Hudson to dodgers?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 25, 2002
6,082
2,253
113
46
#2
The story broke in the CC Times, but turns out it wasn't official or expected to be announced yet.

http://oakland.athletics.mlb.com/NA...212&content_id=921387&vkey=news_oak&fext=.jsp

Hudson: Deal to LA not done yet
A's ace says reported trade is 'speculation right now'
By Mychael Urban and Kevin Colligan / MLB.com

ANAHEIM -- The rumored trade of A's ace Tim Hudson to the Los Angeles Dodgers was characterized as a done deal by a Bay Area newspaper on Sunday. Hudson, however, told MLB.com early Sunday morning that he'd received no such news.
Sunday's Contra Costa Times reported that Hudson's agent, Paul Cohen, "confirmed" a trade that would send Hudson to the Dodgers in exchange for right-handed pitcher Edwin Jackson and minor-league infielder Antonio Perez.

"I spoke with an executive from another team, and that's what I've heard," Cohen told the Times. "Until I hear from the principals, that's where we stand."

Hudson laughed when told of the story.

"If Paul has a trade confirmed, he would have called me, and he didn't," Hudson said by phone from his home in Florida. "Look at what he said. That's not confirming anything. All I've heard from Paul is that he's heard the same kind of thing about the Dodgers as he was hearing about the Cardinals earlier in the week."

The Cardinals are among many teams that have been rumored to be in the hunt for Hudson since the Winter Meetings opened Friday.

"It's still all speculation right now," Hudson said. "If a deal was done, I'd know about it, and I haven't heard anything concrete."

Neither team confirmed the deal to MLB.com, and in the Times report, A's spokesman Jim Young said he was not aware a deal had been made. A's general manager Billy Beane was not available for comment.

Beane said on Saturday night that he was closer to a trade than he had been on Friday, but declined to get into specifics. "Today was every bit as productive as yesterday," he said.

Beane also discounted some of the rumors which have swirled around Oakland's Big Three starters -- Hudson, Mark Mulder and Barry Zito -- this offseason. "When you see some of this, a lot of it's wrong," he said.

Hudson, 29, is 92-39 with a 3.30 ERA in his six seasons with the A's. He will be paid $6.75 million next season, the last of a four-year deal. Hudson is seeking a contract extension before the start of the season and is expected to command a four-year deal worth about $50 million.

Earlier this month, Hudson and his agent told the A's he would not return to Oakland if the team did not sign him to an extension before March 1.

Dodgers general manager Paul DePodesta, a former assistant to Beane, has been trying to bolster a pitching staff which currently consists of Brad Penny, Kazuhisa Ishii and Jeff Weaver. Penny was hurt the final two months of the season and Ishii was left off the Dodgers' postseason roster after struggling with consistency.

Odalis Perez was offered arbitration by the Dodgers, but DePodesta said he is confident Perez will accept a multiyear offer elsewhere.

Though he struggled with injuries at Triple-A last season, Jackson, 21, is a highly coveted young fireballer. He is 4-2 in 12 appearances (eight starts) in the Majors.

"The guy's just 21," DePodesta said at the start of the Winter Meetings. "He should be a junior in college and he'd be the first pick in the draft. I'm incredibly high on Edwin. I think he's one of the best pitching prospects in the game."

Perez hit .296 with 22 homers and 88 RBIs at Triple-A Las Vegas last season.

Mychael Urban is a reporter for MLB.com. Kevin Colligan is a regional editor for MLB.com. Reporter Ken Gurnick also contributed. This story was not subject to the approval of Major League Baseball or its clubs.
 
Apr 25, 2002
6,082
2,253
113
46
#5
It's cuz Hudson will be making at least 11 Mil a year when he becomes a free agent next year and the A's won't be able to afford him.

I dunno about that Dodgers deal, I would keep Hudson for the year and let him walk next year if all you're getting is a couple prospects.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#6
first of all, as a dodger fan i would take hudson in a heartbeat even over Randy Johnson (mainly because of AGE), but this is not a done deal yet, as Hudson said. and people shouldnt jump to conclusions.



BAMMER said:
Hudson for Jackson and an infielder???I know Jackson has unlimited potential,but Hudson's a monster.Git rid of Zito.

better something then nothing. dont you think??? Jackson is one the Top 5 pitching prospects in the game. and the infielder is a guy that can steal 30 bases and hit 20-30 HR's while playing 2B.

usctrojan415 said:
^^^after last season, his value has gone down.... that's why they are looking to deal hudson
no it hasnt he is still the same pitcher he has always been. Actually he would be even better in Dodger Stadium as HR's become fly outs in that great pitchers park and he inherits a middle infield like he has never had in C. Izturiz and A. Cora

the reason they are looking to move him is because they cant afford to sign him beyond next year and why not take E. Jackson who happens to be one of the Top Prospects in the Game, wont be 21 until next year, only started pitching at the age of 19, played outfield in HS but was drafted by dodgers as a pitcher (what an eye that scout had!).
 

BAMMER

Siccness Gray Hair
Apr 25, 2002
5,828
479
83
46
Auburn Wa
www.dawgman.com
#8
Mcleanhatch said:
better something then nothing. dont you think??? Jackson is one the Top 5 pitching prospects in the game. and the infielder is a guy that can steal 30 bases and hit 20-30 HR's while playing 2B.
? Hudson is one of baseball's top pitchers.PERIOD.We all know pitching wins championships.You do not trade an All Star "pitcher" for potential.This trade only tells me that Oakland think they can win a World Series with a bottom half payroll.Ain't happening.You can say all you want about prospects,that's all they are....PROSPECTS...Not inning eating all-stars with some of the nastiest movement in the game.
 
Apr 25, 2002
6,082
2,253
113
46
#9
Depending on the trade they might be better off keeping him for the season and getting a draft pick when he walks... It's gonna take more than Jackson and Perez to get Hudson.
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,223
5
38
42
#10
G-Dubb said:
It's cuz Hudson will be making at least 11 Mil a year when he becomes a free agent next year and the A's won't be able to afford him.

I dunno about that Dodgers deal, I would keep Hudson for the year and let him walk next year if all you're getting is a couple prospects.
Yeah, that's how I feel. I'd be sad to see him go. I thought he was the most consistant out of our big 3 last year. But like you said, if they do get rid of one of 'em, let Zito walk...
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#11
BAMMER said:
Mcleanhatch said:
better something then nothing. dont you think??? Jackson is one the Top 5 pitching prospects in the game. and the infielder is a guy that can steal 30 bases and hit 20-30 HR's while playing 2B.
? Hudson is one of baseball's top pitchers.PERIOD.We all know pitching wins championships.You do not trade an All Star "pitcher" for potential.This trade only tells me that Oakland think they can win a World Series with a bottom half payroll.Ain't happening.You can say all you want about prospects,that's all they are....PROSPECTS...Not inning eating all-stars with some of the nastiest movement in the game.
i know what you are saying Bammer but if they dont trade him RIGHT NOW, he walks next season and the A's get NOTHING in return, NOTHING

if you were an A's fan what would you rather have:

let hudson walk and get a supplemental 1st round draft pick next year (supplemental picks are chosen after the first round but before the second round, so your looking at a 1st rounder somewhere in the 31-40th pick range)

or

trade him and get a guy who got called up to the bigs on at 19 years old and beat Randy Johnson 1-0, and who can bring the heat upwards of 95-98 MPH, and a second baseman which Oakland needs that can steal 30_ bases, hit 20+ homers like he did last year in AAA.

its a no brainer. when you are a POOR TEAM you eventually have to let your top players go because you cant afford them. i mean look at Giambi, McGwire, Tejada, Canseco,
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#12
G-Dubb said:
I dunno about that Dodgers deal, I would keep Hudson for the year and let him walk next year if all you're getting is a couple prospects.
Look at what Curt Schilling got the Diamondbacks and tell me that the A's arent getting enough.

the Dodgers are offering the A's more than Boston gave up for Schilling.
 

askG

Sicc OG
Nov 19, 2002
2,178
31
48
#13
i might be mistaken, but i thought i heard on espn that they also might get rid of zito...if the As get rid of their pitchers, how the fuck are they going to keep exiting in the first round, next time they probably wont make any rounds.