Is God in your brain?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#1
August 27, 2002
Massimo Pigliucci
Is God in your brain?

Imagine you are about to have a mystical experience. You may be absorbed in prayer in the silence of your room, or perhaps you are meditating and - helped by the lack of distraction to your senses - you are about to experience a feeling of unity with the universe, an experience that will reinforce your conviction that there really is another world out there; that what we call reality is only a pale reflection of the real thing. The question is: what is going on in your brain while all this is happening? Are your mental powers, in fact, allowing you to, at least temporarily, gain a higher view of the universe? Or, is your brain simply malfunctioning under unusual circumstances and playing tricks on you? In the following, I will lay out the evidence as best as we can assess it; by the end of this essay, you may wish to look into this matter more carefully and decide for yourself.
Andrew Newberg and Eugene D'Aquili, two researchers interested in the neurobiology of mystical experiences, carried out an intriguing set of experiments. They asked Buddhist meditators and Franciscan nuns, respectively, to try to achieve a state of deep meditation or prayer while in an isolated room in a laboratory. The subjects were hooked to a computerized scanning machine that could visualize which parts of their brains were unusually active or inactive. The results were very similar in the two cases. For one thing - and not surprisingly - the brains of the meditators and nuns activated areas that are associated with intense concentration: praying or meditating is an intellectual activity that requires effort on the part of the brain. More interestingly, Newberg and D'Aquili saw that another region of the brains of their subjects was going almost completely dead: the posterior superior parietal lobe. This area is known to be in charge of determining the boundaries of one's body, a fundamental task for any living being because it allows us to navigate a complex three-dimensional world with no more accidents than occasionally spilling the coffee.

We know that the posterior superior parietal lobe plays that particular role because there are patients with damage in this same region who literally cannot move around without falling, missing the chair they intended to sit on, and generally having a fuzzy understanding of where their body ends and the rest of the universe begins. It is a truly awful condition, one of many that have taught neurobiologists so much about the inner workings of the human brain.

Now, what is interesting is that Newberg and D'Aquili's subjects described their mystical experience in an uncanny similar way to the reports of brain-damaged patients: they said that, at the peak of their meditation or prayer, they felt ìone with the universe, feeling a dissolution of their bodies into the wholeness of reality. The brain scans supported their interpretation of what was happening: because of the low level of sensorial stimuli (the experiments were being conducted in dark rooms with no sounds) the brain was fed little in the way of information about the outside world and simply shut down the corresponding areas (possibly to save energy: the brain is by far the metabolically most costly organ we have).

The question is: where the Franciscan nuns and Buddhist meditators really accessing an alternate reality, or where they simply experiencing an odd side effect of putting their brains under unusual circumstances?

Michael Persinger is a Canadian neurobiologist who, like Newberg and D'Aquili, is interested in scientifically investigating mystical experiences. He has started out with the known fact that some patients who suffer from seizures in the temporal lobes are subject to auditory or visual hallucinations, which they often interpret as mystical experiences. Some of these patients are convinced that they talked to God and that, as a result, they gain a special "cosmic" insight into reality, consciousness, and the meaning of life. Persinger set out to literally repeat these experiences under controlled laboratory conditions. He built a helmet that causes small, intense, and directed magnetic fields inside the brain to simulate micro-seizures that do not cause any permanent damage. In perfectly Victorian tradition, the good doctor has experimented upon himself and found that magnetically induced seizures in the temporal lobes do indeed generate the same sort of hallucinations and mystical experiences reported by the patients.

Again, what is going on? Is Persinger's helmet a machine that can potentially put everybody in direct contact with God, or does it show that many mystical experiences are in fact caused my seizures, that is by a malfunction of the normal brain circuitry?

Here is where the facts end and the theorizing begins. From the point of view of purely logical possibilities, the faulty-brain-under-unusual-circumstances and the triggered-real-mystical-experiences interpretations are both possible, and we are free to believe whatever fits better with our general outlook on such matters. However, I would argue that by far the simplest and most reasonable explanation of the facts is indeed the naturalistic one (i.e., that we are witnessing a temporary malfunction of the brain triggered by abnormal conditions such as sensorial deprivation or seizures). Why? First, this interpretation fits with all we know about the brain, the phenomenon of hallucinations, and even the natural tendency of human beings to invent explanations when faced with unusual sense data. Second, if God really built that ability in our brains for the purpose of communicating, why did He choose to make it much easier for some individuals and essentially impossible for others to achieve such a state of blessing? Third, it is interesting that different subjects interpret their experiences differently, depending on their cultural background and previous beliefs, again something that fits better with a naturalistic explanation than with the refined plan of a supernatural being.

Either way, you'll have to use your brain to reach a conclusion, but how do you know that you are not having a seizure that is biasing your judgment? Isn't the human brain a wonderful thing to ponder with and about?
 
Nov 17, 2002
2,627
99
48
42
www.facebook.com
#2
^^^^^^^^^^
quote:
"The question is: where the Franciscan nuns and Buddhist meditators really accessing an alternate reality, or were they simply experiencing an odd side effect of putting their brains under unusual circumstances?"



Both, you could say. Why must it be one or the other?

Also, the brain doesn't trick you. Illusion is just another level of reality. And yes, God works through our minds. So in a sense God is in our brains. This does not imply any sort of unreality. Remember, all is mind. There is nothing you perceive outside of mind!
 
Dec 27, 2002
459
1
0
#3
Papers like this are so flawed. What they do not understand is the ingredients of the material universe nor the underlying spiritual reality which breathes life into it. Since papers like this are attempting to claim that naturalistic explanations are sufficient for everything, they start out incomplete and end up incomplete. Why is the origin of nature and the universe beyond the reach of naturalistic explanations? Because it is the supernatural which creates the natural. Unless one understands this, his mind will be engaged in nothing but useless mental speculation.

There is Earth, Water, Air, Fire, Ether. When these five elements are mixed together they are like clay, and they make up our gross body, or outwardly covering.

Then there are the three subtle elements which are Mind, Intelligence, False Ego. These three elements make up our inner or subtle body. Above all these 8 elements exists the soul, which is eternal and unseen by Mind. The individual soul is a spiritual particle emanating from the Supreme Spirit, God.

Scientists attempting to "explain" mysticism is very funny.
 
Dec 27, 2002
459
1
0
#6
n9newunsixx5150 - Thanks mayn, I study the Vedas, which are the oldest writings on earth originally written in Sanskrit. They include the Bhagavad-Gita, Srimad Bhagavatam, Mahabharata, etc. Nothing but transcendental knowledge in there.

Alot of people confuse the Vedas with "Hinduism", but "Hindu" was just a name given to a group of people residing in a particular region, it actually does not describe a "religion".

BaSICCally - Holographic Universe by Michael Talbot? Yeah I read that and it's a good book, he makes a lot of good points and he is describing exactly what the Vedas do, except he does not know what lies outside the universe.

What we perceive as "reality" is actually maya, or illusion. God has an inferior energy (material) and a superior energy (spiritual). Living beings are a combination of both energies. When a person mistakes the material energy for "reality", that is maya. Like a hologram, maya is the appearance of something that is not.
 
Nov 17, 2002
2,627
99
48
42
www.facebook.com
#7
Yes, I have read about all of those. Not too in depth yet. I understand some of the basics. Eventually I will have expanded my knowledge more completely to that. Yeah, I picked up the holographic universe recently and am reading it. It is always good to see another person with such a spiritual sense come onto this forum. Welcome to Siccness........
 
Dec 27, 2002
459
1
0
#8
Thanks for the welcome potna. The Vedas is incredible reading, once a person tastes the nectar of the transcendental knowledge within them, books of fiction and speculation pale by comparison.

If you interested in the Vedas holla and I'll shoot you a fresh copy of the Bhagavad-Gita. You aint never read a book like it. It aint even a thang.

Peace.
 
May 11, 2002
4,039
12
0
44
#9
I have read it. I would have to read it again to give you my true opinion. I read it a long time ago and only once. So I cannot give you my true honest opinion about the reading. Yet I do understand the concepts.

Dang I know I have a copy around my room. I am going to look for it, read it and return......
 
May 11, 2002
4,039
12
0
44
#10
Bhadvad Gita 14: Contacts with matter make us feel heat and cold, pleasure and pain. Arjuna, you must learn to endure fleeting things-they come and go!

I understand.