Is Robert Gallery a bust?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 2, 2002
3,895
163
0
#3
Why is that funny?

Do 4 games erase the 3 previous “bust” seasons? I don’t know.

Either way…he sure busted as a LT. He was drafted where he was and got paid top dollar to be a LT. So by him playing Guard, in a way…yes, he is a bust.
 
Apr 5, 2003
2,910
20
38
#4
Why everybody gotta be a bust? Some players need more time than others to get use to the pros. Ain't this only his 3rd year? Come back and ask this 5 years from now.
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#5
It's funny because people were on here calling him a bust... now we lead the league in rushing..

No this doesn't erase the 3 previous seasons but he could have been playing out of position.
 
Jun 11, 2007
1,148
4
0
36
#6
Fact is he sucked at Tackle and hes doing a good job at Guard. Bust at his original position yes. After 3 seasons hes finally found a position he can play. He just needs to cut down on the penalties, I don't think he had any vs Miami but the Denver/Cleveland games were bad.
 
Sep 20, 2005
26,038
58,966
113
FUCK YOU
#7
Tony said:
It's funny because people were on here calling him a bust... now we lead the league in rushing..

No this doesn't erase the 3 previous seasons but he could have been playing out of position.
you lead the nfl in rushing cause the 4 teams you played have shitty defenses except the lions which have an alright d
 
May 2, 2002
3,895
163
0
#10
He was obviously playing out of position in the NFL…but LT is the position he’s supposed to be playing.

As for leading the league in rushing…it’s only been 4 games. And look at the rankings (in stopping the run) of the teams you’ve played. The best team, Detroit, is 17th at 114 yards a game.

Cleveland is 30.
Denver is 31
and
Miami is LAST.

3 of the 4 teams you’ve played are at the very bottom in stopping the run. Now…that’s great that you lead the league in rushing after 4 games…but I wouldn’t get all excited just yet.
 
Jun 23, 2002
3,925
1,104
0
#11
^^ Yup and the Raiders got an easy schedule too, i hadnt realized it either...partly due to the fact that the chargers are suckin it up too

next 4 games: at sd, kc, at tenn., houston...easy schedule if u ask me

2nd half of the schedule is a little bit harder but still favorable

im just sayin raiders fans, wait till you play real opposition and wait til after 4 games to try to act like you are right with your 'predictions'...lol
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#14
D.I.R.B said:
and tony, how many threads you gonna make tooting your own horn..its getting old already..
As many as you keep replyin to... sucka! LOL @ "toot" your own horn. Aight grandpa...
 
Jun 11, 2007
1,148
4
0
36
#15
We only face 5 teams this year who had a losing record last year and we faced 3 already. So saying raiders having a easy schedule is a idiotic statement.
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#16
D.I.R.B said:
^^ Yup and the Raiders got an easy schedule too, i hadnt realized it either...partly due to the fact that the chargers are suckin it up too

next 4 games: at sd, kc, at tenn., houston...easy schedule if u ask me

2nd half of the schedule is a little bit harder but still favorable

im just sayin raiders fans, wait till you play real opposition and wait til after 4 games to try to act like you are right with your 'predictions'...lol
Real opposition? You don't consider Denver real opposition? Cleveland? Detroit is 3-1 as we type. You make yourself look stupid with your dumbass replies man...
 
Jun 23, 2002
3,925
1,104
0
#17
^Denver was the only real opposition. They aint tight like they used to be. Same goes for a lot of teams you guys play or are about to. Just because a team was dope last year dont mean they are 'automatically' dope again you 2 dumbfucks. Look at SD, KC is weaker too.

Oh you forgot to mention MIAMI (honest mistake right?) whos terrible.

And I KNOW of all people, YOU aren't callin me out Tony, all anyone has to do is search for your threads/replies to see you're the biggest idiot this sports forum has ever seen! (followed closely by alex but you are still clearly dumber, so dont worry)
 
Jun 23, 2002
3,925
1,104
0
#19
Quick question Tony: So now that Brooks isnt on an NFL team, why do you like the Raiders? Technically you should have no favorite team because your lover Brooks aint playing. If Brooks came to the 9ers (God forbid) would switch to being a 9er fan?

Im just curious..LOL
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#20
Old news...LOL... my favorite qb's now are JaMarcus Russell and Culpepper. I am a Raider fan so deal with it busta.

When fools get owned by Tony they always wanna bring up ol Aaron Brooks....

Is that all you got? Stick around and don't go hidin' in them bushes because I'll be calling you out. I am finna own you and make you my boy!