one on one...what would be some of the questions you would ask him...kind of a weak question, but what brought me to this, is i was thinking the other day about the night owen died, he was to face the godfather for the ic strap..i wonder what the outcome was supposed to be, and what was planned from there on, if anything..
IF YOU COULD HAVE A SIT DOWN WITH VINCE..
- Thread starter J-FUNKTION
- Start date
What is the real reason why you screwed Bret? Is it because he was old news, and di not fit in the WWE Attitude Era?
Why didnt you stop the PPV when Owen fell to his death?
I'm sorry sir, but the WWE has been ass since The Rock went to Hollywood, and even when he was there it was mediocre. So I say that to say this, why are you shoving the same wrestlers with the same storylines down our throats for nearly 3 years?
What is your honest opinion of TNA? Would you buy them out if the opportunity presented itself?
Why didnt you stop the PPV when Owen fell to his death?
I'm sorry sir, but the WWE has been ass since The Rock went to Hollywood, and even when he was there it was mediocre. So I say that to say this, why are you shoving the same wrestlers with the same storylines down our throats for nearly 3 years?
What is your honest opinion of TNA? Would you buy them out if the opportunity presented itself?
aight aight...your third question...ive noticed the same shit..what i think, is that vince is tryin to bring back a bit of credibility, like back in the day, we would see the same cats for a few years..tryin to keep titles on guys longer, stuff like that..were old school cats, we were used to seeing each title change hands what..2 to 3 times a year..then they just went haywire with the attitude era, which was good, but i hated the fact that the wrold title changed hands like 15 times in one year..guys like hogan and bret who won it 5 times in the span of 5 to 10 years were considered legends...now you have dudes with 10 tag titles, 5 us, 6 ic, and 7 world titles under their belt within 3 or 4 years..its ridiculous...
or hes just getting old and no one has the nuts to call him out on his bad desicions..
or hes just getting old and no one has the nuts to call him out on his bad desicions..
I would ask Vince: "In your opinion what is a good wrestler?" "Who do you think the best of all time is" "How hard do you push your guys" "What happened the night of Owen's death" "the montreal screwjob" "Why have you lost so many big time names to other companies" "where is the WWE going from here on out" " just to name of few. I know some are very generic, but sometimes they can be the best to ask.
I can not recall the source, so take it for whatever you can verify it for, but
not long after he broke off from Kurt Angles group, they wanted him to take a larger role, but said he was content collecting a six figure income not wanting to apply himself to be the next stone cold or rock.
As far as Vince's top choice, I'm pretty sure he said Stone Cold in an interview. Consider in his words the company was a lot closer to going out of business than anyone realized, and then STONE cold comes and breaks all these records to reach its highest plateau.
Supposedly many within WWE creative are not connected to the world outside of WWE at all times, sometimes bringing up names to bring into the organization they do not even realize are wrestling on TNA television.
