Iraqi guerilla sniper known as "Juba" saps US morale

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#1
By Rory Carroll
Republished from The Guardian
Commanders weigh their options as 'Juba' notches up more kills

They have never seen Juba. They hear him, but by then it’s too late: a shot rings out and another US soldier slumps dead or wounded.

There is never a follow-up shot, never a chance for US forces to identify the origin, to make the hunter the hunted. He fires once and vanishes.

Juba is the nickname given by American forces to an insurgent sniper operating in southern Baghdad. They do not know his appearance, nationality or real name, but they know and fear his skill.
“He’s good,” said Specialist Travis Burress, 22, a sniper with the 1-64 battalion based in Camp Rustamiyah. “Every time we dismount I’m sure everyone has got him in the back of their minds. He’s a serious threat to us.”

Gun attacks occasionally pepper the battalion’s foot and mounted patrols, but the single crack of what is thought to be a Tobuk sniper rifle inspires particular dread.

Since February, the killing of at least two members of the battalion and the wounding of six more have been attributed to Juba. Some think it is also he that has picked off up to a dozen other soldiers.

In a war marked by sectarian bombings and civilian casualties, Juba is unusual in targeting only coalition troops, a difficult quarry protected by armoured vehicles, body armour and helmets.

He waits for soldiers to dismount, or stand up in a Humvee turret, and aims for gaps in their body armour, the lower spine, ribs or above the chest. He has killed from 200 metres away.

“It was the perfect shot,” the battalion commander, Lt Col Kevin Farrell, said of one incident. “Blew out the spine.

“We have different techniques to try to lure him out, but he is very well trained and very patient. He doesn’t fire a second shot.”

Some in the battalion want marksmen to occupy rooftops overlooking supply routes, Juba’s hunting ground, to try to put him in the cross-hairs.

“It would be a pretty shitty assignment because he’s good,” said Spc Burress. “I think it’s a sniper’s job to get a sniper, and it’d probably take all of us to get him.”

American snipers operate in teams of at least two people, a shooter and a spotter, the latter requiring more experience since he must use complicated formulae to calculate factors such as wind strength and drag coefficients.

Some worry that Juba is on his way to becoming a resistance hero, acclaimed by those Iraqis who distinguish between “good” insurgents, who target only Americans, and “bad” insurgents who harm civilians.

The insurgent grapevine celebrates an incident last June when a four-strong marine scout sniper team was killed in Ramadi, all with shots to the head.

Unlike their opponents, US snipers in Baghdad seldom get to shoot. Typically they hide on rooftops and use thermal imaging and night vision equipment to monitor areas. If there is suspicious activity, they summon aircraft or ground patrols.

“We are professionals. There is a line between a maniac with a gun and a sniper,” said Mike, 31, a corporal with a reconnaissance sniper platoon who did not want to his surname to be used.

He spoke during a 24-hour mission on a roof during which his team ate junk food and urinated into a bottle. During daylight they lay on the ground, immobile, to avoid being seen. “It’s not a glamorous life,” he said.

There was no sign of Juba, who tended to operate further east, but the team spotted mortar flashes and fed the coordinates to base.

Mike said he had shot 14 people in Somalia, three in Afghanistan and one in Iraq. “It’s not like you expect it to be, an emotional high. You just think about the wind, the range, then it’s over with.”

Sniper fire is only one of the threats for an American military that has suffered heavy losses this week.

Yesterday another soldier was killed in Ramadi, west of Baghdad, adding to the 21 who died in attacks on Monday and Wednesday.

Roadside bombs account for most of the lives lost, and the size and design of the explosions has led investigators to conclude that the insurgents are learning bombmaking methods from other terrorist organisations.

Yesterday’s New York Times reported that the techniques used by Hezbollah in Lebanon were increasingly being seen in roadside bombs in Iraq.

An unnamed senior American commander quoted by the paper said bombs using shaped charges closely matched the bombs that Hezbollah used against Israel.

“Our assessment is that they are probably going off to ‘school’ to learn how to make bombs that can destroy armoured vehicles,” he said.
 
Feb 9, 2003
8,398
58
48
50
#3
2-0-Sixx said:
Some worry that Juba is on his way to becoming a resistance hero, acclaimed by those Iraqis who distinguish between “good” insurgents, who target only Americans, and “bad” insurgents who harm civilians.
As opposed to the US Army who shots either.
 

Legman

پراید آش
Nov 5, 2002
7,458
1,948
0
37
#6
^^^Well Certain Ppl Have Certain Ways Of Doin Things, Like They Said, He Aims For Gaps In The Armor, Thats One Sign, And Im Guess Since He Stays South Of Baghdad, Thats Another, And Not To Mention, The Rifle He Uses Is Out Dated, But Very Accurate, Certain Ammo Is Fed Into It, U Know What I Mean?
 

TROLL

Sicc OG
Aug 8, 2003
5,360
22
0
42
#7
i see.. id believe it 100% if they werent all circumstantial..

but regardless thats some crazy shit.. dood/s have to aim for an area half the size of a post it note... from how far??? 200 metres away.


daaaaaamm
 
Sep 28, 2004
1,901
1
0
41
#9
2-0-Sixx said:
Some worry that Juba is on his way to becoming a resistance hero, acclaimed by those Iraqis who distinguish between “good” insurgents, who target only Americans, and “bad” insurgents who harm civilians.
Probably won't get popular by saying this, but it's pretty much a fact that the only thing that makes a hero is the side he or she is on. I am sure that over there, we're not considered heroes. However, if people invaded the US and we had a sniper going after the invaders, we'd also praise him as a hero. People defending their land, their faith, and using any means they can. I feel for the US troops, in the sense that I feel bad that they're stomping around over there when they don't need to be in the line of fire. But I feel worse for the innocents that are suffering because the Troops are there.
 
Oct 3, 2003
125
0
0
37
#13
CannibalCrow said:
Probably won't get popular by saying this, but it's pretty much a fact that the only thing that makes a hero is the side he or she is on. I am sure that over there, we're not considered heroes. However, if people invaded the US and we had a sniper going after the invaders, we'd also praise him as a hero. People defending their land, their faith, and using any means they can. I feel for the US troops, in the sense that I feel bad that they're stomping around over there when they don't need to be in the line of fire. But I feel worse for the innocents that are suffering because the Troops are there.
right on
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#17
Hmm. So I suppose you can say the same about a terrorist who blows himself and civilians to pieces because of his willingness to serve and good intentions.


“I see no difference between the wrong and the wrong, soldiers emptying their clips at children and their moms are just like a desperate motherfucker strapped to a bomb.” -I.T.
 
Apr 8, 2004
1,362
10
0
#18
lol@at the title of the thread... juba saps US morale.. as if they have high morale to beginning with.. i mean of course its cool to be positive but they are over there fighting without a cause, i think that kills all morale right there...im pretty sure there are some mindless drones over there that has had their thought process fucced up, thinkin they are actually fighting for something... that's the sad part
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
69
#19
The difference, 206, is that U.S. troops are not running through Iraq neighborhoods, poppin off "sand n*****s", deliberately targeting civilians with the bloodthirsty intent of murder. Just like I don't believe, after dealing with police and going to jail several times, that police are bloodthirsty killers out to murder minorities for a living.

Most Islamic terrorism is based on a territory dispute over a strip of land the size of the Bay Area and a centuries-old mandate that is incalculable, irreconcilable, and non-negotiable.

Though the US invasion is wrong, and for the wrong reasons, I believe at least the removal of Hussein and some sort of attempt at self-government for the people is a small positive to an overly negative situation. Many of the troops over there do befriend local people. Many of the troops do attempt to build bridges, give candy to kids, stupid shit like that.

To believe that the US presence in Iraq is simply what KleanKut's icon suggests - an American grim reaper - is overly simplistic. Though it is a shortsighted operation born of primarily self-serving goals, just as I believe there is good intent in the heart of many police officers, there is good intent as well in the heart of many soldiers.

Whether or not they hail from the same extremely progressive, liberal environments we do, and whether or not they are able to make a judgement about Iraq being good or bad as an operation, many forfeitted that right when they signed on. Resistance is an option for them, but I can't judge anyone who doesn't take it. To expect KK and other troops to make the same moral judgements I do when in fact, many are not very educated, and many do not come from an environment in any way supportive of anti-war concepts or movements is a bit short-sighted as well.

Many people who sign up for duty honestly wish to protect the American homeland, and their fellow citizens. Whether or not we are actually under attack is another story. But in the mind of many a soldier, the issue is black and white - Hussein, bin Laden, and resistance fighters are all one in the same.