How do you view animals?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 1, 2008
141
0
0
35
#4
We should not use vivisection, it is one of the stupidest things we do. The animals we test are too different from us, the human animal. We are animals, dont forget that.
Even in fucking middle school science you learn about controls and all that shit for running experiments. One slight difference in a control, and the experiment proves nothing.

I value non-human animals life more than I value human life.
No non-human animal fucks up this planet like we do. Or at all as far as my knowledge goes.
When you eat a fruit, do you go shit the seeds out into the wild so some new fruit trees will grow?
Probably not, if you do, props to you.
Let me put it this way:
David Mortari threw a puppy off of a cliff.
I would rather throw a human baby off of a cliff than any type of animal. ANY type of animal.
We do nothing for this planet, only ourselves as a species.
http://youtube.com/watch?feature=related&v=rSrIkUXwsNk


Go watch these.
http://opposingdigits.com/vlog/?p=1242
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#8
testing is necessary to advance the human species. without it, most of the great medical advances we have today would not be. It's sad in some cases, but it's controlled; it's a very tiny percentage of specific animals that these tests are performed on and it does not endanger the species as a whole.

With that being said it should be very important to protect wildlife in general
 
Jan 17, 2008
487
0
0
42
#14
I respect all life.

I dont believe in animal testing.
The convicts in prison should be used for that. (Child Molesters and lifers)

I like animals, they have just as much if not more right to be here.
 
Nov 27, 2006
5,648
21
0
36
#15
they are here to be of service to us. Im against animal cruelty but im ok with animal testing for certain products. In no way are animals equal to humans, they should be respected but humans always take precedence over animals.
 
Jan 17, 2008
487
0
0
42
#17
they are here to be of service to us. Im against animal cruelty but im ok with animal testing for certain products. In no way are animals equal to humans, they should be respected but humans always take precedence over animals.
Not all humans. In reality most humans dont deserve to have the breath or heart to live with.
 
Sep 28, 2002
1,124
4
0
#18
I value my dog's life over many people's. I think that the life of last Irish elk was worth more than the ass hole who killed and ate it. Conversely I've participated in animal experimentation.
 
Apr 1, 2008
141
0
0
35
#20
testing is necessary to advance the human species. without it, most of the great medical advances we have today would not be. It's sad in some cases, but it's controlled; it's a very tiny percentage of specific animals that these tests are performed on and it does not endanger the species as a whole.

With that being said it should be very important to protect wildlife in general
Homie, go read about vivisection, watch those movies I posted links to. That shit is a complete scientific fraud, we might even have more advancements than we do now if we had never used vivisection.