GOM = One of the most hypocritical boards in the HISTORY of the world wide web.
- Thread starter HERESY
- Start date
No one forced you to spend all your spare weekends for the last 3 years googling "Norte XIV" so you could enter any thread even remotely gang related and go "Well William the 2nd St Locos have been around for approximately 14 months give or take a few depending on which website you look at. Apparently their membership has stalled as of late. I've been seeing some Myspace messages indicated they may be expanding to the Western part of the city" and "Ive got the hot word from the street, Messy Marv is officially a blood." "What? You think a white boy cant find this shit out online? What's wrong with that? <- actual quote"
hearsay,
its not that i dont think religious zombies have feelings, its that i know your feelings are prescribed, therefor making you less of an individual than you espouse. attacking you or your disciple stockton is an attempt to attack the religious construct, "system", for which many of us have disdain. the very thing you hinge your life upon i dismiss completely. but ive still learned things from your posts and discussions, so please cleanse your vagina and lets get back to discussing the magic man and blasphemous science.
its not that i dont think religious zombies have feelings, its that i know your feelings are prescribed, therefor making you less of an individual than you espouse. attacking you or your disciple stockton is an attempt to attack the religious construct, "system", for which many of us have disdain. the very thing you hinge your life upon i dismiss completely. but ive still learned things from your posts and discussions, so please cleanse your vagina and lets get back to discussing the magic man and blasphemous science.
HERESY said:
Thats a GOOD WAY to start an introduction...
And I guess you want me to blab on and on about how stockton isn't my disciple blah blah blah.
Hinge your life upon...thats a good one.
Too bad I can't say the same, bud. Patronize someone else.
Did I strike a nerve with you AGAIN? :knockout:
And I guess you want me to blab on and on about how stockton isn't my disciple blah blah blah.
Hinge your life upon...thats a good one.
Too bad I can't say the same, bud. Patronize someone else.
Did I strike a nerve with you AGAIN?
:knockout:
chipper up fella, eternal bliss awaits, you have nothing to fear, us hypocrites will be in hell anyways, theyre all invited to sip margaritas on my houseboat on the lake of fire, you should stop by, its gonna be swell.
Let us not forget the covert hypocrisy that we must ascribe to the "scientific minds" in this quagmire of foolishness. What am I talking about? Several of you absolutely DENY the harms commited "in the name of science" and "in the best interest of humanity" but are QUICK to point out religious zealotry or problems that may have arised from it. You say things such as "religion has caused wars", but you fail to realize that scientists are the ones DEVELOPING the weapons that are USED in wars. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists? What did they do? Simply put up a clock telling you how close you are to a nuclear event?
But it gets much better people. Keep your eye on those who promote science as their living god AND have the "anti-establishment" thing going on. It doesn't matter if they are anti-american, anti "nwo", anti-nato etc. HOW MANY TIMES HAVE YOU SAW THEM CONDEMN THE SCIENTISTS WHO MADE IT POSSIBLE TO DESTROY THE INFRASTRUCTURE OF IRAQ?
ZERO.
But it gets much better people. Keep your eye on those who promote science as their living god AND have the "anti-establishment" thing going on. It doesn't matter if they are anti-american, anti "nwo", anti-nato etc. HOW MANY TIMES HAVE YOU SAW THEM CONDEMN THE SCIENTISTS WHO MADE IT POSSIBLE TO DESTROY THE INFRASTRUCTURE OF IRAQ?
ZERO.
Thats good english, bud. I like it. Kinda reminds me of something a slave or someone who constantly speaks broken english would say.
"Is you is, or is you aint?"
Sure.
Sure you do. For if you didn't, you wouldn't waste your time referring to me as a colic infant and trying to console me. Also, I am glad that you thank Jesus, and I didn't take your remark as sarcasm or an insult. You secretly love Jesus, want him in your life, but are afraid of what your friends will say.
But your opinions were useless, and this reinforces what I've previously said.
No thanks, bud. You guys use too much salt, and besides, I'm a cognac man. But if you have communion wine that will suffice. :x
"Is you is, or is you aint?"
Sure.
Sure you do. For if you didn't, you wouldn't waste your time referring to me as a colic infant and trying to console me. Also, I am glad that you thank Jesus, and I didn't take your remark as sarcasm or an insult. You secretly love Jesus, want him in your life, but are afraid of what your friends will say.
But your opinions were useless, and this reinforces what I've previously said.
No thanks, bud. You guys use too much salt, and besides, I'm a cognac man. But if you have communion wine that will suffice. :x
read again what you write and tell me can you cite any evidence supporting your claims of "crime committed in the name of science"?
the nuclear bomb was made possible by the advancement of physics, but it wasn't Fermi or Einstein who dropped the bombs over Japan, it was Truman that did it
Let's stop developing any science anymore and let's abandon all the contributions science has made to humanity
if it wasn't for science we would all still live in caves
you don't make any sense at all
BTW it is not scientists who develop weapons, it is engineers who do it and there is a slight difference between a scientist and an engineer which I guess your brain isn't able to grasp
Yes. I read what I typed, and I can cite many sources pertaining to the crimes commited in the name of science. Should we start with the scientist of Nazi Germany, or should I direct your attention to the Tuskegee experiment? As far as citing something WITHIN my post the answer is yes. Why don't YOU read what I wrote, come back, and tell us about the guys moving the minute hand on the doomsday clock.
Nor was it the bible that called for people to die in the crusades, but if we leave it up to people such as yourself, you'll rewrite history and tell us religion or the bible actually did it. Son, you are showing your hypocrisy again. You are using the same type of argument one of the other members did recently. This guy wanted to blame america for giving weapons to others and implied that america is partially responsible for the actions caused by said weapons. However, this guy didn't want to accept responsibility for the science community and their involvement in constructing such weapons.
Son, you are making a mockery of morality, and all that is remotely intelligent when you attempt to shift the blame and pretend as if science does not have a helping hand in the madness going on our world.
Hypocrisy showing its face again and a retarded attempt on your part in trying to introduce a fallacy. Lets abandon all the contributions religion has made to humanity and lets wipe it from the face of the earth. Let's forget about all the homeless shelters and food programs operated by churches, let's forget about all the group homes, adoption shelters, battered womens shelters, child abuse recovery facillities and crisis hotlines that are operated by followers of religion.
Which Afrikans lived in caves?
Again, another attempt to introduce a fallacy in hopes of toppling my superior posts. Son, if scientists do not develop weapons, I need you to explain what the CRDF is. Tell us, in what field do the the former russian scientists involved in the current research have experience in.
Read these junior, and please give a CRITICAL response:
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n6p24_Weber.html
http://www.wslfweb.org/abolition/pledge.htm
Nor was it the bible that called for people to die in the crusades, but if we leave it up to people such as yourself, you'll rewrite history and tell us religion or the bible actually did it. Son, you are showing your hypocrisy again. You are using the same type of argument one of the other members did recently. This guy wanted to blame america for giving weapons to others and implied that america is partially responsible for the actions caused by said weapons. However, this guy didn't want to accept responsibility for the science community and their involvement in constructing such weapons.
Son, you are making a mockery of morality, and all that is remotely intelligent when you attempt to shift the blame and pretend as if science does not have a helping hand in the madness going on our world.
Hypocrisy showing its face again and a retarded attempt on your part in trying to introduce a fallacy. Lets abandon all the contributions religion has made to humanity and lets wipe it from the face of the earth. Let's forget about all the homeless shelters and food programs operated by churches, let's forget about all the group homes, adoption shelters, battered womens shelters, child abuse recovery facillities and crisis hotlines that are operated by followers of religion.
Which Afrikans lived in caves?
Again, another attempt to introduce a fallacy in hopes of toppling my superior posts. Son, if scientists do not develop weapons, I need you to explain what the CRDF is. Tell us, in what field do the the former russian scientists involved in the current research have experience in.
Read these junior, and please give a CRITICAL response:
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n6p24_Weber.html
http://www.wslfweb.org/abolition/pledge.htm
you killed yourself with this one - everybody knows why Jews and Arabs hate each other and it's not because they have different SNPs in their genome
I don't see why you should blame science for that, if a given technology is possible, it will be developed, that's what we all progress
how the technology will be used is not decided in the universities
I don't see your point here, if anything, this is written by scientists, not by the church
I don't see why you should blame science for that, if a given technology is possible, it will be developed, that's what we all progress
how the technology will be used is not decided in the universities
I don't see your point here, if anything, this is written by scientists, not by the church
without the scientists in Nazi Germany we would have never know even a fraction of what we know today about the human brain nor would we have such good anatomy books
of course, they went a little bit too far, but they made contributions and advancements that would have never been possible in the fake-moral society we live in today
as far as they did it for the advancement of science, I support them 100%, there are certain experiments that should be made, no matter the cost
in fact, 100 years from now, we will probably still be wondering how the human brain works, because of the lack of good model organism to study it (obviously, there is only one species that's suitable and we're limited in what we can do with it) and we'll still hear "arguments" about how unexplainable the human mind is and how this proves the existence of God when we could learn so much more if just some of the so called "ethical" obstacles were removed
anyway, we're smart enough and we'll figure it out, it will just take more time
as far as the Tuskegee Syphilis Study is concerned - it would have never been possible if it wasn't for racism, and do not pretend racism and christianity are not historically related because they clearly are
it wasn't the Bible but it if there were no bibles and qu'rans there would be no crusades and no jihads
what we're concerned about is that milions of people have died and will die in the future because of wars driven by superstition and myths which is just ridiculous
most scientists spend their whole day in labs or on their desks performing experiments and thinking
I don't see how they cause any trouble by doing so
they do not kill, steal or rape, much less doing so based on religious faith
BTW stop throwing your "morality" in the face of people, morality doesn't mean shit; only real "morals" we have are those that evolved in us as part of the social altruism we have developed; this doesn't mean they're a law or anything, we as a species should be able to adapt to the envrionment, which we're increasingly less able to do
just because your fairy tales book tell you you should do something doesn't mean you really have to, especially when your book is just what it is - a collection of absurdic fairy tales
you're not a kid anymore, it's time to stop believing in Santa Claus and the tooth fairy
religion has not made any contributions to humanity to start with, except for keeping it in dark about the real world around us for millenia, causing countless wars, burning people for being different, wiping out whole civilizations from the face of the earth, etc.
these are great contributions, no sane person can deny that
group homes, adoption shelters, bla-bla - are you kidding me?
first think about why we need these things, then talk nonsense
I showed you a study where they clearly inversely correlated the quality of living in a given country with the number of religious people in it
thnk before you type nonsense
[/QUOTE]
of course, they went a little bit too far, but they made contributions and advancements that would have never been possible in the fake-moral society we live in today
as far as they did it for the advancement of science, I support them 100%, there are certain experiments that should be made, no matter the cost
in fact, 100 years from now, we will probably still be wondering how the human brain works, because of the lack of good model organism to study it (obviously, there is only one species that's suitable and we're limited in what we can do with it) and we'll still hear "arguments" about how unexplainable the human mind is and how this proves the existence of God when we could learn so much more if just some of the so called "ethical" obstacles were removed
anyway, we're smart enough and we'll figure it out, it will just take more time
as far as the Tuskegee Syphilis Study is concerned - it would have never been possible if it wasn't for racism, and do not pretend racism and christianity are not historically related because they clearly are
it wasn't the Bible but it if there were no bibles and qu'rans there would be no crusades and no jihads
what we're concerned about is that milions of people have died and will die in the future because of wars driven by superstition and myths which is just ridiculous
most scientists spend their whole day in labs or on their desks performing experiments and thinking
I don't see how they cause any trouble by doing so
they do not kill, steal or rape, much less doing so based on religious faith
BTW stop throwing your "morality" in the face of people, morality doesn't mean shit; only real "morals" we have are those that evolved in us as part of the social altruism we have developed; this doesn't mean they're a law or anything, we as a species should be able to adapt to the envrionment, which we're increasingly less able to do
just because your fairy tales book tell you you should do something doesn't mean you really have to, especially when your book is just what it is - a collection of absurdic fairy tales
you're not a kid anymore, it's time to stop believing in Santa Claus and the tooth fairy
religion has not made any contributions to humanity to start with, except for keeping it in dark about the real world around us for millenia, causing countless wars, burning people for being different, wiping out whole civilizations from the face of the earth, etc.
these are great contributions, no sane person can deny that
group homes, adoption shelters, bla-bla - are you kidding me?
first think about why we need these things, then talk nonsense
I showed you a study where they clearly inversely correlated the quality of living in a given country with the number of religious people in it
thnk before you type nonsense
[/QUOTE]
No, you killed yourself buddy. I told you to give a critical response and you didn't. Pal, the reason why you are constantly reduced to ash and ruin is because you type before you read. Remember, YOU said, "BTW it is not scientists who develop weapons, it is engineers who do it and there is a slight difference between a scientist and an engineer which I guess your brain isn't able to grasp". Did you read what the first link said?
Victor Ostrovsky, a former case officer of Israel's Mossad intelligence agency, recalled in his book The Other Side of Deception how he first learned of the Zionist state's secret weapons center:
It was Uri who enlightened me regarding the Nes Zionna [Tsiona] facility. It was, he said, an ABC warfare laboratory -- ABC standing for atomic, biological and chemical. It was where our top epidemiological scientists were developing various doomsday machines. Because we were so vulnerable and would not have a second chance should there be an all-out war in which this type of weapon would be needed, there was no room for error. The [captured] Palestinian infiltrators came in handy in this regard. As human guinea pigs, they could make sure the weapons the scientists were developing worked properly and could verify how fast they worked and make them even more efficient.
(emphasis mine)
you = :dead:
At the expense of others as human guinea pigs. Again, you = :dead: and not just :dead:, but a :dead: hypocrite.
More rubbish to steer blame away from scientists and into the hands of others. Buddy, you asked me to cite evidence about crimes done in the name of science. That first link proves it, the Tuskegee experiemnt which you obviously have no knowledge of proves it, and crimes done in the name of science is part of the reason why the second site was developed in the first place. These people obviously see something wrong with the lack of more responsibility within the science community (as it pertains to various weapons etc.)
SEE ABOVE.
You CAN'T see the point because you do not know how to critically read, analyze or respond. These concepts are foreign to you, so you'll simply reduce yourself to babbling on about how science has never been misused.
Victor Ostrovsky, a former case officer of Israel's Mossad intelligence agency, recalled in his book The Other Side of Deception how he first learned of the Zionist state's secret weapons center:
It was Uri who enlightened me regarding the Nes Zionna [Tsiona] facility. It was, he said, an ABC warfare laboratory -- ABC standing for atomic, biological and chemical. It was where our top epidemiological scientists were developing various doomsday machines. Because we were so vulnerable and would not have a second chance should there be an all-out war in which this type of weapon would be needed, there was no room for error. The [captured] Palestinian infiltrators came in handy in this regard. As human guinea pigs, they could make sure the weapons the scientists were developing worked properly and could verify how fast they worked and make them even more efficient.
(emphasis mine)
you = :dead:
At the expense of others as human guinea pigs. Again, you = :dead: and not just :dead:, but a :dead: hypocrite.
More rubbish to steer blame away from scientists and into the hands of others. Buddy, you asked me to cite evidence about crimes done in the name of science. That first link proves it, the Tuskegee experiemnt which you obviously have no knowledge of proves it, and crimes done in the name of science is part of the reason why the second site was developed in the first place. These people obviously see something wrong with the lack of more responsibility within the science community (as it pertains to various weapons etc.)
SEE ABOVE.
You CAN'T see the point because you do not know how to critically read, analyze or respond. These concepts are foreign to you, so you'll simply reduce yourself to babbling on about how science has never been misused.
