Hell In A Cell PPV

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

mrtonguetwista

$$ Deep Pockets $$
Feb 6, 2003
23,473
7,035
0
82
#1
The Wrestling Observer is reporting that the WWE
creative team is not happy with how the Hell in a Cell PPV concept is fleshing out. Creative is reportedly not in favor of there being three Hell in a Cell matches at the PPV, and since blood is not allowed in any of the matches, officials are having a difficult time laying out how the matches will play out.

Additionally, it's being said that the talent is not happy with the concept either, with certain veteran talents upset that there are too many cell matches on the show which will steal focus from one another.

At this point, WWE is toying with the idea of making the Triple Threat US Title match a Ladder Match, however that idea might be scrapped given the fact that they just had a TLC match on PPV and are going to hold a TLC themed PPV in December.
 
Jun 9, 2007
5,122
11
0
#3
I wouldnt mind two Hell in a Cell matches for the PPV, but 3 is a little overboard.... and the no blood shit really takes away ALOT of the effect..

oh well, I'll be watching it for free anyway so I'm not gonna bitch too much.
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
43
#6
thats so gay about them not having blood. Considering hell in a cell has always been my favorite type of match i dont see there being anything wrong with there being 3 of them
 
Feb 8, 2003
22,839
1,850
0
#7
Honestly if theres no blood then tehre is no need for a hell in a cell. I thought the whole purpose of the hell in the cell was to toruture your opponent and make em bleed(nice razor jobs)
 
Jan 18, 2006
14,367
6,557
113
43
#8
honestly i dont care about the blood as long someone is on the top of the cage getting thrown off it or through it.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
#13
For real. I understand that Vince McMahon wants a G-Rated television show, but they should make the PPVs more adult-oriented. That way both groups can win (somewhat). They should just have the announcers keep talking about how it might not be suitable for little kids to watch the PPVs during the weenie ass cable broadcasts.
 
Nov 14, 2002
15,455
537
113
41
#16
I wouldn't be to surprised if they did away with the "pg" rating soon. I know on WWE Classics, they've stopped changing bloody scenes to black and white because so many people complained.

Anyway I'll be streaming that PPV unless someone I know wants to pay for it.
 

GHP

Sicc OG
Jul 21, 2002
16,280
852
113
45
#18
They should have smackdown as the tamer show and keep raw the way it was and turn ECW up a knotch
 
May 31, 2007
3,992
10
0
33
#19
They should have smackdown as the tamer show and keep raw the way it was and turn ECW up a knotch
Agreed. Plus I dont see the reason for buying ECW and turning it into some pusy shit.. I mean I do understand buying it because it was competition. But if Vince was that worried about cvompetition (even though he reigned suoreme) then he should know that the company already had a loyal fanbase. So why buy it then destroy everything it ever was? He coulda bought it and kept the concept and been making bank off someone else idea. Im sure if that was the case ECW fans woulda been accepting of seeing some of the WWE superstars fight in barbed wire rope matches and shit. I know they woudla had to let hella people go other wise the roster to pay would like double but still, there are too many wrestlers getting shit repeated. Variety would be nice. And so would Hardcore matches. When I was little thats all I would watch wrestling for.. Now im stuck buying CZW DVDs
 
Feb 8, 2003
22,839
1,850
0
#20
I wouldn't be to surprised if they did away with the "pg" rating soon. I know on WWE Classics, they've stopped changing bloody scenes to black and white because so many people complained.

Anyway I'll be streaming that PPV unless someone I know wants to pay for it.


I streamed the last 3 lol. imo they didnt have a match worth 40 dollars