links compiled by Phil Agre from http://dlis.gseis.ucla.edu/people/pagre/rre.html
Iraq
Where the World Stands on Iraq
(hard to see how the war can proceed politically without much more evidence)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/2240570.stm
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/story.jsp?story=331732
Questions for the Commander in Chief on Iraq
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A48684-2002Sep6?language=printer
weirdness of administration infighting over Iraq
(neoconservatives want war even w/o allies, but US and world opinion say no)
http://www.msnbc.com/news/805160.asp
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/2243657.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/breakfast_with_frost/2244613.stm
http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,62401,00.html
confusion over evidence of Iraq's weapons-building
(Bush at one point misrepresented a UN report, but the White House backed off)
http://www.msnbc.com/news/802167.asp
Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction: A Net Assessment
http://www.iiss.org/news-more.php?itemID=88
In Iraqi Kurdistan
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/15688
columns that obnoxiously confuse the point of criticism of "chicken hawks"
(not that they haven't served but that they actively avoided it)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A38443-2002Sep4?language=printer
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A45835-2002Sep6?language=printer
http://www.nhgazette.com/chickenhawks.html
http://www.presentdanger.org/commentary/2002/0209chickenhawks.html
100 Jets Join Attack on Iraq
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...stop.html&secureRefresh=true&_requestid=32726
Iraq
Where the World Stands on Iraq
(hard to see how the war can proceed politically without much more evidence)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/2240570.stm
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/story.jsp?story=331732
Questions for the Commander in Chief on Iraq
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A48684-2002Sep6?language=printer
weirdness of administration infighting over Iraq
(neoconservatives want war even w/o allies, but US and world opinion say no)
http://www.msnbc.com/news/805160.asp
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/2243657.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/breakfast_with_frost/2244613.stm
http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,62401,00.html
confusion over evidence of Iraq's weapons-building
(Bush at one point misrepresented a UN report, but the White House backed off)
http://www.msnbc.com/news/802167.asp
Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction: A Net Assessment
http://www.iiss.org/news-more.php?itemID=88
In Iraqi Kurdistan
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/15688
columns that obnoxiously confuse the point of criticism of "chicken hawks"
(not that they haven't served but that they actively avoided it)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A38443-2002Sep4?language=printer
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A45835-2002Sep6?language=printer
http://www.nhgazette.com/chickenhawks.html
http://www.presentdanger.org/commentary/2002/0209chickenhawks.html
100 Jets Join Attack on Iraq
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...stop.html&secureRefresh=true&_requestid=32726