Imperial Hubris Author Quits CIA

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jan 9, 2004
3,340
131
0
42
#1
Nov 11, 2004

CIA Officer Quits to Speak Freely About Problems With Intelligence Community
By Katherine Pfleger Shrader
Associated Press Writer


WASHINGTON (AP) - A senior CIA officer who has become an outspoken critic of the fight on terrorism turned in his resignation this week, citing a desire to speak more freely about problems in the hunt for Osama bin Laden and the debate over intelligence reform.
Current government officials are rarely as vocal as Mike Scheuer, who wrote "Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror." But he called the decision to leave the agency after 22 years "entirely my own."

"I have concluded that there has not been adequate national debate over the nature of the threat posed by Osama bin Laden and the forces he leads and inspires, and the nature and dimensions of intelligence reform needed to address that threat," Scheuer said in a statement sent to reporters Thursday via electronic mail.

Scheuer's CIA assignments included running the bin Laden unit from January 1996 to June 1999. He hopes his experience and views will produce a more substantive debate.

This week, Scheuer ignored agency orders and began granting interviews about shortfalls in the hunt for bin Laden, the findings and recommendations of the Sept. 11 and the intelligence community overall.

During a wide-ranging interview Sunday evening, Scheuer was highly critical of the Sept. 11 Commission's "refusal" to point fingers at senior government officials whose actions contributed to the attacks. Rather than changing the structure of government, as Congress is considering, he said a signal must be sent that people will be held accountable for their actions.

"No one seems to be capable or inclined to find anyone responsible for 9/11," he said.

Scheuer doesn't think the 9/11 attack could have been stopped, but believes the various commissions that have investigated the attack should have better considered whether the intelligence community was working optimally.

For instance, Scheuer finds flaws with the FBI agents who were sent to the CIA to work with the bin Laden unit under his watch. He said the CIA shared information with the agents, but they didn't take it back to their headquarters. He said they were more interested in "travel overseas" and "war stories."

"They were interested in doing everything but work," he said. He could think of only limited exceptions.

Scheuer is also critical of how CIA resources and personnel are now being distributed to go after al-Qaida.

Spokespeople at the CIA and the FBI declined to comment.

Even after his resignation, Scheuer must abide by regulations that govern all former agency employees. He won't be able to discuss classified information, and speeches, books and articles on intelligence subjects will have to be cleared by an agency review board.

AP-ES-11-11-04 1722EST

This story can be found at: http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGBAIQOHF1E.html
 
Jan 9, 2004
3,340
131
0
42
#3
If he talks in 5 word sentences and maybe looks confused at a debate they might just get the gist of what he is talking about. I'm not holding out hope. But if he comes to town on a speaking tour, I know I'm going to be out there taking notes.
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
70
#5
I saw this guy's interview on 20/20...lame choice of questions.

The "liberal media" steered away from his many revelations on the "nature of terror" and asked simplistic, rabble-rousing questions like "Is Osama stronger?" "Will he nuke us?" "You called him a 'great' man. Why?"

They didn't ask "In your book you wrote they don't hate us because of our freedoms. Why?" or "What do you believe we should do to stop or slow the terrorist problem? How can our policies change?"

That would just be way too good of a question for 20/20. Instead they had to harp on: WMD, When can we kill Osama, Does Osama hate George Bush...stupid shit a three year old would ask.