Have WHITES/EUROPEANS caused more problems than religion?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 14, 2002
6,278
6,950
0
42
#61
Psilo707 said:
The whole problem imo is that you're generalizing an entire race to a huge extent, and what you're saying is absolutely untrue and almost backwards towards 80-90%+ of the white population as a whole. Yes, the rich do fall into the category, and yes, the politically-powered fall into the category (and most happen to be white). But that doesn't mean you can still point the finger at an entire race and say "you" are the cause for what's happening in the political and social world. I mean, you can, but obviously that's the kind of mind state that has plagued the history of our race in the first place. Generalization is never good and none of what has been said holds true for many white people, including myself and others in this thread.

It just seems like an absolutely useless argument that will spawn no change no matter what you successfully "prove" about it. If you disagree I'd like to hear how any of this conversation helps anything.

In name of all europeans, THANK YOU
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#63
I am the only white european posting in this thread so far and from what I can say how have I been a direct link to any of the problems you have? Or the world has?
Do you capitalize on your white privilege?

I think we can all agree that capitalists in America are the main reason for most problems today. How many white Americans are in touch with their European roots today?
Many claim to be. "Oh I'm Irish" and "Oh my granparents are east german".

From what I understand is that every white American is damn proud to be an American.
Not true, and some whites hate america.

And if they are not they do not go around saying "Actually I am European, but my forefathers moved to the new world so many generations ago" It does not work that way.
Incorrect. And if I heard someone saying, "my forefathers moved to teh new world" I would walk away while they were talking.

You cannot say that ALL (white) Europeans are the cause of most problems in the world today.
Why can't I? People say it about blacks everyday. People say it about religion everyday.

What if you would live in an area in Africa that is torn up between the hooties and tooties, you would still blame a white man for all the killing and raping going on, even when there is not a white(european) for miles in the area. While they instead of helping eachother out to make their continent a better place to live they turn on eachother and kill their fellow (black)men.
Damn right the white man still needs to be blamed. Would there be as much fighting if they were not colonized and fucked off by the french? Would they commit mass murder if other countries would step in and help or if other countries stop manipulating them?

Yes I am white
Yes I am European
I am not religious
I am not a capitalist, infact I am a socialist and not in anyway responsible for any of the world problems today, not more responsible then you as a matter of fact because we both consume and with most things we consume there is extortion involved one way or another (here, in America or another continent), this is also why I choose to be socialist and carefully think about stuff I buy before I do.
Do you capitalize on your white privilege?

Stating that white are the cause of most problems today is really narrow minded, I believe the most problems of today are caused by the rich upper capitalist class, and believe it or not they are not all white!
Who said they were all white? And while it may be narrow minded to you, the claim actually has some validity to it.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#64
HERESY, you seem to be missing the point entirely. It does NOT matter if the majority of the people who are benefiting the most happen to be white or not, they are simply the people who are benefiting more than others at the moment. If China becomes a Capitalist superpower and America's economy collapses within the next 50 years, Chinese people will benefit the most from Capitalism, not white people. You will see the majority of billion and millionaires living in China, not America. You will see the Chinese invading third world countries to steal their natural resources, not America. It is not a system based on race, it is a system based on profit and exploitation. Racism and all that is simply a byproduct.

Modern day capitalism can be traced to europe.
And electronically guided missiles can be traced back to a black man, what's that tell us?

Your god Karl Marx knew this, and why you seek to deny this is beyond me.
When did I ever say it couldn't be traced to europe?

Who are the ruling elite?
The Bourgeoisie.

Are the majority of these people WHITE/EUROPEAN or are they minorities?
Mostly white I'd imagine but refer above.

You are always talking about america does this, america does that, yet when someone points out the roots of america or other post industrialized nations that spread imperialism you want to link it to something else.
No I've always maintained capitalism is the root cause of the worlds problems.

Yet in THIS country and MANY countries where white people are being exploited, the whites who are being exploited STILL make more than there counterparts. Whites STILL have an advantage in the system because regardless of what YOU or ANYONE says, this system is designed to promote WHITE culture and WHITE values.
In America we promote white culture (as well as black culture) but when speaking about Capitalism who most look at it globally, not simply America.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#65
Again, ANYTHING can be used as a tool to control people.
Again, I have always maintained that (organized) religion is used as a tool to control the masses. This is a problem but certainly not the source of the problem.

The majority of wealth in america is controlled by whites. The majority of the worlds wealth is controlled by whites/europeans.
Mainly because the richest nations happen to be white (which will change eventually).

And capitalism benefits whites more than anyone else, but as I said before, some minorities now play the game.
I never said capitalism doesn't benefit whites more than anyone else.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#66
The whole problem imo is that you're generalizing an entire race to a huge extent, and what you're saying is absolutely untrue and almost backwards towards 80-90%+ of the white population as a whole.
Yet you blame religion for many of the worlds problems. If you can do that, I can also blame whites/europeans and their promotion of eurocentrism as an even BIGGER problem. If you can focus on a dynamic ideology that can change overnight, why can't I focus on something static?

Yes, the rich do fall into the category, and yes, the politically-powered fall into the category (and most happen to be white). But that doesn't mean you can still point the finger at an entire race and say "you" are the cause for what's happening in the political and social world.
See above.

I mean, you can, but obviously that's the kind of mind state that has plagued the history of our race in the first place.
Refer to my first response in this post.

Generalization is never good and none of what has been said holds true for many white people, including myself and others in this thread.
If generalization is not good why do you generalize? If what I am saying does not hold true for whites, why are several of the white people here trying to sweep things under the rug? YOU are white correct? If so, YOU are the beneficiary of this system. This system caters to YOUR needs and YOUR culture and NOT the needs of others.

It just seems like an absolutely useless argument that will spawn no change no matter what you successfully "prove" about it. If you disagree I'd like to hear how any of this conversation helps anything.
It helps because it forces people to start looking at things outside of RELIGION and to stop blaming religion for every damn problem this world has ever experienced. It forces members of this board to stop bathing in a sea of hypocrisy and to address issues that have been presented before them. As far as change is concerned, that is up to the individual, and I have learned MANY years ago that it is not my job to change ANYONE except for myself. In addition, I have also learned that even if I COULD change someone, trying to change a white person in america is damn near impossible.
 
May 14, 2002
6,278
6,950
0
42
#67
HERESY said:
Do you capitalize on your white privilege?
I can trufully (sp) say I am not. Weather or not you believe me is up to you since you cannot confirm this claim because you do not know me in person. But you can check that I have never once made even one remotely racist statement on this board.

Many claim to be. "Oh I'm Irish" and "Oh my granparents are east german".



Not true, and some whites hate america.

Because you cannot generalize these statements, like you did in your orriginal post and keep going on about it.
Incorrect. And if I heard someone saying, "my forefathers moved to teh new world" I would walk away while they were talking.
Why walk away? Why not listen to what is on their mind? Seems like generalizing to me, also how can they help it that their forefathers moved to the new world? Just as much as you can held responsible for for being born as a black man in Amerika. You cannot choose the place you are being born, you cannot choose with what colour you are born with, and you cannot choose into which family you are born in, thus you cannot choose your herritage.


Why can't I? People say it about blacks everyday. People say it about religion everyday.
So instead of trying to make a change yourself you steep down to the level of every person who generalizes and go make generalizations of your own which lead to more problems and divedesness (I probably got that word wrong but I am reffering to devide) which eventually leeds to more hate and suffering

Damn right the white man still needs to be blamed. Would there be as much fighting if they were not colonized and fucked off by the french? Would they commit mass murder if other countries would step in and help or if other countries stop manipulating them?
There was fighting in Africa before the white man even knew it existed, what do you want to say with this? The French, Germans, Belgiums, English, Italian and Dutch are LONG gone and instead of rebuilding their countries these Africans keep on killing their own while they could have rebuild their countries and try to make something beautifull.

Do you capitalize on your white privilege?
Like I said, I am socialist, I am not capitalizing anything I have loads of friends who are Marrocan, African, Turkish, from the Antillies, Asian. I judge every person from the actions they take, not the colour of their skin or their herritage.

Who said they were all white? And while it may be narrow minded to you, the claim actually has some validity to it.
The claim would have had some validity to it, if you were not generalizing. But you did and therefore your claim is invalid and far from the truth. I know many white europeans who are socalist or communist and are just as responsible for the world problems as you are being a black American.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#68
nhojsmith said:
this is a very forthright post heresy and i appreciate the humility, this is a strike against those who claim you only speak from ego. so i will give my little opinion for your thread.

you are absolutely right that white/europeans are main benefactor of the social construct of race. when i was in elementary school while my parents were out working hard to provide me with the resources they felt i needed to succeed, i was being brainwashed in school that columbus discovered america and civilized the savages. i was betrayed by the people (teachers) entrusted to guide me. you know this is only the tip of the iceberg in the white mans quest to rewrite history and destroy or manipulate every other races contributions to the world. its ironoic that now what the white man pretends to seek (stability/peace/viable environment) is precisely what he stripped and raped other cultures of to make them "civilized".

we have other examples of this, like the british kindgdom stealing and changing traditional indigenous ceremonies, so that when they conquered people, they could make it appear that their reign was legitimate. we have the white jesus in every grandmas house in america. in washington DC they use white people as slaves in the reenactments of colonial america (i cant help but think that this is to soften the image of slavery, there is surely no shortage of unemployed blacks in DC). Youre also probably right that this constant brain washing and manipulation has driven many people to hate their own races/hate themselves, etc. We are taught that the white man is always right and moral and just. we are taught that god is white. combine this with gentrification, where minority people are forced into substandard living conditions where they are pressured to pray on one another, and we can see how people are led to be afraid to their own people.

but to the question: have whites/europeans caused more problems than religion?

This isnt a yes or no question. In large part white/europeans have been the main driving force behind the judeo christian crusade, so the two sides are bound to one another. christianity as it is practiced and followed IS a white/european construct. Maybe religion isnt the cause of the problems, but the dichotomy of two religions etc. that are incompatible (islam vs. judeo/christian). The answer to the question i would say is yes AND no, until you clarify it a bit more as to what "problems" you speak or, and to who these problems affect. I would bet most white/europeans dont see there domination as a problem...

This is a WORTHY response, and you seem to understand where I am going with this. I will adress you later tonight.

Same thing for you 206.
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
39
#69
HERESY said:
Have WHITES/EUROPEANS or EUROCENTRISM caused more problems than religion? Should it be ok to cite religion as the cause of the worlds problems yet not consider the race/ethnicity of the adherents and how that may be a contributor?

Discuss....
Of course, religion is merely a scapegoat used by white atheists to shift the blame..
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
39
#70
This is why shifting or evading the blame doesn't work.. Say my dad illegally ripped someone off, gave the money to me, and died the next day. By law, when it all comes back around, I am obligated to pay this man or woman back(in full), regardless of whether or not I had anything to do with the wrongs of my father since I have directly reaped the benefits of my father's wrongdoing. This unfortunately applies to all white people who haven't been subjected to misfortune themselves or have reaped the benefits of this country as this country was built (in large part) by the blood and sweat of Africans and Native Americans under the hegemonic domination of whites. Religion and guns don't kill or enslave people, people kill and enslave people(in this case, white people).
 
Jun 27, 2003
2,457
10
0
38
#72
I think white people have been more responsible for the wrongs in this world more so than religion or anything else for sure. First off, Im half white. I was born in Korea to a Korean and a GI that was stationed out there. Just looking at the Korean peninsula, we're divided at the 38th because some white soviets and white Americans decided it'd be a good idea to "share" my people's land. Then, South Korea's been occupied by American forces for over 54 years. Every year we hear about some girl getting raped, or murdered by white Americans. The split between the rich and the poor has become a serious issue in Korea ever since white folks occupied the peninsula. I know some white folk that are cool with me, and I don't think anything bad about them specific folk. However, I think that the white race has committed some horrible atrocities in the world.
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
39
#73
Psilo707 said:
^ I havent enslaved or degraded anybody. Neither did any of my personal ancestors.

The fuck you talkin about?

Calm down my feeble minded friend, I have already provided a comparative scenario for slow-witted individuals such as yourself in order to elaborate, and specified whose burden it was.

Pay close attention to the Bold print:
Me said:
This is why shifting or evading the blame doesn't work.. Say my dad illegally ripped someone off, gave the money to me, and died the next day. By law, when it all comes back around, I am obligated to pay this man or woman back(in full), regardless of whether or not I had anything to do with the wrongs of my father since I have directly reaped the benefits of my father's wrongdoing. This unfortunately applies to all white people who haven't been subjected to misfortune themselves or have reaped the benefits of this country as this country was built (in large part) by the blood and sweat of Africans and Native Americans under the hegemonic domination of whites. Religion and guns don't kill or enslave people, people kill and enslave people(in this case, white people).
 

Psilo707

Complete O.G.
Jun 25, 2002
7,423
62
48
40
Gimcheon, South Korea
www.seoulhunter.com
#74
Um, the difference is, you're related to your father. I have nothing to do with white people who enslaved people back in the day. Not one fucking drop of blood.

How can you even compare the two? I'm not taking the fall for some other human being just because they have the same skin color as me. Thats the exact same thing as these religious people saying "humanity owes Jesus for his salvation and for saving us from our sins".

Its equally as ridiculous.
 
Aug 6, 2006
2,010
0
0
39
#75
Psilo707 said:
Um, the difference is, you're related to your father. I have nothing to do with white people who enslaved people back in the day.
If you're not a descendant of those white people who participated in, or reaped the benefits of slavery and murder, then no one is talking to you.

Not one fucking drop of blood.
If you're not a white American, whose lineage traces back to pre-abolition or prior to wounded knee, then why are you responding?

How can you even compare the two? I'm not taking the fall for some other human being just because they have the same skin color as me. Thats the exact same thing as these religious people saying "humanity owes Jesus for his salvation and for saving us from our sins".
You're not making any sense and haven't even remotely considered what I was trying to convey. If you are the beneficiary of murder and years of free service in a capitalistic, caste-based society, then of course as long as those descendants of the said victims continue to show effects from their ancestor's disposition then conversely the descendants of the said oppressors and murderers are working with "blood money". Revenue has been funneled, and multiplied, and the see saw has never shifted. People are reaping the benefits of the past while others still suffer from it, wrongs haven't been righted, and guiltless, hypocritical whites try and shift responsibility by any means. These are the effects and/or residue of institutionalized white supremacy(conscious or sub-conscious)

Its equally as ridiculous.
Your way of thinking is what's ridiculous..
 
Feb 7, 2006
6,794
229
0
37
#76
Oh white people, if they only knew their history and what they continue to do. Now, if you are a John Brown kinda white, then your down.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#78
I can trufully (sp) say I am not. Weather or not you believe me is up to you since you cannot confirm this claim because you do not know me in person. But you can check that I have never once made even one remotely racist statement on this board.
You making racist statements has nothing to do with what I said. I am asking about white privilege and if you have ever used it to your advantage.

Because you cannot generalize these statements, like you did in your orriginal post and keep going on about it.
This has nothing to do with what you quoted.

Why walk away? Why not listen to what is on their mind?
Because I cue in on key/trigger words, and nine times out of ten when a person uses words like "forefathers" and "new world", the conversation is going to take a nose dive because the person usually ends up promoting heritage and wants to look important.

Seems like generalizing to me, also how can they help it that their forefathers moved to the new world?
This convo is proof of what I am talking about.

Just as much as you can held responsible for for being born as a black man in Amerika. You cannot choose the place you are being born, you cannot choose with what colour you are born with, and you cannot choose into which family you are born in, thus you cannot choose your herritage.
Yes, these are all ascribed at birth and thanks for the Intro to Sociology review. You are failing to grasp the dynamics of what you are saying. In THIS world you are still HELD RESPONSIBLE or EXPECTED TO BEHAVE A CERTAIN WAY if you're born in a certain place, with a certain skin tone, with a certain heritage. This expectation comes from status quo or whoever has a need to protect their interest. What you are failing to grasp is when you are born with white skin and blue eyes, born with a silver spoon in your mouth and born into a prestigious family, you already have an ADVANTAGE over ANYONE else in this world. In this world, whites are the measuring stick, and people around the globe aspire to actually be white or be like whites.

Now you can say, "but whites aren't the only ones born with silver spoons in their mouths", and thats true. However, when a black man is born with a silver spoon in his mouth guess what many whites will view him as? A rich NIGGER or an UPITTY NIGGER who doesn't "know his place". In addition, that black man may also suffer ridicule from the black race and get called TOM or SELL OUT. Now you'll probably say, "but all whites aren't born with silver spoons many are broke", and again this would be true. However, they don't suffer as much rejection from their peers as blacks do. Moreover, white poverty is NOT promoted or shoved down our throats like MINORITY poverty is, and this plays a CRUCIAL role in the perceptions of others who are non-white and non-black.

So instead of trying to make a change yourself you steep down to the level of every person who generalizes and go make generalizations of your own which lead to more problems and divedesness (I probably got that word wrong but I am reffering to devide) which eventually leeds to more hate and suffering
Why not stoop down to their level? If a person does not want to reason and understand logic, you have to go another route. This thread is a PRIME EXAMPLE of that. You have people blaming religion, which is usually INHERITED and part of a persons heritage or culture, for the problems of the world, YET THESE SAME PEOPLE DO NOT WANT TO ADDRESS THE HERITAGE OR CULTURE OF THOSE WHO ADHERE TO RELIGION NOR DO THESE PEOPLE WANT TO ADMIT THAT IF RELIGION DOES CAUSES PROBLEMS, THE MAJORITY OF PERPETRATORS ARE WHITE.

There was fighting in Africa before the white man even knew it existed, what do you want to say with this? The French, Germans, Belgiums, English, Italian and Dutch are LONG gone and instead of rebuilding their countries these Africans keep on killing their own while they could have rebuild their countries and try to make something beautifull.
What do I want to say to this? I want to openly mock you and call you all sorts of names for being absurd, but I'm going to remain civil. Yes, there were wars in Afrika before the white man even knew it existed, but did you have wars were entire civilizations/cultures/tribes were wiped out with no trace of them ever existing?

Here's a list of seven recent wars in Afrika, and if you can find seven wars in Afrika from the earlist date listed in this link that are equal or EXCEED these numbers and have NO white influence, I'll entertain your thought.

http://worldnews.about.com/od/africa/tp/africacivilwar.htm

Now I want you to answer a question: How can you rebuild a country when your infrastructure is broken and you no longer have the ability to obtain the resources on your own land?

Like I said, I am socialist, I am not capitalizing anything I have loads of friends who are Marrocan, African, Turkish, from the Antillies, Asian. I judge every person from the actions they take, not the colour of their skin or their herritage.
You are WHITE first. When people see you they DON'T see a "socialist". In this society you are respected and accepted more than others because of EUROCENTRISM and its influence.

The claim would have had some validity to it, if you were not generalizing. But you did and therefore your claim is invalid and far from the truth. I know many white europeans who are socalist or communist and are just as responsible for the world problems as you are being a black American.
This statement is inadequate and does not deserve an in depth response from me.
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#79
@206

Again, I have always maintained that (organized) religion is used as a tool to control the masses. This is a problem but certainly not the source of the problem.
Again, ANYTHING can be used as a tool to control the masses. In fact, why don't we address how WHITE EDUCATION and EUROCENTRISM controls the masses? Why don't we address how the MEDIA controls the masses? I do NOT understand why several of you are hell bent on focusing on the problems that religion has caused, yet you are failing to address the problems eurocentrism presents to the world (especially minorities in america.)

Mainly because the richest nations happen to be white (which will change eventually).
The richest nations just don't happen to be white. Rich nations don't come about like the big bang, and unless you are "the jews" no god is going to part the clouds and say, "Thou art rich."

I never said capitalism doesn't benefit whites more than anyone else.
Maybe I missed the part where you said it does. :dead:

HERESY, you seem to be missing the point entirely. It does NOT matter if the majority of the people who are benefiting the most happen to be white or not, they are simply the people who are benefiting more than others at the moment.
No YOU are missing the point entirely and it DOES matter if the majority benefiting the most are white. It matters because these people will CONTINUE to protect the "white interest" and "white values" no matter what it takes. These people have an INFLUENCE on the world regardless if you want to accept the fact that EUROCENTRISM is directly linked to the current mode/model of capitalism.

If China becomes a Capitalist superpower and America's economy collapses within the next 50 years, Chinese people will benefit the most from Capitalism, not white people.
Yet the chinese will still be influenced by european values or customs in some shape, form or fashion.

You will see the majority of billion and millionaires living in China, not America. You will see the Chinese invading third world countries to steal their natural resources, not America.
See above.

It is not a system based on race, it is a system based on profit and exploitation. Racism and all that is simply a byproduct.
IF it is a byproduct, it is a byproduct you and others do NOT want to address. BTW, the current form of capitalism is a system based on race. How many european countries are currently being exploited for resources by the governments of europe, north america or the world bank and fema? Not many. How many minority countries are being exploited by these same individuals? :dead:

And electronically guided missiles can be traced back to a black man, what's that tell us?
And the patent rights can be traced to whites. What does THAT tell us?

When did I ever say it couldn't be traced to europe?
You never said it could be traced to europe.

The Bourgeoisie.
From what you yourself have posted the majority of rich are white/european. Also, if we look at the top ten economies of the world, the majority will be white/european, and if we look at the richest people in america the majority will be white/european.

Mostly white I'd imagine but refer above.
You imagine? After you post info where the majority of rich people listed were white/european you imagine?

No I've always maintained capitalism is the root cause of the worlds problems.
Not always. I'm sure if I wasted a day playing detective I could dig up at least one thread where you blamed religion for the problems of the world.

In America we promote white culture (as well as black culture) but when speaking about Capitalism who most look at it globally, not simply America.
This is BULLSHIT and YOU know it. In america WHITE culture is promoted and ACCEPTED while black culture is marketed and REJECTED as a social norm. The black "culture" that is promoted today what does it consist of? Does it consist of exploitation, gold teeth, naked women, big cars, ebonics, drugs, guns, prison stripes and idiocy? Or does the black "culture" promoted in america primarily consist of going to a HBC, owning a business, owning a home, surviving against the odds/overcoming the struggle, providing for your family and keeping your head on straight?

You tell us which one is promoted in america. :dead:
 
Jun 27, 2005
5,207
0
0
#80
I guess you could say that whites have caused more problems than religion, because in addition to creating religion, they have also created other problems too. I don't think its due to them being white, but hell, they were white.