If You Can't Read By 4th Grade, You Go To Jail???

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 25, 2002
4,692
2,577
113
44
Houston
#1
I was talking with a teacher today and she was telling me about this study that they are doing among prison inmates. I guess the common theme that they are finding is that most of them could not read by 4th grade. They are now saying that if you can't read by 4th grade you are most likely going to end up in jail or pregnant as a teenager. What do you think about this?

(And I was told about this, I haven't looked any farther into it yet)
 
Aug 6, 2002
1,637
3
0
42
#2
Well if you can't read by the 4th grade there is a problem. Either a learning problem or laziness. I don't know about going to jail if you can't read by the 4th grade. Maybe the majority of the kids that can't read by the 4th grade have some similar problems at home maybe with there personal life that would affect the way they live, which might lead them in that direction. (jail)
 
May 27, 2002
2,067
2
0
#3
lmao i thought bush made a law saying if you couldnt read youd get locced up from the title of this thread

thank god i was reading bernstein bears when i was 4
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#8
YOuNg WiNo said:
bush didnt win , he got 50,000 less votes than gore , hes a peice of shit like you an should die a horrible death like you
ya and if im not mistaken clinton got less votes than bush SR. but he still won.

its called ELECTORAL COLLEGE and has nothing to do with popular vote shithead

oh and by the way in what way has bush got you all riled up
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#9
Mcleanhatch said:



why is every1 always hating on bush?/
waging war for a dumb reason, is one reason
or
when "Bush failed to follow the law and disclose details of shares he sold when he was a company director." and then
he talks all the shit about being tought on corporations. lol
but none of that is heard, all of the sudden he's talking
about war on iraq, and in columbia
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#12
nefar559 said:
"Bush failed to follow the law and disclose details of shares he sold when he was a company director."
not saying its right but what politian does? look at clinton and to think all the bush haters here look at clinton as if he was a god
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#13
Mcleanhatch said:


not saying its right but what politian does? look at clinton and to think all the bush haters here look at clinton as if he was a god
i just stated why we have bush haters to answer u'r
orginal quesiton.

clinton was a fuck too.
 
May 2, 2002
543
0
0
#14
Mcleanhatch said:


thats what clinton thought about bin ladan when he knew he was dangerous but didnt care to go after him.
Atleast Clinton didn't let thousands of Americans die like bush did. Bush could have prevented the attack on the world trade centers. He stopped the FBI from looking into terrorist activities months before september. It's like he was waiting for it to happen so he could reap the benefits of it. One of the high ups in the FBI actually quit because of this, and became the head of security at the World Trade Center. He was killed on 9/11.
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#15
Mcleanhatch said:

last time i checked exec's from worldcom, inclone, enron, and several other corperations were going down.
when "Bush failed to follow the law and disclose details of shares he sold when he was a company director." and then
he talks all the shit about being tought on corporations. lol
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#17
D-Style said:


Atleast Clinton didn't let thousands of Americans die like bush did.
but he did let hundreds die at the american ambassies in tanzania, africa and on the USS Cole. and how many died or were injured in somalia. and if you wanna blame bush for the WTC you should throw alote of that blame over towards clinton who knew that bin laden was a major threat and behind the above attacks and as we all know the WTC