EVEN THE GERMANS DONT BELIEVE YOU FILTHY AMERICANS!
- Thread starter HERESY
- Start date
30% out of 1,000 participants isn't much to herald.
Out of 83 million people, it's almost something to scoff at.
Die Zeit - anyone every checked out their political coverage?
Hmm, all I will say is this: make sure the news sources you frequent aren't dressing up events and opinion polls with their ideological nonsense, CNN and Die Zeit have both been known to do that.
Out of 83 million people, it's almost something to scoff at.
Die Zeit - anyone every checked out their political coverage?
Hmm, all I will say is this: make sure the news sources you frequent aren't dressing up events and opinion polls with their ideological nonsense, CNN and Die Zeit have both been known to do that.
What is accurate if it is done right (that's logically perplexing)? Extrapolating statistics? Come on, 30% of 1,000 people is nothing in a population of 83 million people. That doesn't give an accurate consensus either way.
And my reasoning behind pointing out CNN's and Die Zeit's obvious ideological partisanship was for this THREAD only...it involved a CNN article. As far as FOXNews, MSNBC, NYTimes being all the same, unless you mean, all the same in the fact that they "influence mainstream opinion via their mass media presence", yes, that is true - them being the same, politically/ideologically, well, I believe "that" is demonstrable.
The NY Times has lost their credibility in journalistic circles (Jayson Blair sealed their fate, as well as Howell Raines, who was recently replaced - a tad late, you think?). As has the BBC. People want objective news, not blind partisanship - for either side.
And my reasoning behind pointing out CNN's and Die Zeit's obvious ideological partisanship was for this THREAD only...it involved a CNN article. As far as FOXNews, MSNBC, NYTimes being all the same, unless you mean, all the same in the fact that they "influence mainstream opinion via their mass media presence", yes, that is true - them being the same, politically/ideologically, well, I believe "that" is demonstrable.
The NY Times has lost their credibility in journalistic circles (Jayson Blair sealed their fate, as well as Howell Raines, who was recently replaced - a tad late, you think?). As has the BBC. People want objective news, not blind partisanship - for either side.
Sociologist do this type of stuff all the time.
nytimes lost their credibility? jajaja who's going to replace them? i bet it will continue to be the most read newspaper in the US.
as far as my views on the media. peep the following if you interested
http://sf.indymedia.org/uploads/myth_of_the_liberal_media.ram
mostly the works of Edward Herman and NOam CHomsky
nytimes lost their credibility? jajaja who's going to replace them? i bet it will continue to be the most read newspaper in the US.
as far as my views on the media. peep the following if you interested
http://sf.indymedia.org/uploads/myth_of_the_liberal_media.ram
mostly the works of Edward Herman and NOam CHomsky
nefar559,
No offense, but “sociologists do this type of stuff all the time” – got any examples of them making such a bold statement out of such a ridiculously small percentage of an aggregate population (remember, that is 300 people that said “yes” out of 83 million)? What a hackneyed answer.
Yes, if you haven’t noticed, the NY Times has lost their credibility, at least, according to any discerning individual. Oh, by the way, USA Today is the most widely read news(paper) publication in the US.
No offense, but I could probably eviscerate any argument you have to the otherwise.
No offense, but “sociologists do this type of stuff all the time” – got any examples of them making such a bold statement out of such a ridiculously small percentage of an aggregate population (remember, that is 300 people that said “yes” out of 83 million)? What a hackneyed answer.
Yes, if you haven’t noticed, the NY Times has lost their credibility, at least, according to any discerning individual. Oh, by the way, USA Today is the most widely read news(paper) publication in the US.
No offense, but I could probably eviscerate any argument you have to the otherwise.
no, but i read about it in class.
jajjajaja, i'm not going to sit here and disprove you, where you been in the days when we were counter-posting mcleanhatch? those days are over for me
hmmm, ask anyone what newpaper would they read for national, and international news ... it would be nytime....from what i heard USAToday lacks a lot of detail and depth .... i know what happen with the reporters ... but i dont think that would have much an effect.... plagiarism scandal didn't effect credibility in my opinion.
jajjajaja, i'm not going to sit here and disprove you, where you been in the days when we were counter-posting mcleanhatch? those days are over for me
hmmm, ask anyone what newpaper would they read for national, and international news ... it would be nytime....from what i heard USAToday lacks a lot of detail and depth .... i know what happen with the reporters ... but i dont think that would have much an effect.... plagiarism scandal didn't effect credibility in my opinion.
i cant stand the NY Times and niether do alote of people. if i wanted to hear liberal news i would visit the DNC website.
it seems that everything that comes out of the NYTimes come from the liberal/democrat talking points.
WOW!!! ^^^ you got to be kidding me right. even though they plagerized the crap out of many things. DAMN!!!
thats like saying that you would believe the boy who cries wolf no matter what.
it seems that everything that comes out of the NYTimes come from the liberal/democrat talking points.
WOW!!! ^^^ you got to be kidding me right. even though they plagerized the crap out of many things. DAMN!!!
thats like saying that you would believe the boy who cries wolf no matter what.
But here's somethin for all ya to prove that we germans are stupid as fuck...just push the start button on the site that will open...
German Superstar 2003
German Superstar 2003
^HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!
That's crazy shit man. They don't be bleepin out cusswords and talkin about weed on the t.v. over there?
You know it's when I watch stuff like that that I really get pissed that somebody shot Pac. You feel me on that?
I like Ludacris and all but damn, we need better role models.
T.V. and radio's a muthafucka.
Vote for Arnold.
That's crazy shit man. They don't be bleepin out cusswords and talkin about weed on the t.v. over there?
You know it's when I watch stuff like that that I really get pissed that somebody shot Pac. You feel me on that?
I like Ludacris and all but damn, we need better role models.
T.V. and radio's a muthafucka.
Vote for Arnold.
