hahahhah webber is gone

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Apr 25, 2002
2,223
5
38
42
#2
Yeah I don't know why they didn't at least get one big name player...they gotta buncha no name roll playin' scrubbs in return as far as I'm concerned...
 
Oct 9, 2002
482
0
0
41
#4
Now, correct me if im wrong...but isnt this a GOOD thing? Instead of gettin ur hopes all up n choking year in n year out, u now KNOW they suck, so u dont have 2 get all excited come playoff time
 
Nov 23, 2004
184
0
0
#7
king haters laugh all you want....i think this was a good thing to get rid of webber..he cant run with our type of offense....

i bet you well still bang up whover teams yall hatin azz mafuckaz like...


whos your teams????
what they doin to get better????

holla....
 

Tony

Sicc OG
May 15, 2002
13,165
970
113
47
#10
If you're going to trade a player of Webber's calibur at least they could get something in return. Look at how they did with Christie... I don't think it was a good trade. Mobley can shoot but can't play D like Christie. But this has to be a dumb as trade man. Look at the Vikings in the NFL... at least they got something in return. The Kings got nada!
 
Oct 15, 2004
77
0
0
itsronron.com
#12
Yeah the Kingz fucced up. Wit Amare and Phoenix and San Antonio's whole damn team Sac just garaunteed they won't be competitive 'till 2015.

Once Mashburn healz up Philly might step on toez for a couple seasonz, but AI deserved that trade. Maybe now hiz shoulder blades will heal up from damn near a decade of carryin the whole fuccin team