win over Houston to ponder the verve of the younger offensive players, we're going to have to decline. The poise of JaMarcus Russell, who had his best game yet as a pro quarterback? Noted, but not set in stone. Probably not even worth writing in ink.

There is one happy observation that seems relatively safe: Johnnie Lee Higgins is a ridiculously fast, wickedly fun diversion from a dismal season. He scored twice against the Texans, on a 29-yard reception and an 80-yard punt return. He has scored on three returns and three receptions, giving him more touchdowns than any other Raider. He has six of the team's 23 this year, two ahead of runner-up Darren McFadden. In the entire NFL, only Reggie Bush matches Higgins' three scores on punt returns.

The first touchdown was followed by a corny "Carlton" dance, a tribute to the stylings of Will Smith's hopelessly geeky cousin on "The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air." The second touchdown celebration, Higgins explained later, was "the Hooka-Hooka," a dance he described as popular in his native Texas - his way of saying hello to people back home.

Football purists undoubtedly grimace every time, but to those of us on the fence about end-zone dances, Higgins' moves seem wittier than most, too heavy on parody to be patently disrespectful toward opponents. His greatest showmanship, though, is attached to real substance. His explosiveness on the 80-yard punt return would have been stunning to anyone who hadn't seen him before.

"I'm afraid of that man," special-teams colleague Isaiah Ekejiuba said. "I'm afraid of that man."

Imagine how opponents must feel.

Higgins, in his own way, complimented his blockers. "They moved people out of the way for me," he said. "They always tell me: 'Hey, you got to get the kicker.' " Then he lowered his voice like a kid making a confession and said: "And the kicker almost got me."

Higgins' momentum in the game hadn't disappeared when he began his news conference. The man is perpetually on a roll.

Asked what distinguished him as a receiver, he said: "I feel like I'm explosive, like you never know what could happen. 'Oh, it looks like he's down. Oops, he's gone.' "

Told that assistant coach and ex-receiver James Lofton had described him as a 180-pound guy who saw himself as a 250-pounder, he explained that he had played running back in his early teens and said: "I've been a little guy my whole life. ... If I have to run over you, I'll try to run over you. It's who's going to be the biggest bully. You may be the biggest. That doesn't mean you're the hardest."

His devastating speed makes him, in many ways, a classic Al Davis offensive player. But he came to the team as a third-round draft pick, not a Heisman winner or Super Bowl MVP. And, unlike many of his overhyped predecessors, he is producing. He also brings personality to a position that has been moribund in every respect for years.

He has started two games this year, his second in the pros, yet he has the second-highest receiving yardage on the team - 314 on 16 catches, behind Zach Miller's 744 on 54.

Just as important: Higgins plays with exuberance, seemingly immune to the defeatism that this team easily could engender in a young player. Some people might prefer players who take themselves completely seriously, but Higgins seems to know when to be a hard-core athlete and when to be a lighthearted soul.

He showed up at the news conference in enormous sunglasses and gave them to a team official, who promptly put them on. Higgins said he had a huge collection, too big to count: "I came out of the womb like this, with glasses."

Has he ever tried stand-up? "They say I'm not funny. I'm funny looking."

That's just as well. He shouldn't quit his day job.
 
Jan 18, 2008
7,756
2,745
0
43
Rip City
#7
LAKE FOREST, Ill. (AP)—Even as their prospects dwindled the past few weeks, the Chicago Bears insisted 10 wins would be enough to get to the playoffs.

Well, they still have a shot at 10 wins. And they’re not out of the postseason race, either.

So the Bears (8-6) will be playing for more than just pride when Green Bay visits Soldier Field on Monday night, thanks to some huge breaks over the weekend.

The biggest was this: NFC North leader Minnesota losing to Atlanta. That kept the Bears in contention for the division title, although the Vikings hold the tiebreaker. And the wild card remains a possibility after Dallas, Tampa Bay and Philadelphia lost.

Even so, Chicago could win its last two games and still miss the playoffs, according to the Elias Sports Bureau. If that happens?

“I’d consider it that we finished up pretty good,” tight end Desmond Clark said. “I’ll probably look back on it if we don’t make the playoffs, like everybody else is going to do, and say, ‘Woulda, coulda won that Atlanta game; woulda, coulda won that Tampa Bay game. Would have been in the playoffs.’ But at this point right now, my mind frame is the best we can do is 10-6. That would be good enough for me right now.”
ADVERTISEMENT

Usually, that’s good enough to make the playoffs. Only five 10-win teams have missed the postseason since the league instituted the current format in 1990, but to hit that number, the Bears would have to do something they haven’t accomplished since the 2006 Super Bowl season: win more than two in a row.

The Bears are coming off back-to-back wins over Jacksonville and New Orleans and have won three of four since the Packers blasted them 37-3 at Lambeau Field.

Green Bay (5-9), meanwhile, has dropped four in a row since beating Chicago to forge a three-way tie for the NFC North lead, a dramatic fall. It started with a 51-29 pounding by New Orleans and continued with three close losses to Carolina, Houston and Jacksonville. The Packers dropped those games by a total of 11 points and followed a similar pattern in doing it.

Aaron Rodgers would help them build a fourth-quarter lead, only to see a defense that hasn’t met lofty expectations give it away.

“We didn’t make the plays to win them, and that’s the thing we’re dealing with right now,” wide receiver Donald Driver said.

The pass rush has been inconsistent, the run defense ineffective. And injuries have hit as hard as any tackle the Packers have delivered, with Charles Woodson moving from cornerback to safety because of Atari Bigby’s nagging problems. It all explains why a defense that was expected to take the lead with Brett Favre gone ranks 24th overall.

“In the heat of it, you’re supposed to win every game, dominate every game,” defensive end Aaron Kampman said. “That’s the reality, and that’s our mentality. It doesn’t matter who they are or what we do, that’s the kind of mentality we want to have. We just haven’t been able to impose that as much as we’d like, and we’ll obviously be seeking to do that again on Monday night.”

The Packers did just that the last time these teams met.

They held Chicago to 234 yards and racked up 427, while handing the Bears their most lopsided loss, but Kyle Orton is in better shape now than he was that day. Bothered by a sprained ankle that kept him out of the previous game, the Bears’ quarterback threw for just 133 yards and completed just four passes to his wide receivers.

“He couldn’t move at all,” offensive coordinator Ron Turner said. “He couldn’t push off at all. I think his timing right now is so much better.”

For the Bears, time is running out.

They expected to contend for the NFC championship after going 7-9 last season, but they’ve been unable to sustain any momentum. They failed to protect leads in losses to Carolina, Tampa Bay and Atlanta, and now, they could miss the playoffs even if they win their remaining games.

“I think 10-6 is a good record whether you make the playoffs or not,” Orton said. “For our team to be able to get to 10-6 would be a great way to end the season.”
 

PoLLo LoC831

NINER EMPIRE
Mar 20, 2005
4,709
236
0
39
#8
Yeah raidernation, we post any where we want even though we cant surpass 4 wins!!
i told most of this raiders fans before the season started worry about getting more then 4 wins this year, but NOOOO they all said NOPE RAIDERS R GOING to be better then the niners N are going to the playoffs and at the end of the season they will be above 500. i hate to say but I TOLD YOU SO! as a niners fan we still had a losing season, but i'm still good we already have one more win then last season!
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
43
#9
i said the same shit, looking at there schedule before the season started i thought they could get 8 wins but i knew better then that.
 

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
37
#10
I personally never thought we would get the playoffs... my prediction was 7-9... I honestly think if that whole kiffin/al situation didn't go down we could a couple more wins
 
Dec 30, 2003
4,215
120
0
38
#11
I personally never thought we would get the playoffs... my prediction was 7-9... I honestly think if that whole kiffin/al situation didn't go down we could a couple more wins
yea seems like some games a lot of guys didnt even try.... but we did have some dominating wins this year.... broncos texans.... they looked really good those games.... we shut down favre... so watever lets move on to baseball season.. lol
 
Aug 9, 2006
6,298
56
48
36
#17
his problem is that he doesn't know how to run routes properly. that's why he's been stuck doing returns instead of playing at wr.
thats the problem with these small really fast and shifty WR....they didnt really have to practice route running in HS/CFB there physical skills alone got em by...

some of em catch on and become elite WRs like steve smith.....some will make some spectacular catches and be invisible the rest of the season..