Horrible HS rule in CT

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 15, 2002
5,879
8
0
49
#1
I mean, if you're better than a team - you can't help but stomp them

http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/news/story?id=2457707

HARTFORD, Conn. -- High school football coaches in Connecticut will have to be good sports this fall -- or risk a suspension.



The football committee of the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference, which governs high school sports, is adopting a "score management" policy that will suspend coaches whose teams win by more than 50 points.



A rout is considered an unsportsmanlike infraction and the coach of the offending team will be disqualified from coaching the next game, said Tony Mosa, assistant executive director of the Cheshire, Conn.-based conference.



"We were concerned with any coach running up the game. There's no need for it," Mosa said. "This is something that we really have been discussing for the last couple of years. There were a number of games that were played where the difference of scores were 60 points or more. It's not focused on any one particular person."



Some have dubbed it the "Jack Cochran rule," after the New London High football coach, who logged four wins of more than 50 points last year. In New London's 60-0 rout of Tourtelotte/Ellis Tech, Cochran enraged the Tourtelotte bench by calling a timeout just before halftime. Tourtelotte's coach was arrested on breach of peace charges after police say he struck a security guard and an assistant New London coach.



Leo Facchini, New London's athletic director, called it unfair to single out his coach.



Facchini said he and Cochran tried to pull in the reins during New London's 90-0 drubbing of Griswold last season by trying to get both sides and the timekeeper to agree to run a continuous clock.



Some states, including Iowa, continuously run the game clock in the second half if a team has a 35-point lead. The Connecticut committee rejected a similar proposal because members thought it would unfairly cut into backups' playing time.
 
Jun 27, 2005
5,207
0
0
#2
lol thats gay. high school sports NEEDS routs like that so the kids that aint good enough can realize they need to focus on their education and not sports. If you lose by 50+ in a football game or any other game, that should be a wake up call, not some cry baby "give me some sympathy" shit.
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#3
If you have lost by more than 50 and don't want to lose by 50 anymore...SCRAP THE PROGRAM.......Use the money for the education side of things, and make life easier on yourselves!

AWFUL RULE!
 
Apr 16, 2003
14,728
1,359
113
41
google.com
#9
Shit here in cali, If I'm not mistaken CCS rules are in Championship football games, there is no over time or sudden death. You end with a tie of both scores are equal.
 
May 4, 2002
3,312
1
0
47
#10
It's their own fault for not having a running clock rule. It cuts into the backups playing time? If you're already blowing someone out at halftime, the backups are already playing. A running clock assures the dominant team less opportunities to score. Oh yeah, if a team is beating you by 50 pts at halftime, their backups and third stringers are better than anyone on your team. You can forfeit the game too, if you're that big of a sore loser.
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,920
46
48
43
#11
There shouldn't be a written rule on that, but there is some things you shouldn't do when kicking another team's ass.

In high school whenever we got up on a team by like 20 points in hoops, our coach would make us play zone, or man only at a quarter court, but never prohibit us from playing our game, which usually meant running everyone off the court. Its a form of respect not to full court press a team when you are kicking their ass...