Iraq has Scuds!!!!!!!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jul 2, 2002
281
0
0
45
#3
I wasnt implying that, but this will further justify the war vs. Iraq

now the fuckin media is backtracking and saying "they may have been SCUDS" man fuck the media :mad:
 
Jul 2, 2002
281
0
0
45
#9
Young Wino - when it comes to this war shit and political stuff Iam an idiot, i dont know shit and Iam not following the war or the politics bullshit, i dont give a fuck cause I didnt vote for Bush lol

i jumped on the "justify the war" cause i wanna cause some ruckus in here, y'all get too deep into this shit, some of you take it personal and belittle people instead of spreading your knowledge, thats one of the reason why I dont post here at all but did today

now i know that this war does and will affect me but what can I do?????????

ABSOLUTELY NOTHING

thats why i will live my life normally not in fear, just regularly, I feel so much for the innocent people that have lost their lives and will lose their lives in wars but i cannot do anything about it, it is out of my hands,


I just think of it this way, while you guys are here going at each other ( antiwar peeps and prowar peeps) innocent people are dying and what can u guys do about it???
 
Feb 28, 2003
151
0
0
#12
B.A.R.T. PATROL said:
wut do u mean 'justify the war' ???

they sent the U.N. into Iraq to search for WDM's, not to gay ass scud missiles.
Acutally 4 y'alls information...it has been confirmed that Iraq fired a Single SCUD missle at our Marines in Kuwait. Along with numerous Al kied missles that they were supposedly destroying. These missles travels farther than the U.N. sanctions allow and was one of the things that the U.N. inspectors were lookin' 4. Saddam denied having ANY SCUD missles, the inspectors couln't find any, and yet one of the first things they do is fire a SCUD missle they aren't supposed 2 have. The Inspectors were there 2 find weapons that Saddam had in violation of U.N. resolutions. Weapons of Mass Destruction were just one, of many types they were lookin' 4. The point is Dude lied bout the weapons he has, and if he lies about a SCUD, what the fucc is 2 stop him from lyin' about nuclear and/or Biological/chemical weapons??
 
Feb 28, 2003
151
0
0
#18
2-0-Sixx said:
Well whats the point? What should they do, just sit there and die?
Come on 20six....what about before all this started, the past 6 months or ten years...they didn't say shit bout no SCUDs. Saddam has continued 2 lie 2 the U.N. and the world long before this war was even threatened. Is it really worth it 2 U 2 not even acknowlegde this very important fact?? I've read your posts and U have more sense than this.
 
Feb 28, 2003
151
0
0
#20
DOES THAT MATTER...QUIT AVOIDING THE IMPLICATIONS OF DECEPTION, NOT MATTER HOW SMALL. IT ONLY TAKES ONE. IF DUDE GASSES OUR TROOPS ONE TIME DOES IT MAKE IT ANY LESS OF A CRIME?? IF U LIE BOUT SOMETHING ONE TIME DOES THAT MAKE IT ANY LESS OF A LIE. YOU'VE CHOSEN 2 DISAGREE REGARDLESS OF THE FACTS...FINE. I AM REALLY SICC OF THIS, BUT WHAT CAN I SAY BOTH SIDES GOT THEIR OWN.