i'm going to say it first..

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 25, 2002
7,804
31
0
37
#4
FaTaL NyGhTmArE said:
didnt see either game, but i heard tha Ninerz did play lyke shyt. but itz preseazon so it doeznt even matter.


i didnt see all of the 9ers.. just caught the end and figured that they played shittty cuz they were down like 30 points.


i guess you can say that.. but preseason does give you an idea of your team, but then again a lot are going to be cut and spend the rest of their lives in the European leagues and shit.. so you have a point
 
May 10, 2002
1,392
0
0
43
#5
Rich Gannons only time in he drove them to the goaline, I know Tim Brown didnt play, did Charles Woodsen play??? There second string quarterback Marcus T. (aint gonna bother to try and spell it) was looken pretty good. There defense was looking shitty but i dont know how many first stringers even played (missed the whole first half).

Preseason sucks ass cuz its a big tease, cant wait for the season to start.
 

AOD

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
768
0
0
41
#6
You can't really tell much from the first preseason game. . .

I'd say the last 2 preseason games are where you can start to tell what kind of a squad you got. I just got done watching the Broncos first preaseason game and the first team offence looked like crap. But the defence was solid all the way through. . .
 
Apr 25, 2002
679
0
0
43
#8
The Raiders should have scored on their first drive. That was a disappointement... Charles Woodson didnt play they didnt want to fuck with that turf toe shit, the Raiders had a lot of good runs but what fucked it up was the penalties, Philip Buchanon had that int in the inzone he gonna get the start over James, guaranteed.