I can trufully (sp) say I am not. Weather or not you believe me is up to you since you cannot confirm this claim because you do not know me in person. But you can check that I have never once made even one remotely racist statement on this board.
You making racist statements has nothing to do with what I said. I am asking about white privilege and if you have ever used it to your advantage.
Because you cannot generalize these statements, like you did in your orriginal post and keep going on about it.
This has nothing to do with what you quoted.
Why walk away? Why not listen to what is on their mind?
Because I cue in on key/trigger words, and nine times out of ten when a person uses words like "forefathers" and "new world", the conversation is going to take a nose dive because the person usually ends up promoting heritage and wants to look important.
Seems like generalizing to me, also how can they help it that their forefathers moved to the new world?
This convo is proof of what I am talking about.
Just as much as you can held responsible for for being born as a black man in Amerika. You cannot choose the place you are being born, you cannot choose with what colour you are born with, and you cannot choose into which family you are born in, thus you cannot choose your herritage.
Yes, these are all ascribed at birth and thanks for the Intro to Sociology review. You are failing to grasp the dynamics of what you are saying. In
THIS world you are still
HELD RESPONSIBLE or
EXPECTED TO BEHAVE A CERTAIN WAY if you're born in a certain place, with a certain skin tone, with a certain heritage. This expectation comes from status quo or whoever has a need to protect their interest. What you are failing to grasp is when you are born with white skin and blue eyes, born with a silver spoon in your mouth and born into a prestigious family, you already have an
ADVANTAGE over
ANYONE else in this world. In this world, whites are the measuring stick, and people around the globe aspire to actually be white or be like whites.
Now you can say, "but whites aren't the only ones born with silver spoons in their mouths", and thats true. However, when a black man is born with a silver spoon in his mouth guess what many whites will view him as? A rich NIGGER or an UPITTY NIGGER who doesn't "know his place". In addition, that black man may also suffer ridicule from the black race and get called TOM or SELL OUT. Now you'll probably say, "but all whites aren't born with silver spoons many are broke", and again this would be true. However, they don't suffer as much rejection from their peers as blacks do. Moreover, white poverty is NOT promoted or shoved down our throats like MINORITY poverty is, and this plays a CRUCIAL role in the perceptions of others who are non-white and non-black.
So instead of trying to make a change yourself you steep down to the level of every person who generalizes and go make generalizations of your own which lead to more problems and divedesness (I probably got that word wrong but I am reffering to devide) which eventually leeds to more hate and suffering
Why not stoop down to their level? If a person does not want to reason and understand logic, you have to go another route. This thread is a PRIME EXAMPLE of that. You have people blaming religion,
which is usually INHERITED and part of a persons heritage or culture, for the problems of the world,
YET THESE SAME PEOPLE DO NOT WANT TO ADDRESS THE HERITAGE OR CULTURE OF THOSE WHO ADHERE TO RELIGION NOR DO THESE PEOPLE WANT TO ADMIT THAT IF RELIGION DOES CAUSES PROBLEMS, THE MAJORITY OF PERPETRATORS ARE WHITE.
There was fighting in Africa before the white man even knew it existed, what do you want to say with this? The French, Germans, Belgiums, English, Italian and Dutch are LONG gone and instead of rebuilding their countries these Africans keep on killing their own while they could have rebuild their countries and try to make something beautifull.
What do I want to say to this? I want to openly mock you and call you all sorts of names for being absurd, but I'm going to remain civil. Yes, there were wars in Afrika before the white man even knew it existed, but did you have wars were entire civilizations/cultures/tribes were wiped out with no trace of them ever existing?
Here's a list of seven recent wars in Afrika, and if you can find seven wars in Afrika from the earlist date listed in this link that are equal or EXCEED these numbers and have NO white influence, I'll entertain your thought.
http://worldnews.about.com/od/africa/tp/africacivilwar.htm
Now I want you to answer a question:
How can you rebuild a country when your infrastructure is broken and you no longer have the ability to obtain the resources on your own land?
Like I said, I am socialist, I am not capitalizing anything I have loads of friends who are Marrocan, African, Turkish, from the Antillies, Asian. I judge every person from the actions they take, not the colour of their skin or their herritage.
You are WHITE
first. When people see you they
DON'T see a "socialist". In this society you are respected and accepted more than others because of EUROCENTRISM and its influence.
The claim would have had some validity to it, if you were not generalizing. But you did and therefore your claim is invalid and far from the truth. I know many white europeans who are socalist or communist and are just as responsible for the world problems as you are being a black American.
This statement is inadequate and does not deserve an in depth response from me.