entheogens role in the creation of religion and spiritual exploration

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Sep 25, 2005
1,148
1,075
0
44
#2
The 2 guys who made that video were influenced heavily by this guy John Allegro's work, particularly his book "the sacred mushroom and the cross" which is about the origins of christianity being based on a mushroom cult..

Allegro was one of the top scholars/translators of the dead sea scrolls.

Here's more on this guy.
**********************************************************
http://johnallegro.org/Allegro-SundayMirror.htm

Famous scholar challenges the faith of centuries

CHRIST AND THE SACRED MUSHROOM

By DAVID YORK

Lecturer John Allegro examines a dried specimen of the sacred mushroom.

‘Some will accuse me of blasphemy’



A DISTINGUISHED British scholar has written a sensational book that is certain to cause the greatest upheaval in orthodox Christian thinking since Charles Darwin said Man was descended from the ape.



For he not only argues the non-existence of Jesus Christ and the Apostles, but claims that Christianity itself – as well as Judaism and other religions of the near and Middle East—are no more than hangovers from an ancient fertility cult.



Expert

The author of this remarkable book is 47-year-old John M. Allegro, lecturer in Old Testament and Inter-Testamental Studies at Manchester University, and a philologist—a student of words and language.



He is also one of the world’s greatest experts on the Dead Sea Scrolls.

Mr. Allegro told the Sunday Mirror yesterday: “Thousands of years before Christianity, secret cults arose which worshipped the sacred mushroom—the Amanita Muscaria—which, for various reasons (including its shape and power as a drug) came to be regarded as a symbol of God on earth.

“When the secrets of the cult had to be written down, it was done in the form of codes hidden in folk tales.

“This is the basic origin of the stories in the New Testament. They are a literary device to spread the rites and rules of mushroom worship to the faithful.”



Challenge

Such a claim, such a challenge, to orthodox belief, coming as it does from one of the country’s leading experts in his field, is something of a religious H-bomb—threatening a shattering fall-out.

The controversy it will arouse must certainly lead to furious and acrimonious debates and schisms that will divide, not only Christians but Jews, Mohammedans and others whose religions have their origins in the areas covered by Mr. Allegro’s researches.

It is a fundamental challenge. To many it might suggest not only that there was no Christ or Moses,



Turn To Back Page



THE SACRED MUSHROOM

From Page One



Not only-to use Mr. Allegro’s own words – “that the stories in the Gospels and Acts were a deliberate hoax,” but also that there is no God.

Mr. Allegro bases his claims on his researches into the oldest written language known to us—Sumerian “Cuneiform” text dating back to 3500 BC. From this ancient tongue he believes came the language of the Bible.

And so, he says, we no longer have to take the New Testament story at its face value. We can trace the proper names and words used in it back to their true and original meanings.

“It is this,” says Mr. Allegro, “That reveal the cult of the phallic mushroom.”

Mr. Allegro’s book, which is to be published throughout the world, is bound to lead to fierce arguments. He says: “I’ll doubtless be accused by some of blasphemy. But these conclusions are the result of purely scientific dispassionate research.



Languages

“When I left the Royal Navy in 1947 I began to train for the Methodist Ministry as a theological student at Manchester University. This led me to a study of the ancient Semitic languages – including Old Testament Hebrew and Aramaic—and I became progressively more interested in the language and less in theology.

“Then came my appointment as the first British representative on the Dead Sea Scrolls editing team in Jerusalem.

From my work on these texts, the next step was a re-examination of New Testament names and titles, and to the realization that more lay behind them than was generally appreciated.

“And so I probed deeper—to the very beginnings of civilization. To Sumerian. And this book is the result.”

Mr. Allegro’s book, The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross, is to be published by Hodder and Stoughton in May.

Why are they handling it? Says their managing director, Mr. Robin Denniston: “John Allegro unquestionably raises fundamental and revolutionary religious questions.

“But even if he can be challenged on some of his interpretations, our feeling is that this is a serious and deeply important contribution to an area of knowledge which is of vital concern, not just to the Christian community, but to every literate person.”



ANOTHER GREAT SUNDAY MIRROR SERIES BEGINS TODAY



Sunday Mirror

April 5, 1970 Page 9

THE SACRED MUSHROOM AND THE CROSS

BEGINNING THE MOST CHALLENGING BOOK FOR YEARS

by JOHN ALLEGRO

FOR primitive man living in the sun-parched, often desert lands of the Near and Middle East, life was almost entirely dependent upon rain.

It came from the sky to make things grown, and in his simplicity he came to believe that somewhere up above him was a mighty phallus in the sky, and that rain was his semen that came down to fertilise the womb we call earth.

From this innocent reasoning all the religions of that area were born—the ancient cults of the Greeks and Persians, Judaism, Christianity, even Muhammadanism. All had their origins in this basic idea of a heavenly phallus.

Once man had worked out his theory about the divine rain, he thought he could help to stimulate rain in much the same way as he did orgasms on earth; by singing, dancing, orgiastic displays and, above all, by performing the sex act—particularly in the fields, where the sacred semen was most needed.

It was then a natural step to want to share the secrets of how to control the power and knowledge of the heavenly phallus.

But how?

Over the centuries there were those who experimented with herbs and drugs and, as I shall show, came upon one drug that really seemed to transport them out of this world into heaven.

But this knowledge was not to be shared indiscriminately. If god was jealous of his powers, so were those to whom he gave this glimpse of divinity. Paradise was for the favoured few.

And so there arose the priesthood with its secret preparations and ceremonies that had to be observed before the chosen ones could take the drug—rituals that gave them great

PLEASE TURN TO NEXT PAGE

CONTINUED FROM PAGE NINE

powers over the rest of the community.

Rarely, and then only for urgent practical purposes, were those secrets ever committed to writing.

Normally they would be passed between the priest and the initiate by word of mouth: dependent for their accurate transmission on the trained memories of men dedicated to the learning and recitation of these “scriptures.”

But if, for some dramatic reason – persecution, or the disruption caused by war—it became necessary to write down the precious names of the drug, the manner of its use, and the secret incantations, it was written in a secret form. A code—hidden in a story containing puns or some other word play.

I believe that this is the basic truth about the stories in the New Testament.

The key which unlocked the secret is philology – the study of words and language. Recent discoveries about the origins of the language of the Old and New Testaments—Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek—have revealed to me that from very early times the original meanings of the words and stories were lost or misunderstood.

Christ, for instance, far from being a real person, is now shown to be merely another name for the drug plant.

One of the occasions when the secrets of the drug cult had to be written down was after the Jewish revolt of 66AD.

Swayed by the narcotic-induced madness to believe God had called them to master the world in his name, the cult’s members provoked the mighty power of Rome to swift and terrible action.

Jerusalem was ravaged, her temple destroyed. Judaism was disrupted and her people driven to seek refuge with communities already established around the Mediterranean coastlands.

The mystery cults found themselves without their central fount of authority, with many of their priests killed in the abortive rebellion or driven into the desert.

The secrets, if they were not to be lost for ever, had to be committed to writing—and yet if found, the documents must give nothing away or betray those who still dared defy the Roman authorities and continue their religious practices.

The means of conveying the information were at hand, and had been for thousands of years. From the earliest times the folk-tales of the ancients had contained myths based upon the personification of plants and trees.

They were invested with human faculties and qualities and their names and physical characteristics were applied to the heroes and heroines of the stories.

Some of these were just tales spun for entertainment, others were political parables like Jotham’s fable about the trees in the Old Testament, while others were means of remember and transmitting therapeutic folklore.

The names of the plants were spun out to make the basis of the stories, whereby the creatures of fantasy were indemnified dressed, and made to enact their parts.

Here, then, was the literary device to spread occult knowledge to the faithful…

To tell the story of a rabbi called Jesus, and invest him with the power and names of the magic drug. To have him live before the terrible events that had disrupted their lives, to preach a love between men, extending even to the hated Romans.

Thus, should the talk fall into Roman hands, even their mortal enemies might be deceived and not probe further into the activities of the mystery cults within their territories.

The ruse failed. Christians, hated and despised, where hauled forth and slain in their thousands. The cult well nigh perished. What eventually took its place was a travesty of the real thing, a mockery of the drug’s power to raise men to heaven and give them the longed-for glimpse of God.

The story of the rabbi crucified at the instigation of the Jews was accepted as fact—as an historical peg upon which the new cult’s authority was founded.

What began as a hoax became a trap even to those who believed themselves to be the spiritual heirs of the mystery religion and took to themselves the name “Christian.”


The Crucifixion story was a ruse to guard the Sacred Mushroom. But the hoax became a trap we call Christianity.

Above all the cult forgot, or purged from their memories, the one supreme secret on which their whole religious and ecstatic experience depended.

This secret was the names and identity of the source of the drug, the key to heaven.

The source of the drug? It was the Sacred Mushroom.

The fungus recognized today as the Amanita Muscaria, or Fly-Agaric, had been known from the beginning of history. Beneath the skin of its characteristic red and white-spotted cap, there is concealed a powerful hallucinatory poison.

Its religious use among certain Siberian peoples and others has been the subject of a study in recent years, and its exhilarating and depressive effects have been clinically examined.

These include the stimulation of the perceptive faculties so that the subject sees objects much greater or much smaller than they really are. Colours and sounds are much enhanced, and there is a general sense of power, both physical and mental, quite outside the normal range of human experience.

Although it grows only in certain climatic conditions, the Amanita Muscaria could be dried and transported long distances by cult members.

The mushroom has always been a thing of mystery. The ancients were puzzled by its manner of growth without seed, the speed with which it made its appearance after rain, and its rapid disappearance.

Born from a volva or “egg.” It appears like a small penis, raising itself like the human organ sexually aroused, and when it spread wide its canopy the old botanists saw it as a phallus bearing the “burden” of a woman’s groin.

Every aspect of the mushroom’s existence was fraught with sexual allusions, and in its phallic form the ancients saw a replica of the fertility god himself.

Its drug was a purer form of the heavenly spermatozoa than that discoverable in any other form of living matter.

The drug was God himself, manifest on earth. To the mystic it was the divinely given means of entering heaven: God had come down in the flesh to show the way to himself, by himself.



So far I have not backed these statements of mine with proof. Let me begin by explaining how I set about my researches.

The main factor that has made these new discoveries possible has been the recovery of the oldest written language known to us—Sumerian “cuneiform” texts, dating back at their earliest to about 3,500 BC.

It now appears that this ancient tongue provides a bridge between the Indo-European languages, which include Greek, Latin and English, and the Semitic group which includes Hebrew and Aramaic.

For the first time, it becomes possible to decipher the names of gods, mythological characters – classical and biblical – and plant names. Thus their place and functions in the old fertility religions can be determined.

Stories and characters which seem quite different in the way they are presented in various locations and at widely separated points in history can now be shown to have the same central theme.

Gods previously considered as widely different as the ancient Greek Zeus and Jehovah can be seen to embody the same fundamental conception of the fertility deity, for their names have precisely the same origin.

Suddenly almost overnight, the ancient world has shrunk. All religious roads in the Near and Middle East lead back to the Mesopotamian basin – to ancient Sumer.

In biblical studies, as far as the origins of Christianity are concerned we must look not just to inter-testamental literature, the Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha and the newly discovered writings from the Dead Sea, nor even merely to the Old Testament and other Semitic works.

We have to bring into consideration Sumerian religious and mythological texts and the classical writings of Asia Minor, Greece and Rome.

Above all, it is the philologians—the students of language—who must be the spearhead of the new enquiry. It is primarily a study in words

The earliest writings was by means of pictures, diagrams crudely incised on

Adapted from The Sacred Mushroom and The Cross, by John M. Allegro, to be published in May by Hodder and Stoughton 63s © John M Allegro 1970.

Illustrations by ALLAN CRACKNELL

stone and clay. However lacking such symbols may be in grammar or syntax, they do convey in an instant the one feature which seemed to the ancient scribe the most significant aspect of the object or action he is trying to represent.

“Love” he shows as a flaming torch in a container, representing a womb; a “foreign country” as hills (because he lived in a plain).

As the art of writing developed further, we can begin to recognise the first statements of ideas which later had tremendous philosophical importance – “life,” “god,” “priest,” “temple,” “grace,” “sin,” and so on.

To seek their later meanings in religious literature like the Bible we must first discover their basic meaning.

For example, “sin” for Jew and Christian originally had to do with the wasteful emission of human sperm—a blasphemy against the god who was identified with the precious liquid.

To have discovered this is not just of limited academic interest—its original meaning lies at the root of modern Catholic strictures against the Pill.

So language is important. Because of it, identification of the main characters of many of the old classical and biblical mythologies is at long last possible.

To a reader brought up to believe in the essential historic truth of the Bible narratives some of the attitudes displayed in my approach to the texts may seem strange.

I appear to be more interested with the words than with the events they seem to record.

Similarly, a century or so ago, it must have seemed strange to the average Bible student to understand the approach of a “modernist” of the day who was more interested in the ideas underlying the Creation story of Genesis and their sources than in dating, locating and identifying the real Garden of Eden, and to solving the problem of whence came Cain’s wife.

Then, it took a revolution in man’s appreciation of his development from lower forms life, and a clearer understanding of the age of this planet, to force him to abandon the idea that Genesis was historically true – that the whole of the human race could trace its origin to two people living in the middle of Mesopotamia, and that the earth had come into existence in the year 4,004 BC.



The inquirer must begin with his only real source of knowledge – the written word. As for as Judaism and Christianity are concerned, this means the Bible.

There is precious little else than can give us details about what the Israelite believed about his god and the world about him, or about the real nature of Christianity.

The sparse references to one “Christus” or “Chrestus” in the works of contemporary non-Christian historians, tell us nothing about the nature of the man, and only dubiously—despite the claims often made for them—do they support his historic existence.

They simply bear witness to the fact (never in dispute) that the stories of the Gospels were in circulation soon after 70 AD—after the revolt of 66 AD.

If we want to know more about early Christianity we must look to our only real source, the written words of the New Testament.

The New Testament is full of problems. Among the most perplexing have always been the foreign, presumed Aramaic, “nicknames” given to characters like James and John—“Boanerges,” and Joseph, surnamed “Barnabus.”

The New Testament says these nicknames mean respectively “Sons of Thunder” and “Son of Encouragement” (or “Consolation”). Unfortunately, they don’t, and no amount of diddling with the text will make the “translations” fit the names.

Scholars usually assume that mistakes have crept into the writings through the unfamiliarity of later copyists with the language Jesus and his companions are presumed to have spoken—Aramaic. So they have tended to pass these “mistakes” by with a shrug.

But they are of crucial importance. They provide us with a clue to the nature of the original “Christianity.”

Concealed within the “nicknames” and their “translations” are names of the sacred mushroom, the sect’s “Christ.”

The deliberately deceptive nature of the mistranslations puts the lie to the whole of the “cover-story” of the man Jesus and his activities.

Once the ruse is penetrated, then research can go ahead fast with fitting the Christian phenomenon more firmly into the cultic patterns of the ancient Near East.

So our first task is to find out what these “nicknames” really meant, just as, in the Old Testament, we have to attach more importance to the names of its chief characters than the situation in which they are depicted.

Of course, history now and again forced itself on my attention during my researches. Did Abraham, Isaac and Jacob ever exist as real people?

Was there ever a sojourn in Egypt of the Chosen People, or a political leader called Moses? Was the Exodus historical fact?

These and many other questions are raised afresh by my studies, but it is my contention that they are not of prime importance. Far more urgent is the meaning underlying the myths in which these names are found.

In the case of Christianity, the historical questions are perhaps more acute. If the New Testament story is not what it seems, then when and how did the Christian Church come to take it at its face value, and make the worship of one man, Jesus—crucified and miraculously brought back to life—the central theme of its religious philosophy?

For Christianity under various names, had been thriving for centuries before the supposed birth of Jesus.

We are, then, dealing with ideas rather than people. We cannot name the chief characters of our story. Doubtless there were real leaders exercising considerable power over their fellows but in the mystery cults they were never named to the outsider.

We cannot, like the Christian pietist, conjure a picture of a young man working at his father’s carpentry bench, taking little children in his arms, or talking earnestly with a Mary while her sister did the housework.

In this respect, our study is not an easy one. There is no one simple answer to the problems of the New Testament discoverable by just reshuffling the Gospel narratives to produce yet another picture of the man Jesus.

The question we have now to ask is: does the Christianity revealed for the first time by my researches fit adequately into what went BEFORE the first century—not what came after in its name?

Sunday Mirror

April 12, 1970 Pg. 10



JOHN ALLEGRO’s controversial theory that strikes at the very foundations of Christianity..



THE SACRED MUSHROOM AND THE CROSS



ALL THE religions of the Near and Middle East—Judaism, Christianity and Muhammadism, as well as many of the old Greek and Persian mythologies—had the same common origin:


A simple, primitive belief that God was a phallus in the sky whose orgasmic rain fertilized the womb we call earth and so produced crops and vegetation.

Then priesthoods arose – men who said they were able to act as intermediaries with the divine phallus.

And it was believed that they were able to do this by the use of a powerful drug that did indeed seem to transport them from this world to some celestial paradise.

This drug was the mushroom, Amanita Muscaria, or Fly-Agaric.

At first the secrets of the mushroom cult – the procedures and incantations that had to accompany the gathering and use of the plant—were passed on only by word of mouth.

But when the time came for them to be written down, the instructions were given in the form of a code.

Old and secret names of the sacred fungus were woven into a story about a rabbi called Jesus. On the surface his sayings and actions seemed politically blameless, and religiously and morally praiseworthy.

Under the surface, however—concealed by word-play or punning, false “translations” and similar literary devices—were the real secrets of the cult.

In the sense that the story of Jesus and his friends was intended to deceive the enemies of the sect, Jews and Romans, it was a hoax, the greatest in history.

Unfortunately it misfired. The Jews and Romans were not taken in; but the immediate successors of the first “Christians” (users of the “Christus,” the sacred mushroom) were.

The Church made the basis of its theology a legend

Adapted from The Sacred Mushroom and The Cross, by John M. Allegro, to be published in May by Hodder and Stoughton, 63s. © John Allegro, 1970. Illustrations on this page are taken from The Children’s Bible in Colour, Paul Hamlyn, 30’s.

revolving around a man crucified and resurrected—who never, in fact, existed.

Why worship a mushroom in the first place?

For one thing the hallucinations caused were a known fact. And to the ancients its very appearance added to its magical quality. A plant that grew rapidly like the male sex organ when aroused, and when it spread wide its canopy it was seen as a phallus topped by the woman’s groin – a symbol of the supreme act of fertility.



TO the ancients the mushroom was a replica of the phallus in the sky.

To the Roman naturalist, Pliny, the fungus had to be reckoned as one of the “greatest of the marvels of nature,” since it “belonged to a class of things that spring up spontaneously and cannot be grown from seed.”

Until the invention of the microscope the function of the spore, produced by each fungus in its millions, could not be appreciated.

One explanation among the ancients for the creation of the mushroom without apparent seed was that the “womb” had been fertilized by thunder, since it was commonly observed that the fungi appeared after thunderstorms.

It was thus uniquely begotten. The normal process of procreation had been by-passed. The seed had not fallen from some previous plant, to be nurtured by the earth until it produced a root and stalk.

The god had “spoken” and his creative “word” had been carried to earth by the storm – wind – an angelic message of heaven.

To see the mushroom was to see the Father, and it was as “the Holy Plant” that the sacred fungus came to be known throughout the ancient world.



HOW can we come to these conclusions?

The answer is in the study of philology—the science of words and language—and the discovery of the true origins (and therefore meanings) of the names and stories told in the Bible.

The key is only about a hundred years old: the discovery by Sir Henry Rawlinson of clay writing tablets in the ruins of ancient Nineveh in Mesopotamia.

On them were written message in a hitherto unknown language called Sumerian. The “letters” consisted of wedge – shaped (“cuneiform”) signs impressed into soft clay which was then baked in the sun.

The wedge-shaped symbols developed from small pic-



Page 11



tures of common objects like a head, leg or other parts of the human body.

Each picture represented an idea, and such primitive “writing” can offer a better understanding of the thought behind the word than later, more stylized, methods of expressing letters and syllables.

The languages of the Bible, Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek, all derive ultimately from this ancient Sumerian, so we can now trace basic religious ideas farther back than ever before.

Furthermore, since proper names, like those of the gods and biblical and classical legends, tend to resist change, we can now begin to decipher their original meanings.

For example, Esau means “canopy” – the mushroom cap (hence the idea of his red skin, like the red and white-spotted cap of the Amanita muscaria).

“Moses” means “emergent snake” – a reference to the mushroom seen as a snake emerging from its hole in the ground (hence the conjuring trick with the serpent and the rod: Exodus 4.2-4). And so on.

More important, we can now decipher the names of the Jewish and classical gods, especially Jehovah and Zeus. Both mean the same: “Juice of fecundity,” the source of life.

So, despite everything we had previously thought, Jehovah was a fertility deity, and not, as commonly supposed, a desert god implacably opposed to the nature gods of Canaan and their sex rites.

Now we can begin to understand such biblical descriptive names of Jehovah as Sebaoth—“of Hosts,” as it is usually translated. Actually “Sebaoth” comes from two Sumerian words meaning “penis of the storm.” The name “Joseph” is a shortened form of the same title.

Similar phallic designations are given, as we now see, to many Sumerian, Greek and Semitic gods, tribal ancestors and heroes. Hercules, that great “club – bearer,” was named after the grossness of his sex organ, as was the Hebrew tribal ancestor Issachar.

This is just one example of how we can now span the whole area of our study and bring together apparently quite disparate religious cultssimply through being able to decipher the names and epithets of their gods.

The ancients believed that under the earth’s crust lay a “sea of knowledge” formed by the heavenly rain. Thus the souls of the dead must necessarily know more of the mind of God.

It followed that, since plants had their roots under the earth, certain of them, the drug-plants, could also tap the reservoir of divine knowledge.

So, if man could but discover by experiment those more powerful plants, he, too, could be permitted to share the secrets of the dead—and of God. He could know the future, and also be endowed with a god-like, superhuman strength of mind and body.

Among devotees of the mushroom cult, it was the Amanita Muscaria which contained this divine juice more than any other drug-plant.

It is not surprising, therefore, that the cult should have become, in the Near East, a mystery religion which persisted for thousands of years.

There seems good evidence for believing that it swept from there into India in the worship of the Soma drug, subject of many hymns of the Sanskrit Rib Veda, some 3,500 years ago.

The cult certainly flourished in Siberia in more recent times, and a possibly related version in South American has been the subject of much recent inquiry.

Partly because of the religious use of the sacred mushroom, and the fearful respect with which country folk have always treated it, its more original names became taboo and folk-names and epithets proliferated at their expense.

It is as if, in our own language, the only name by which we knew the mushroom was the folk – name “toadstool,” and that some researcher of the future was faced with the problem of deciding what species of plant life served as the habitual perch of large frogs.

In seeking for the mushroom folk-names and epithets, one of our main sources obviously will be its distinctive shape of a slender stem supporting an arched canopy, like a sun-shade. This characteristic Was made much of in mythology. Extended to gigantic proportions, this figure is reflected in such imagery as huge men like Atlas holding up the canopy of heaven, or of mountains like Olympus serving the dual function of supporting the sky and providing a connecting link between the gods and earth.

Above all, the mushroom provoked sexual imagery and terminology. The manner of its rapid growth from the volva, or “womb,” the rapid erection of its stem, and its glans-like head, all stimulated phallic names.

Of such, as we may now recognize, is the most common Semitic name for the mushroom—phutr (Arabic), pitra (Aramaic)—portrayed in the New Testament myth as “Peter,” an invented disciple of the non-existent Jesus.

The deciphering of plant and drug names not only allows us to share the imagery their shapes provoked in the minds of the ancient botanists, but to learn of the power they were supposed to wield. This is particularly important with regard to the mandrake – an old name for the Holy Plant.

It was with the mandrake that Leah bargained with Rachel for a night of connubial bliss with Jacob (Genesis 30.14-16). It appears frequently in folk-lore as the prime magic plant and aphrodisiac.

I can show that the Greek name, Mandragoras, comes from a Sumerian phrase meaning “Fateplant-of-the-field,” and is philologically related to the classical “Nectar,” the food of the gods.’ Both in fact, represented the sacred mushroom.



AT LAST we can understand some of the legends about this magic plant.

We can see why it was thought to resemble parts of the human body; why it shrieked when pulled from the ground.

The Christians believed that they were the true spiritual heirs to ancient Israel.

So it was an obvious device to convey to the scattered cells of the cult reminders of their most sacred doctrines and incantatory names and expression concealed within a story of a “second Moses,” another Law-giver, named after the patriarch’s successor in office Joshua (Greek Iesus, “Jesus”).

Thus was born the Gospel myth of the New Testament.

How far it succeeded in deceiving the authorities, Jewish and Roman, is doubtful.

I can now show that one or two of the sparse references to Jesus that the ecclesiastical censors have allowed to come on in Jewish written traditions demonstrate without doubt that, at least at the beginning, Jews knew full well what the “Jesus” was that the Christians worshipped. The references also show clearly that the Jews despised the whole business as much as did the Romans.

The Romans could not find words low enough to describe the Christians they hounded out from their secret meetings and tortured to death. And the Romans were famed for their religious tolerance!

Those most deceived appear to have been the sect who took over the name “Christian” (“semen-smeared”), and formed the basis of the modern church.

But by then the prime ingredient of their sacred meal had been lost—or suppressed – and its priests offered the initiates in its place a wafer and sweet wine, assuring them that before the Host touched their lips it would have changed into the flesh and blood of God.

Foremost among the literary devices used to encode secret names for the sacred mushroom was word-playing or punning. There are many examples of this in the Old Testament, and it was commonly used by Jewish teachers to discover supposed hidden meanings in Bible texts.

Here are examples of mushroom-name puns in a New Testament writer’s passage on the wisdom and foolishness of Christian teaching.

He ingeniously inserts the following phrase:

“For the Jews demand signs and the Greeks seek wisdom, but we preach Christ crucified, a stumbling – block to Jews and folly to Gentiles . . .” (I Corinthians 1.23).

The word “stumbling-block” (Greek skandalon, our “scandal”) is properly used of a “trap” or “snare.” It denotes a knobbed stick or bolt upon which the bait is placed, and which, if tripped by the prey, sets off the trap itself.

So metaphorically it is used for any impediment which hinders or traps an unwitting person.

The Greek word skandalon, we can now appreciate, originally meant “bolt.” Its Aramaic equivalent was tiqla, and the phallic mushroom was sometimes called a “bolt – plant” because the shape of the primitive key or bolt was, in essence, a short rod surmounted by a knob.

So we may decipher the first part: To the Jews (i.e., in the Jewish language), the “Christ crucified” (the semen-anointed, erect phallic mushroom) is a “bolt-plant” (tiqla – mushroom, “stumbling – block”). The second part neatly Confirms the first: “and folly to the Gentiles” (that is, Greeks). The Greek work for “folly” is moria, and Morios was a Greek word for the mushroom! Now the pun is made clear.

The “stumbling-block” (tiqla, “boltmushroom”) pun appears quite frequently. We know it best in the text in Matthew 16 about Peter and the “keys” of heaven. In it, Peter—the mushroom—is given the “key,” or “bolt” of paradise (v. 19), and is called a “stumbling-block” (v. 23).

The other part of that text about Peter being the “rock” foundation of the Church-on which the Roman Catholics place so much emphasis—is a double wordplay.

Not only is there the long-recognised pun on Peter-Petros in Greek and petra (rock) and pitra (mushroom)—but there is also a pun on the Latin cepa, one of a number of “onion” words which were used of the similarly formed bulbed mushroom. (The French still call certain mushrooms “cepe” or “ceps”—after the Latin.)

Even calling the name “satan” (“Get thee behind me…v. 23) is in line with the depa pun, since Setanion is another Latin name which also means onion or mushroom.

One of our common vegetables is chicory, a variant form of whose name in Greek is Korkoron. This last occurs also as a mushroom name, and Pliny’s description of “chicor” shows that whatever plant he is describing it is not the culinary root we know so well:

“Those who have anointed themselves with the juice of the whole plant, mixed with oil, become more popular and obtain their wishes more easily…so great are its health-giving properties that some call it Chreston…”



SOME ancient confusion through similarity in words has taken place here.

The juice was to be “rubbed on” or “anointed” (christos), and its properties were so beneficial that it was called Chreston (Greek khrestos, “good honest, health-bestowing,” etc.).

One is reminded of the form of the name by which non-Christians spoke of the object of the sect’s adoration – Chrestus.

Suetonius speaks of the emperor Claudius having to expel Jews from Rome because they were making a disturbance “at the instigation of Chrestus.”

What Pliny is describing then is the “Jesus Christ” mushroom whose consumption brought upon the first-century Christians the vilification and contempt of the Roman historians.
++++
WORSHIP BY ORGY TURNED THESE WOMEN INTO WITCHES

A startling theory that Christianity is a hoax based on a sex-drug cult

By JOHN ALLEGRO

AS WE now know from our studies of ancient Sumerian writings dating back to 3,500 BC, God was originally thought of as a giant phallus in the sky.

His fertile seed—rain—fell to the womb called earth, causing it to “give birth” to crops and vegetation.

And we also know that this let to a special priesthood – men who could act as intermediaries with the heavenly phallus.

They achieved this by the use of the “Holy Plant”—a plant whose juices were a powerful hallucinatory drug that could indeed seem to transport its users to another world.

This plant was the mushroom known as Amanita muscaria.

And from my researches as a philologist—a student of languages and words—I know now that when the time came for the secrets of the mushroom cult to be written down to preserve them intact in a hostile world, it was done in a kind of code.

Within the story of a rabbi called Jesus were woven names and incantations used in the gathering and consuming of the sacred fungus.



The Church made the basis of its theology a legend revolving round a man Jesus, crucified and resurrected, who never, in fact, existed.

In the sense that the story of Jesus and his friends was intended to deceive enemies of the sect, Jews and Romans, it was a Hoax—the greatest in history.

Unfortunately it misfired. The Jews and Romans were not taken in; but the immediate successors of these first “Christians” (users of the “Christus,” the sacred mushroom) were.

It was a concentration of the powerful juice of the “Holy Plant” that the Magi—the magicians or Wise men (the great pedlars of the ancient world) – believed would give anyone anointed with it amazing power. They could “obtain every wish, banish fevers and cure all diseases without exception.”

So the Christian, the “smeared or anointed one,” received “knowledge of all things” by his “anointing from the Holy One” (I John 2.20).

Thereafter he had need of no other teacher and remained for ever-

Adapted from The Sacred Mushroom and The Cross, by John M. Allegro, to be published in May by Hodder and Stoughton, 63s. © John Allegro, 1970.

More endowed with all knowledge.

Whatever the full ingredients of the Christian unction may have been, they would certainly have included the aromatic gums and spices of the traditional Israelite anointing oil: myrrh, aromatic cane, cinnamon and cassia.

That these ingredients formed only part of the sacred formula is well known. Josephus, the Jewish historian of Roman times, says there were thirteen elements, and the Talmud names eleven, plus salt, and a secret herb which was added to make the smoke rise in a vertical column before spreading outwards at the top.

With the characteristic shape of a mushroom in mind we can now hazard a fair guess at the secret ingredient.

Knowledge and healing were two aspects of the same life-force. To be rubbed with the Holy Plant was to receive divine knowledge. It also cured every sickness.

Josephus suggests that anyone of the Christian community who was sick should call the elders to anoint him with oil in the name of Jesus (the Epistle of James 5.14)—in other words with the juice of the sacred mushroom.



Use of the name “Jesus” as an invocation for healing was appropriate enough.

Its Hebrew origin which we know as “Joshua” comes from a Sumerian phrase meaning “semen which saves” or “restores.”

The fertility god of the Greeks, Dionysus (otherwise known as Bacchus, the good of the wild women known as Bacchantes), whose symbol was the erect penis, has virtually the same name as Joshua (or Jesus), as we can now recognise from their mutual Sumerian source.

Their orgiastic rites were derived from the same maddening drug of the Amanita Muscaria.

The Twelve Apostles are sent out among their fellow-men casting out demons and anointing the sick with oil (Mark 6.13). Healing by unction persisted in the Church until the 12th century, and the anointing of the dying—“extreme unction”—has persisted in the Roman Catholic Church.

The principle behind this practice remains the same: God’s “seed-of-life” imparts life to the ailing or the dead.

Things, as well as people, could be anointed so that they became “holy”—that is separated to the god’s service. The Semitic word for “holy” is fundamentally a fertility word.

The anointing into holiness of kings and priests is again largely imitative in character. The prime duty of the king was to ensure the fertility of the land and well-being of his subjects. Many of the Greek and Semitic words for “lord” and “lordship” convey this idea when seen in their Sumerian form.

The priest’s function was also to see that the god played his part in inseminating the land.



The most common Hebrew word for “priest” –kohen—familiar as well-known Jewish surname, comes from a Sumerian title meaning literally, “guardian of semen.”

Pouring the sacred juices over the heads of these dignitaries was intended to represent them as “gods”—replicas of the divine phallus.

So we anoint our Sovereign at the coronation ceremony.

In our churches the ritual processio0n through the nave to the alter, headed by the fertility symbol of the cross and the anointed Bishop, preserves the ancient idea of the fertility god entering his house.

In the phallic mushroom—the “man-child” born of the “virgin” womb – we have the reality behind the Christ figure of the New Testament story.

By imitating the mushroom by eating it and sucking its juice (or “blood”), the Christian was taking unto himself the panoply of his god, as were the priests in the sanctuary.

As the priests “served” the god in the temple—the symbolic womb of divine creation—so the Christians and their cultic associates worshipped their god and mystically involved themselves in the creative process.

In the language of the mystery cults they sought to be “born again,” when –purged afresh of past sin—they could apprehend the god in drug-induced ecstasy.



Women had their roles in the ancient cult. There were the sacred prostitutes—an office well known in the ancient world.

It is usually assumed that the woman dedicated herself to the service of the god as a sexual partner in some imitative ritual designed to stimulate the generative faculties of the fertility deity.

Doubtless, in many of the cults she did perform such a function, copulating before the alter with the priests or other male worshippers at certain festivals.

There are also indications that it was considered necessary to make some sort of booth or covering for the prostitute and the magic plant during the seduction.

Hosea specifies that the sacred prostitutes practised their art under the trees, where “the shade is good” (4.13).

Ezekiel speaks of some kind of full-length veil by which they “ensnared souls” (13.18).

The Holy Plant had not be uprooted under cover of darkness, “lest the act be seen by the woodpecker of Mars” (perhaps a folk-name for the red-topped Amanita Muscaria), or “the sun and moon.”

The sexual power of women was vital to the mystery cults and accounts in large measure for the attractiveness of cuts to women from the earliest times.

It also has much to do with the antagonism towards sexuality generally and the distrust of women displayed by the laser Church, and the readiness with which supposed witches were hounded by Christians until quite recent times.

The telepathic control over people’s minds exercised by such females, known the world over as “the evil eye,” came originally from this ability to arouse men’s passions.

The Latin fascinus, from which our “fascination” comes, as well as meaning “bewitching,” was also the proper name of a deity with a phallic emblem, and this as we can now appreciate, is the original source of this word and the Greek baskanos, “sorcerer.”

It was believed that the malign influences of “fascination,” which came to be extended to any form of mental dominance, could be averted by wearing on the person a model phallic symbol—rather as the Christian symbol of the Cross is currently displayed by those within and without the Church toward off evil.

A similar connection between sexual influence and sorcery appears in the derivation of our word “magic.” Its immediate source is the Latin magus, representing the Old Persian magush, the title of a religious official whose power of mind and body earned him a reputation for sorcery—and shoes name meant originally “big penis.”

Ezekiel, in describing the necromantic (divination from the dead) ritual of the witches, says they fastened on their wrists “magic bands,” as our English versions translate the Hebrew (13.18).

As we can now appreciate, the Sumerian original means “magical imprisonment,” and is portrayed in scenes of mystery rites of the Dionysiac cult as a basket from which a serpent’s head is emerging.

The symbolism here represents the matted vulva bursting open to reveal the emergent mushroom, anciently identified with the snake.

Here is the origin of the magic practice of serpent-charming, as well as of such mythologies as Moses (“emergent snake.” as his name means) in his basket in the bull-rushes (exodus 2-3).



The snake is an important feature of Dionysiac (Bacchic) imagery and cultic rites.

The Maenads are pictured with serpents entwined in their hair and round their limbs.

In the case of Ezekiel’s witches, their soul-catching “baskets” were brought along partly to offer some imitative encouragement to the dormant fungus to open and reveal itself.

It is not difficult to understand the reasoning behind the ancient identification of the mushroom and the serpent. Both emerged from holes in the ground, could erect themselves, and both bore

Please turn to next page

CONTINUED FROM PAGE 35

in their heads a fiery poison which the ancients believed could pass from one to the other.

The prime example of the relation between the serpent and the mushroom is, of course, in the Garden of Eden story of the Old Testament.

The cunning reptile prevails upon Eve and her husband to eat of the tree whose fruit “made them as gods, knowing good and evil” (Gen 3.4).

The whole Eden story is mushroom-based mythology-not least in the identity of the “tree” as the sacred fungus.

Even as late as the 13th century some recollection of the old tradition was known among Christians, to judge from a fresco painted on the wall of a ruined church in Plaincourault in France.

There the Amanita Muscaria is gloriously portrayed entwined with a serpent, while Eve stands by, her hands on her belly.

As we saw, women had an important part to play in the mushroom cult.

Another of their activities lay in that curious phenomenon – religious lamentation. This sympathetic identification of the worshipper with a suffering god seems to be a necessary part of most religions.

To see Catholic women, particularly in Mediterranean countries, racked with real grief at Eastertide as they contemplate the Crucifix and the wounds of their Lord, can leave little doubt that they are suffering real mental anguish.

There is apparently in human beings, and in women particularly, a capacity for sympathetic grief – which demands dramatic expression – however historically improbable the tragic events and persons they re-enact in their imaginations.



Ritual lamentation has a sexual significance as can now be demonstrated by its terminology.

Whatever inward emotional satisfaction the practice of lamenting the dead god may have achieved, its basic intention was to bring him back to life.

In the case of agricultural communities, the dead god is a personifica-tion of the fertility of the soil deemed to have perished during the hot summer months, but capable of being revivified under the influence of the autumn and spring rains—the fertilization of the father-god in heaven.

Thus the lamentation ceremonies were intended to rejuvenate the dormant phallus of the fertility deity.



The common word in the Hebrew Old Testament for “lamentation” we now recognise as having come from a Sumerian term meaning “erect”.

It is related to other words in Hebrew and Greek for a musical instrument, kinnor and kinura (“penis erector”) respectively. This is the harlot’s “harp” of Isaiah 23.16, the “lyre” of David, whose playing relived the maniacal fits of Saul (I Samuel 16.16, etc.).

The priestesses whose task it was to make ritual lamentation for the dead god—or the dormant mushroom—by screeching and wailing had their classical counterpart in the female votaries of the god Bacchus/Dionysus – the so-called Bacchantes, “raisers of the phallic mushroom,” as we now understand the term.

They were noted for their drug-induced frenzy, at one moment whirling in a mad dance, tossing their heads, and driving one another on with screaming and wild clamour of musical instruments. At another, they were sunk in the deepest lethargy.

The Bacchantes both possessed the god and were possessed by him; theirs was a religious “enthusiasm” in the proper sense of that term—that is, “god-filled.”



NEXT SUNDAY: What John Allegro says the Lord’s Prayer really means.



Sunday Mirror

April 26, 1970 Pg. 28



ABRACADABRA –the magic phrase hidden in the Lord’s Prayer

THE SACRED MUSHROOM AND THE CROSS

JOHN ALLEGRO’s startling theory that challenges all Christian belief.



THERE always have been extreme difficulties in understanding the story of Jesus.

There are in the New Testament problems posed on historical, geographical, topographical, social and religious grounds which have never been resolved.

But to the Christian scholar they have always seemed of less relevance than the apparently incontrovertible fact of the existence of one, semi-divine man who set the whole Christian movement in motion, and without whose existence the inauguration of the Church would seem inexplicable.

But if it now transpires that Christianity was only a latter-day manifestation of a religious movement that had existed for thousands of years—what then?

Let it be emphasized: if only one of the mushroom references of the cryptic phrases of the New Testament text were correct, then a new element has to be reckoned with in the nature and origin of Christianity.



If the stories of Jesus are no more historically real than those of Adam and Eve, Jacob and Esau and even of Moses, what of the Bible’s moral teachings?

How far can our new appreciation of the origins and nature of Judaism and Christianity allow us to accord its teaching universal authority?

This, perhaps, is the most crucial issue raised by the present discoveries.

And in my mind there is no doubt that thanks to these discoveries about the origin of the languages of the Bible—Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek, and their related tongues – the stories of the New Testament have indeed been exposed as myths.

Just as years ago Bible commentators realized that when the writer of the New Testament Book of Revelation wrote “Babylon” in his political diatribe he meant the enemy Rome, so we know now that when the Gospel writers speak of Jesus, Peter, James and John, and so on, they are really personifying the sacred mushroom – the Amanita Muscaria. They are spinning stories from its cult-names.

But what of the crucifixion of Jesus?

Well, for a start, one of the names for the mushroom which has come down in Aramaic, with a somewhat different reference, was “The Little Cross.” To understand the significance of this folk-name, we have to appreciate the nature of the ancient instrument of death.

The Roman crux, or “cross” itself, was a straight or forked piece of wood which the criminal carried across his shoulders like a yoke to the place of execution.

There his wrists were tied to the extremities of the “yoke” and this stretcher was then hoisted to the top of a pole set in the ground (the Greek stauros).This gave the well known form of the cross of Christian symbolism.

Sometimes, some of the weight was taken off the wrists or hands by providing the upright with a projection peg to support the wretched man’s crutch. It was called a “saddle” (Latin sedile).

In all this, the ancient worshipper of the sacred mushroom saw a striking, if gruesome, similarity with the adored object of his religion.

The cross piece was the mushroom cap and the upright support was the stem of the fungus.

Every aspect of the phallic mushroom was replete with sexual allusions, and the sign of the cross was primarily a sexual fertility symbol.

It is with this significance that the cross became the sign of the phallic god Hermes, erected throughout the ancient world at cross-roads, and thought to bring good luck to travelers, as the Crucifix is commonly displayed by the roadside in Catholic countries today.

In the case of the Hermes symbol, not only have we the upright and two “arms but half-way up the vertical post was fixed a replica phallus, to remind the passer-by of the god’s fertility powers.

This phallus—“saddle”—is possibly preserved symbolically today in the double cross-piece of the characteristic crucifix of the eastern churches.

The Semitic verb for “crucify” as used in the Old Testament means stretch out, disjoint. So the “crucifixion” of the “Christ” fungus in these terms meant the stretching out of the mushroom at its fullest extent.

Thereafter the fungus speedily wilts and rots away. The ancient saw in its fast “growth,” and speedy death, a microcosm of nature.

For they believed the fungus no less miraculously came to life again, and after a day or two its red tip could be seen pushing its way through the pine needles of its natural habitat.

The god had been resurrected.



THE Easter story of the New Testament simply puts into human story terms the “crucifixion” of the sacred mushroom.

This is followed by its return to the mother earth that gave it birth and its resurrection to life after thirty-six hours.

And what of the words supposedly spoken by Jesus at the time of this crucifixion?

“At the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, ‘Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani?’” which means “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” (Mark 15.34).

Unfortunately, it doesn’t. “Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani” is an ingenious approximation to ancient incantation to the mushroom.

The whole name will have meant “the cone of the erect mushroom.” That is the cap, or “glans” of the fungus.

It has, of course, nothing at all to do with a Semitic phrase about “forsaking” anyone.

The invocation was meant to be made when the devotee was on the point of pulling up the sacred mushroom—that is, after it had been “crucified” or stretched out to its full.

It reminds us of another invocation to God. When Jesus speaks of the deity he is often made to say “My father who art in heaven,” and the Lord’s Prayer starts off similarly: “Our father who art in heaven…”

“My/our father who art in heaven” conceals at a Semitic level of understanding another secret name of the sacred fungus.

The original, which meant “sky-stretched canopy of the cone,” was cleverly teased into an Aramaic phrase “abba debaregi’u,” “O my (our) father who art in heaven!”

Having now penetrated the disguise and laid bare the original Sumerian from which the name must have been derived, we can recognise it in a somewhat jumbled form in a phrase we have all known from our childhood story-books—“abracadabra.”

Originally it had a far more serious intent, and is first found in the writings of a second-century physician of a heretical “Christian” sect, the Gnostics.

This author left precise instructions for the use of “abracadabra,” which by that time had come to be used simply as a magical phrase to ward off evil.

Having broken the code of the “Lord’s Prayer” to this extent, we can go on and solve a number of perplexing problems in the text which have engaged scholars’ attention for centuries.

The Ten Commandments form part of a mushroom myth in the Old Testament story of Moses and Mount Sinai.

Even the two slabs of stone on which the “Ten Words” were inscribed by the finger of God originated from the “bun” shape of the primitive writing tablet, resembling the top of a mushroom. Indeed, it is from one of the names of the fungus that, through Greek and Latin, we derive our word “tablet.”


The Old Testament Story of Moses and the Ten Commandments

was a myth disguising mushroom worship, Allegro Claims.

Illustration from the Mansell Collection.





THE name of the sacred mountain, Sinai, comes, as we can now see, from a Sumerian word meaning “brazier.”

This accounts for its description as “wrapped in smoke…like the smoke of a kiln” (Exodus 19.18)

The fiery-topped Amanita Muscaria seemed to the ancients like a brazier.

When Moses, the serpent-mushroom character, meets Jehovah there and receives the “tablets of testimony,” he finds after the interview that his face is glowing so much that people are afraid to approach him (Exodus 34.30).

The substance of the Ten Commandments, hover well rooted some of them may have been in ancient tribal laws, owe their form and position in the story to word-play on ancient mushroom names.

The ancient Israelite religion of Jehovah worship was based largely on the mushroom cult. Many other of the old myths about the patriarchs—stories like Jacob and Esau, representing the stem and red cap of the sacred fungus respectively—now reveal for the first time their mushroom connections.

The earlier legends are not cryptic writings, like those of Jesus and his friends. They are merely mushroom folk-lore, illustrating in entertaining story form, aspects of the mysterious fungus.

Later the cult came under pressure from a new “orthodoxy” in Judaism which tried to root out all traces of the fertility religion that gave it birth.

The sacred mushroom cult then went underground, to reappear with even more disastrous results in the first and second centuries AD, when the drug-crazed “Zealots” (another pun on a mushroom name) and their successors again challenged the might of Rome.

A “reformed” Christianity then drove its drug-takers into the desert as “heretics,” and eventually so conformed to the will of the State that in the fourth century it became an integral part of the ruling establishment.

By then its priests had forgotten the codes and the true meaning of Christ’s name—and were taking the words of the hoax literally—trying to convince their followers that the Host had miraculously become the flesh and juice of the god.

But, as I said at the beginning, what matters is the moral teaching of the Bible.

Can it be argued that the Ten Commandments and the Sermon on the Mount embody a store of moral idealism that will serve mankind for a long time –irrespective of their origins?

If some aspect of the Christian ethic still seem worth while today, does it add or detract from their validity that they were promulgated two thousand years ago by worshippers of the Amanita Muscaria?







This article has been re-published online – NOT FOR PROFIT – and for academic purposes only.

This article remains available free online at:

http://www.johnallegro.org
 
Sep 25, 2005
1,148
1,075
0
44
#3
Benny Shanon (Hebrew: בני שאנון‎; born 1948) is a professor of Psychology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and holds the Mandel Chair in Cognitive Psychology and Education.

Born in Tel Aviv, Shanon studied philosophy and linguistics at Tel Aviv University and received his doctorate in experimental psychology from Stanford University. He is author of the 2002 book Antipodes of the Mind: Charting the Phenomenology of the Ayahuasca Experience published by Oxford University Press.

Benny Shanon is known for his controversial theory that the patriarch Moses was under the influence of hallucinogens when he received the law. Specifically, he believes that a psychedelic cocktail similar to ayahuasca may explain Moses's vision of the burning bush: "In advanced forms of ayahuasca inebriation, the seeing of light is accompanied by profound religious and spiritual feelings."[1]

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This is the html version of the file http://www.psychointegrator.com/down/biblical_entheogens.pdf.
Google automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web.
Page 1
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
Time and Mind:
The Journal of
Archaeology
Consciousness
and Culture
Volume I—Issue I
March 2008
pp. 51–74
Reprints available directly
from the publishers
Photocopying permitted by
licence only
© Berg 2008
Biblical Entheogens:
a Speculative
Hypothesis
1
Benny Shanon
Benny Shanon is Professor of psychology at the Hebrew
University of Jerusalem (Israel). His main foci of research
are the phenomenology of human consciousness and the
philosophy of psychology. His publications include The
Representational and the Presentational (1993) and The
Antipodes of the Mind (2002). At present, he is working on
a book devoted to a general psychological theory of human
consciousness. [email protected]
Abstract
A speculative hypothesis is presented according to which
the ancient Israelite religion was associated with the use
of entheogens (mind-altering plants used in sacramental
contexts).The hypothesis is based on a new look at texts
of the Old Testament pertaining to the life of Moses.The
ideas entertained here were primarily based on the fact
that in the arid areas of the Sinai peninsula and Southern
Israel there grow two plants containing the same
psychoactive molecules found in the plants from which
the powerful Amazonian hallucinogenic brew Ayahuasca
is prepared.The two plants are species of Acacia tree and
the bush Peganum harmala.The hypothesis is corroborated
by comparative experiential-phenomenological
observations, linguistic considerations, exegesis of old
Jewish texts and other ancient Mideastern traditions,
anthropological lore, and ethnobotanical data.
Keywords: entheogens, psychedelic, psychotropic,
shamanism, Old Testament, Acacia, Peganum harmala,
Ayahuasca
Page 2
52 Biblical Entheogens: A Speculative Hypothesis
Benny Shanon
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
In his book Poisons sacrés, ivresses divines
(which, to my knowledge, has not been
translated into English), Philippe de Félice
(1970 [1936]) reviews various cultures
throughout the world and notes the use of
psychotropic substances in them.The use
of such substances, most of which fall in
our contemporary Western culture under
the label “drug,” has in many traditions
been considered sacred. Indeed, de Félice
points out that in many religions, both in
the old world and in the new, the use of
such substances was (and often still is)
central.The substances, or the plants from
which they were produced, were deemed
holy and at times even divine. De Félice
puts forward the hypothesis that the
use of psychotropic substances is deeply
embedded in human culture and intrinsically
intertwined with what he characterizes as
the most basic human instinct—the search
for transcendence.Thus, he proposes, the use
of psychotropic substances is at the root of
perhaps all religions.
Subsequently, similar ideas have been
expounded in various different quarters.
Indeed, an increasing number of people refer
to the psychoactive agents more generally
known as psychedelic (mind-expanding) or
hallucinogenic by the term entheogen—that
is, agents that bring one in touch with the
Divine within.This term was coined by Ruck
et al. (1979) and further discussed by Ott
(1996) and by Jesse (2001). For discussions
of the relationship between entheogens
and the origin of religion, as well as that of
the use of entheogens in religious practices,
the reader is referred to La Barre (1972),
Wasson et al. (1986), Ott (1995), Smith
(1964, 2000), the anthologies edited by
Forte (1997), Roberts (2001), and Labate
and Goulart (2005) as well as Devereux
(1997) and Rudgley (1993), the reviews by
Shanon (2001b, 2002c) and the non-scientific
proposals of McKenna (1992). A modern
experimental study of the religious import
of psychoactive substances is that of Pahnke
(1972); illuminating intellectual discussions
of the spiritual and religious significance of
entheogens are offered in Smith (1964, 1976,
2000).
The recourse of powerful psychoactive
plants and preparations in order to establish
contact with the higher realms of spirituality
has been at the very heart of shamanic
practices all over the globe. Special mention
will be made below of the major instrument
of Amazonian shamanism, the hallucinogenic
brew Ayahuasca. Psychoactive plants and
substances were also prominent in the urban
cultures of pre-Colombian America—the
Aztec, the Mayan and the Incaic. For
further information the reader is referred
to Dobkin de Rios (1984), Harner (1972,
1973), Langdon (1979), Langdon and Baer
(1992), Reichel-Dolmatoff (1975, 1978),
Walsh (1990), and Winkelman (1995, 2000).
Further information on hallucinogens and
their role in traditional cultures is found in
Dobkin de Rios (1984), Furst (1976, 1990),
Harner (1973), Ott (1993), and Schultes
and Hoffman (1992). For works especially
concerned with pre-Colombian America
see Emboden (1981, 1982), Emboden and
Dobkin de Rios (1981), Ott and Wasson
(1983), Ripinsky-Naxon (1998), Schultes
(1972), Schultes and Winkelman (1995), and
Wasson (1961, 1980).
But psychoactive plants and substances
also played a key role in the religions of the
old world. Wasson (1968) proposed that
Soma, the magical nectar of the Hindu Vedas,
Page 3
Benny Shanon
Biblical Entheogens: a Speculative Hypothesis 53
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
was actually an infusion of a hallucinogenic
mushroom, Amanita muscaria.The sacred
drink employed in ancient Zoroastrian
religion, the Homa or Haoma, was also
suggested to be a psychoactive agent, its
constituent plant being the shrub Peganum
harmala (harmal in Arabic). Indeed, Flattery
and Schwartz (1989) argue that the
Indian Soma was made of this shrub, not
of a mushroom as suggested by
Wasson.
The literary evidence concerning
the prominence of altered states of
consciousness in the religious rites of ancient
Figure 1 Peganum Harmala
(photo:Avinoam Danin)
Page 4
54 Biblical Entheogens: A Speculative Hypothesis
Benny Shanon
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
India and Persia is quite abundant.The Rig
Veda, the oldest classical Vedic scripture,
is a compendium of hymns to Soma. In
these, worshipers often praise the brew as
a divinity and mark the special effects that
it has induced in them. Zoroastrian hymns
to Homa are similar.The following are my
own free translations of textual examples
presented in de Félice (1970 [1936]):
Oh, King Soma, prolong our lives
Like the sun who nourishes the days every
morning.
*
The Soma is full of intelligence
It inspires man with enthusiasm
It makes the poets sing.
*
We have drunk the Soma: we have come
to be immortal, we have arrived at
the Light, we have reached the Gods.
*
Half of me is in the skies, and the other
extends to the low depths
Have I drunk Soma?
I am tall to the utmost, my elevation
reaches the clouds
Have I drunk Soma?
(Rig Veda)
Oh Haoma of gold, I am asking you for
wisdom, force, victory, health,
healing, prosperity and grandeur.
(Zen Avesta)
As for ancient Europe,Wasson and his
collaborators (Wasson, Hoffman, and Ruck,
1978; Wasson et al. 1986) proposed that at
the center of the famous Greek mysteries of
Eleusis was the consumption of yet another
psychoactive brew, one containing ergot
alkaloids. (See also Ruck 2006, where the
entheogenic role of mushrooms is discussed.)
Suggestions have been made that the
three great monotheistic religions of the
West—Judaism, Christianity, and Islam—also
have their roots in the consumption of
psychoactive substances. In his famous and
controversialThe Sacred Mushroom and the
Cross,Allegro (1970) associated the origin
of Christianity to a psychoactive mushroom;
this work is primarily based on philological
analysis. Other entheogenic theories
concerning early Christianity were later put
forth by Ruck, Staples, and Heinrich (2001)
and Ruck (2006) as well as by Bennett and
McQueen (2001) and, most recently, Gosso
and Camilla (2007). In particular, basing their
argumentation on the analysis of works
of art and textual exegesis, Ruck and his
associates proposed that early Christianity
involved the use of psychoactive mushrooms.
Further religious artwork from medieval
Spain and Italy portrays associations between
datura and sacred knowledge, hence a
possible indication of an entheogenic use of
this potent psychoactive plant (Celdrán and
Ruck 2001).
Similar suggestions were also made
in conjunction with Islam. Studying Arab
and Bedouin folklore in southern Jordan,
the independent investigator Rami Sadji
hypothesized that Islam and pre-Islamic
Arab religion are grounded in the use
of entheogens (Sajdi at www.acacialand.
com). And just as this manuscript went
to press, a most interesting scholarly work
discussing entheogens in Islam appeared (see
Dannaway, Piper, and Webster 2006).
Page 5
Benny Shanon
Biblical Entheogens: a Speculative Hypothesis 55
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
This paper is concerned with Judaism.
Merkur (1985, 2001), a psychoanalyst
and student of religion, proposed that the
Manna the people of Israel received from
heaven during their wandering through
the Sinai desert was actually an entheogen.
Here I would like to put forth a hypothesis,
admittedly speculative, regarding other
enteogenic uses in early Hebrew religion.
Before turning to the subject matter
itself, I would like to clarify the nature of
my involvement in the issues at hand. I am
a cognitive psychologist and a philosopher
of psychology whose main professional
concern is the phenomenology of human
consciousness. For about twenty-five
years I have been studying normal waking
consciousness, and I have attempted to
formulate a structured theory thereof
(see Shanon 1989, 1998c, in press). Fifteen
years ago, the contingencies of life led me
to encounter the Amazonian powerful
psychoactive brew Ayahuasca, and to
have my first personal experiences with it.
Subsequently, when reading about the topic,
I was struck by the similarity between the
visions I have had with the brew and those
reported in the records of the experiences
of indigenous Amerindians.This made me
entertain the idea that Ayahuasca visions are
not, as anthropologists have claimed (see
Reichel-Dolmatoff 1975), the manifestation
of the fantasies of the minds of primitive
people, but rather a symptom of the working
of the human mind, the mind of Homo
sapiens in general. I shall note that at the
time of my first encounter with Ayahuasca
practically all scientific studies of this brew
belonged either to the natural sciences
(botany, pharmacology, physiology, and
medicine) or to cultural anthropology. My
assessment, however, is that in its essence,
the phenomenon at hand pertains to the
realm of internal experience, and thus to
the discipline concerned with mind and
consciousness. In line with the pioneering
insights of William James (1929) and
Aldous Huxley (1971), I regard the study
of psychoactive plants and their effects as a
most precious avenue for the study of the
human cognitive system in general and of the
phenomenon of consciousness in particular.
Thus, I have launched the first cognitive-
psychological study of Ayahuasca ever
conducted.
Empirically, my work is based on the
interviewing of a large number of persons
coming from different locales and contexts
of use as well as on my own extensive
experience with this brew. (I have partaken
of it about 160 times in various locales
and contexts.
2
) Theoretically, this research
project presents a systematic, comprehensive
charting of the various facets of the
Ayahuasca experience and offers a novel
theoretical framework to conceptualize them
from a cognitive psychological perspective.
The results of these investigations are
reported in my comprehensive monograph
The Antipodes of the Mind (Shanon 2002a)
as well as in Shanon (1998a, 1998b,
2002b, 2003a, 2003c). One main finding
of my research is that, indeed,Ayahuasca
visions exhibit significant inter-personal
commonalities that defy socio-cultural
variations.
Lastly by way of introduction, I am a
Jew who, though not observant, finds the
Jewish textual heritage to be personally
very meaningful. Following my experiences
with Ayahuasca, I came to regard various
aspects of the Jewish heritage from a new
Page 6
56 Biblical Entheogens: A Speculative Hypothesis
Benny Shanon
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
perspective. Propelled by ideas on the role of
entheogens in human history such as those
reviewed above, I am here proposing still
another entheogenic, admittedly speculative,
hypothesis.The hypothesis originated in the
finding of parallels between psychological
effects induced by Ayahuasca and patterns
described in the Bible in conjunction with
special experiences and events in the life
of the founder of the Israelite religion and
its greatest prophet, Moses.The hypothesis
is further corroborated by botanical and
ethno-botanical information that I have
collected, by linguistic considerations, by the
exegesis of Talmudic and mystical Jewish texts,
by anthropological information pertaining
to Jewish and Mideastern traditional lore,
as well as by psychedelic data pertaining to
a concoction analogous to Ayahuasca.The
textual and empirical information discussed
below was gathered from various domains
and pertains to a variety of academic and
cultural disciplines. Some of the findings
noted here are new, and the bringing of
the different elements together is originally
mine. All told, I would say that this research
has been conducted in a way similar to
that of an independent detective-like
investigation.
Ayahuasca
Before I turn to Moses and the Bible, let me
present some further information about
Ayahuasca and about the Mideastern bush,
harmal.
Ayahuasca is one of the most important,
and most powerful, of the psychoactive
agents employed in Amerindian cultures
(see Schultes 1982). Etymologically,“aya-
huasca” in Quechua (the language of the
Inca empire) is a compound word meaning
“the vine of the spirits” or “the vine of
death.”The brew is made out of two plants.
Usually, the first is Banisteriopsis caapi
(Malpighiaceae), a liana, whereas the second
is Psychotria viridis (Rubiacaea), a bush which
in the vernacular is referred to as chacruna.
In common parlance, the term Ayahuasca
is used to refer not only to the brew but
also to the first of the two constituent
plants.The indigenous peoples of the upper
Amazon region have used Ayahuasca for
millennia, and in the vast region including
western Brazil and the eastern areas of
Ecuador, Peru and Colombia,Ayahuasca has
been the main pillar of the native culture. In
the past,Ayahuasca was used for all major
decisions of a tribe, particularly declaring
war and locating game for hunting. It was
also at the center of initiation rites.Today,
Ayahuasca remains a common instrument of
shamans and medicine-men (see for instance
Reichel-Dolmatoff 1971, 1975, 1978; as well
as Dobkin de Rios 1972, 1992; Langdon,
1979, and Luna 1986).The brew also serves
as a pivotal sacrament in several new
syncretic religions that bring together the old
Amerindian traditions of the Amazon and
popular Christianity (see Labate and Sena
Araújo 2002; Polari 1999).
Typically,Ayahuasca induces powerful
visions as well as hallucinations in all
other perceptual modalities. Pronounced
nonperceptual cognitive effects are also
manifest.These include personal insights,
intellectual ideations, affective reactions and
profound spiritual and mystical experiences.
Moreover,Ayahuasca may introduce those
who partake of it to what are experienced
as other realities.Those who consume the
brew may feel that they are gaining access
to new sources of knowledge and that the
Page 7
Benny Shanon
Biblical Entheogens: a Speculative Hypothesis 57
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
mysteries and ultimate truths of the universe
are being revealed to them. All this is often
coupled with what Ayahuasca drinkers
describe as an encounter with the Divine.
Chemically, the main active constituents
of the brew are the alkaloids N,N-
Dimethyltryptamine or DMT, harmine, and
harmaline.The first is a potent hallucinogen,
but it is inactive when taken orally.The
deactivation of DMT is itself blocked by
the other constituents, all beta-carbolines
which are monoamine oxidase (MAO)
inhibitors.The beta-carbolines protect the
DMT from deamination by the MAO and
thus render it orally active. (For a classical
review, see Schultes 1972; for more recent
comprehensive discussions, see Ott 1993,
1994, as well as Strassman 2001.)
The consumption of each constituent
of the Ayahuasca potion alone does not
result in hallucinatory effects.
3
For this, the
two indicated plants (or their functional
equivalents) are needed. Specifically, DMT,
the substance inducing the hallucinations, is
found in the chacruna, whereas the other
compounds are found in the Ayahuasca
vine. It is often said that the first constituent
gives light, whereas the second gives forceful
energy, but for the hallucinogenic effects
the combination of the two is necessary.
At times, alternative constituent plants
are used, but the basic principle is always
maintained: one plant contains DMT
whereas the second contains the MAO
inhibitors.
As noted above in Brazil there are several
syncretic religions combining Christian and/or
African traditions with Ayahuasca rituals.
In one such religion, the Church of Santo
Daime, hymns are sung during the Ayahuasca
(in that context the brew is called Daime—in
vernacular Brazilian Portuguese,“give me”)
session. Personally, I was very much struck
by the great similarity between many of
these hymns and those of the Vedic and
Zoroastrian traditions.The following are my
own free translations of some representative
fragments of Daime hymns; the interested
reader is referred to MacRae (1992) and
Polari (1999):
Daime force, Daime light
Daime love !
4
*
Daime ... the professor of all professors
*
I have taken this drink
It has incredible power
It demonstrates to all of us
Here in this truth
I have climbed, I have climbed, I have
climbed
I have climbed with joy
When reaching the Heights
I encountered the Virgin Mary
I have climbed, I have climbed, I have
climbed
I have climbed with love
I have encountered the Eternal Father
And the Redeemer, Jesus Christ
The hymns from which these fragments are
taken are said to have been received by the
founder of the Daime Church, Mestre Irineu
Sera, a rubber-plantation worker who lived in
the Bolivian and Brazilian Amazon during the
early part of the twentieth century. Surely,
he did not know of either the Vedas or of
the Zoroastrian religion. I have cited from
these hymns, even though they pertain to
Page 8
58 Biblical Entheogens: A Speculative Hypothesis
Benny Shanon
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
a tradition totally different from that which
is the topic of this paper, to give further
support to the hypothesis, made by Flattery
and Schwartz (1989) and cited above,
according to which the Hindu Soma and
the Iranian Haoma are to be identified with
Peganum harmala, the Near Eastern harmal.
Harmal
The MAO inhibitors harmine and harmaline
contained in Banisteriopsis caapi are also
found in the above mentioned shrub of the
Near East, Peganum harmala. Indeed, the
scientific name of the plant as well as the
names of the active substances in question
derive from the name harmal. In Arabic, this
means “taboo” as well as “sacred.” Of the
same root is the Hebrew word herem, which
means “taboo.”
Having had quite extensive experience
with Ayahuasca, I was curious about harmal.
Following the instructions of Dr. Mina Paran,
a pharmacologist who is an expert on
the medicinal plants of the Land of Israel, I
found a large field of the plant. It was just
in front of the Qumran caves, the home of
the Essenes, the ancient Judaic (and perhaps
proto-Christian) mystic group who lived in
the Judaean desert from the second century
BCE
to the second century
CE
. Qumran is
also the place where the oldest biblical
manuscripts (along with other religious texts),
the so-called Dead Sea scrolls, have been
found. I was startled. Intuitively, it seemed to
me evident: The Essenes must have made
use of this psychoactive plant. I did not have
any empirical proof for this but found the
coincidence most powerful.
In the Bible there is not a single mention
of harmal. Or rather, we do not know of any.
Of course, the old Hebraic text is replete
with names of plants whose botanical
identification we do not know or of which
we cannot be certain.
However, harmal is associated with a long
medicinal tradition in the Near East. Feliks
(1997) reports that a twelfth-century Jewish
encyclopedia-like text describes harmal as
a medicinal plant. Inquiries I have made in
Israel with Jews from Iran and Morocco
confirmed that harmal was traditionally
associated with various magical and curative
powers. In Iran, harmal (known as asphan)
incense was used to exorcize evil spirits,
whereas Moroccan Jews used harmal in
various medical treatments as well as for the
induction of abortion. Further still Yemeni
Jews used the plant to heighten one’s spirit
and in treatments against depression, and
in (Arabian) Egypt it was known to have
hallucinogenic properties (for reviews of
which, see Emboden 1972; Danin 1983;
and Palevitch and Yaniv 1991). Surfing on
the Internet I encountered the above-
mentioned site of the Jordanian researcher
of traditional Bedouin medicine, Rami Sajdi.
Sajdi discovered that Bedouin healers have
used harmal for both medicine and sorcery.
Sajdi also reports on many mythological and
folkloristic tales associated with the plant.
Moses and the Psychedelic
Experience
Let us now go back to the Old Testament,
to Moses. As written in conjunction with
his passing away, at the very end of the
Pentateuch:“There arose not a prophet since
in Israel like unto Moses, whom the Lord
knew face to face” (Deuteronomy 34:10; see
also Exodus 33:11; all citations in this paper
are taken from the King James translation).
Indeed, in the Jewish tradition it is said that
Page 9
Benny Shanon
Biblical Entheogens: a Speculative Hypothesis 59
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
whereas all prophets saw the divine through
a speculum that does not shine, only Moses
saw God through a speculum that shines
and spoke to him directly, face to face
(Babylonian Talmud,Tractate Yevamot, 49b);
for further discussion, see Scholem (1993)
and Wolfson (1994).
Following are five episodes in Moses’ life
that struck me as exhibiting patterns that
are typical of psychedelic experiences. More
specifically, all patterns are very similar to
ones that, in my own personal experience
corroborated by interviews with a great
number of other users of the brew, are
encountered while under the effects of
Ayahuasca.
The first episode is Moses’ very first
encounter with God. It took place in the
Sinai desert, where Moses resided with his
father-in-law, Jethro, who was the priest of
the desert people of Midian. Consider the
following:
Moses kept the flock of Jethro ... and he
led the flock to the backside of the desert,
and came to the mountain of God, even
to Horeb. And the angel of the Lord
appeared unto him in a flame of fire out
of the midst of a bush: and he looked, and,
behold, the bush burned with fire, and the
bush was not consumed. And Moses said,
I will now turn aside, and see this great
sight, why the bush is not burnt. And
when the Lord saw that he turned aside
to see, God called unto him out of the
midst of the bush, and said, Moses, Moses.
And he said, Here am I. (Exodus 3:1–4)
Encountering the Divine is one of the most
powerful experiences associated with high-
level Ayahuasca inebriation, (For an extended
description of the experiences within the
indigenous Amazonian context, the reader
is referred to Payaguaje 1983; for other
examples and further discussion, see Shanon
2002a, 2001b, 2002c.) Experiences of this
kind, however, are private and delicate to
the utmost and I prefer not to comment on
them further. Rather, I would like to focus
on the other element in the description, the
bush which was not consumed.
I propose that this event involved no
change in the real world, having nothing to
do with either the bush or the fire. Rather,
it reflected a radical alteration in the state
of consciousness of the beholder—that
is, Moses. Moses’ sense of time changed,
and an actual moment in physical time was
subjectively perceived as an eternity. Such
altered perception of time is common with
high levels of Ayahuasca inebriation (Shanon
2001a).Thus, gazing at the bush, Moses felt
that much time had passed. In particular,
he felt that enough time had passed for
the bush in front of him to be burnt and
consumed. But in the external physical
domain, only a fraction of a second had
elapsed, hence no actual change in the bush
was perceived.
Also of interest is a comment made by
Feliks (1994) in a lexicon of plants of the
Holy Land. He notes that various (uncited)
investigators have proposed that the bush
was either a plant that produces light
scintillations or that it was a hallucinogen.
In the latter case, he suggests the gum that
grows on acacia trees. We shall return to
acacia below.
A second biblical episode is that of
the encounter of Moses and his brother
Aaron with Pharaoh’s sorcerers. In it both
parties transformed rods into serpents (or
great reptiles). As attested by both the
Page 10
60 Biblical Entheogens: A Speculative Hypothesis
Benny Shanon
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
anthropological literature (for a review, see
Luna and Amaringo 1991) and my own
empirical research (Shanon 1998a, 2002a),
in Ayahuasca visions serpents are most
common. Moreover, visions in which rods
and pillars of wood are transformed into
serpents are reported as well.
Third, let me turn to the most sacred and
tremendous event in the Hebrew Bible—
theophany at Mt. Sinai. It is on this occasion
that the Ten Commandments were given and
it was then that the covenant between God
and Israel was established. With this, Israel
was made into a people. All the Children
of Israel were present.They had to prepare
themselves in three days of purification and
sanctification, during which no sexual activity
was allowed. It is said that God came upon
the mountain and that under penalty of
death no one except for Moses was allowed
to step forward:
And it came to pass on the third day in
the morning that there were thunders
and lightnings, and a thick cloud upon
the mount and the voice of the trumpet
exceeding loud; so that all the people
that was in the camp trembled ... And all
the people saw the thunderings, and the
lightnings, and the noise of the trumpet,
and the mountain smoking. (Exodus 19:16;
20:18)
[After the laws were given, the people of
Israel offered sacrifices and]: They saw the
God of Israel and there was under his feet
as it were a paved work of sapphire stone,
and as it were the body of heaven in his
clearness ... And the sight of the glory
of the Lord was like devouring fire on
the top of the mount in the eyes of the
children of Israel. (Exodus 24:10, 17)
There are several features in the foregoing
description that resemble prominent
characteristics of the Ayahuasca experience.
Before I turn to these, however, let me
underline the three-day purification, including
the abstention from sexual activity. In all
traditional contexts of Ayahuasca use, such
restrictions are standard.
5
Turning to the experience of theophany
itself, I shall highlight three features which
are also common with Ayahuasca.The first is
fire. In all contexts of its use, the Ayahuasca
experience is characterized as an encounter
with light. People who have partaken of the
brew often speak of supreme light, many
times in the form of fire. In advanced levels
of Ayahuasca inebriation, the seeing of light
is accompanied by profound religious and
spiritual feelings. On such occasions, one
often feels that in seeing the light one is
encountering the ground of all Being—that
which is the source of everything that exists
and the power that sustains the cosmos,
life, and the mind. Many identify this power
as God. In Shanon (2002a), I devote special
discussion to the experiences of supreme
light. By way of example here is a report
furnished by one of my informants:
In front of me was a most brilliant source
of light, like a lantern of many, many facets.
I knew that were I to look at it straight
ahead I would collapse and perhaps
die.Thus, I turned my head. During this
experience, I felt as if I was losing my
sense of self and the faculty of memory.
The second feature to be noted is the
fear of death. Such fear is very common
with Ayahuasca. Indeed, drinkers of the
brew often feel that they are about to die.
Significantly, as noted above, etymologically
Page 11
Benny Shanon
Biblical Entheogens: a Speculative Hypothesis 61
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
the term “ayahuasca” is associated with
death.
Third is synaesthesia, that is, the blending
of percepts pertaining to different sensory
modalities. In the biblical text cited above,
we read that the Children of Israel saw the
thunder and the noise of the trumpet. Both
a review of the anthropological literature
and my own empirical studies reveal that the
seeing of auditory material is very common
with Ayahuasca. Other synaesthetic effects
are also encountered, but they are less
common (for further discussion, see Shanon
2003d).
Going on with Moses’ life, I now note the
fourth episode:
And Moses said unto the Lord. See, thou
sayest unto me, Bring up this people; and
thou hast not let me know whom thou
wilt send with me. Yet thou hast said, I
know thee by name, and thou hast also
found grace in My sight. Now therefore,
I pray thee, if I have found grace in thy
sight, shew me now thy way, that I may
know thee, that I may find grace in thy
sight ... And he said, My presence shall go
with thee, and I will give thee rest. And
he said unto him, If thy presence go not
with me, carry us not up hence ... And
the Lord said unto Moses, I will do this
thing also that thou hast spoken: for thou
hast found grace in my sight, and I know
thee by name ... And he said, I will make
all my goodness pass before thee, and I
will proclaim the name of the Lord before
thee; and will be gracious to whom I
will be gracious, and will shew mercy on
whom I will shew mercy. And he said,
Thou canst not see my face; for there shall
no man see me, and live. And the Lord
said, Behold, there is a place by me, and
thou shalt stand upon a rock. And it shall
come to pass, while my glory passeth by,
that I will put thee in a cleft of the rock,
and I will cover thee with my hand while
I pass by. And I will take away mine hand
and thou shalt see my back parts; but my
face shall not be seen. (Exodus 33: 12–23)
This episode is most amazing. Indeed, it
has perplexed traditional Jewish scholars
throughout the ages. How can God have a
face and a back? How can any part of Him
be seen? Maimonides, the great Medieval
scholar and rationalist philosopher, explained
that in this context the epithets ‘Face’ and
‘Behind’ refer respectively to higher and
lower levels of man’s understanding of
the Divine or to central or peripheral
aspects of His essence (see Maimonides
1963). But again, the Ayahuasca experience
suggests another explanation. Seeing
creatures without being able to see their
faces is a common aspect of the Ayahuasca
experience.This is explicitly noted in the
folklore of various Amerindian groups and
corroborated in my own investigation. In
one of the interviews I conducted with
non-indigenous experienced drinkers of
Ayahuasca in Rio de Janeiro, in response
to my (standard) query as to the most
impressive Ayahuasca vision that the
informant had had, I received the following
description:
I saw a creature. It was a woman, but not
a normal person, not a regular human
being. I saw this woman clearly, but I could
not see her face. I so much wanted to
see her face, and I implored her Please,
please show your face to me. She walked
forward, away from me, with her back to
Page 12
62 Biblical Entheogens: A Speculative Hypothesis
Benny Shanon
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
me. I continued to implore her.Very swiftly
she turned her head backwards, towards
me. It was so swift that I could hardly see
anything.The only thing I detected was a
smile. She had smiled at me in a fashion
which was both benevolent and slightly
mocking, as if to indicate how small I was
as a human being. And then she went on
walking with only her back towards me.
What I find most striking in the biblical
description is not only God’s hiding of his
face, but Moses’ entreating. What happens
during an Ayahuasca session, and in particular
what one sees in the visions that the brew
induces, is not merely a function of the
brew itself.The person partaking of the
brew has a most important contribution as
well. With the same quantity of the same
brew, different persons may experience
visions of different degrees, as may a single
person in different contexts. It is as if what
happens during an Ayahuasca session is
an interaction, a pas de deux, between the
brew and the person who has partaken of
it. As every long-term user of Ayahuasca
discovers, with experience one learns to
handle the brew and the mental energies it
generates. And with experience one can go
farther and advance in one’s journeys in the
regions of non-standard consciousness. As
explained in detail in Shanon (2002a, 2002b),
with experience one’s interaction with
one’s visions becomes more active. At the
beginning, one only sees ‘things’, later (or with
higher levels of inebriation), one may step
into scenes. With more experience, one can
interact with the entities, creatures or objects
that one sees in one’s visions. In the most
advanced (hence, rare) cases, one might
even direct (as does the director of a film)
what is going to happen during the vision.
Moreover, whereas the novice is utterly
passive, advanced drinkers of Ayahuasca will
often exercise more effort and attempt to
penetrate the ‘Ayahuasca world’ more deeply.
Some people may be more insistent than
others. Facing a gate, some will venture to
enter, others will be afraid to do so; seeing a
door, some will attempt to open it, whereas
others will pass by; if the door does not
open, some will insist, implore, perhaps pray,
hoping that it eventually opens, revealing
more and more secrets. Indeed, many see
the Ayahuasca experience as precisely
that—an occasion to discover secrets—of
this or other realities. My own investigations
indicate that it is precisely the person with
this attitude (as compared, for instance,
to those who partake of the drink just in
order to be cured and to gain well-being)
who has the most powerful visions. Having
such an attitude is symptomatic of certain
personality traits; these include inquisitiveness,
venturesomeness, courage, daring,
determination, insistence, perseverance, as
well as a propensity to be attracted to the
magical and secretive. Reading the Scriptures
reveals that Moses exhibited all these
personality traits. In fact, we see this in his
very first encounter with the Divine, the first
episode examined here, that of the bush in
the desert.
Not indicated in the biblical texts
associated with Moses is the seeing of
disembodied eyes.This, however, is a feature
noted in the most explicit visual description
of Divine revelation—that in the first
chapter of the book of Ezekiel, known as
the Vision of the Chariot. In an independent
analysis (Shanon 2003b) I have compared
this famous biblical account with powerful
Page 13
Benny Shanon
Biblical Entheogens: a Speculative Hypothesis 63
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
Ayahuasca visions and marked significant
similarities between the two. I shall note that
the latter are also reminiscent of descriptions
of celestial realms in the Jewish mystical
tradition known as the literature of the
Merkava (chariot) or Heikhalot (palaces),
which spans from the second to the fifth
century
CE
.
The fifth and last item pertaining to
Moses that I would like to mention as
symptomatic of a psychedelic experience is
that noted by all who saw Moses when he
came back the second time from the Mount,
bringing the tables of the Law—the skin of
[Moses’] face shone (Exodus 34:30). I have
found this to be a very common, practically
universal, experience: after Ayahuasca
sessions, people seem to be shining—they
look younger, the skin of their face is smooth,
their eyes are full of light, and they appear to
be especially beautiful.
Let us take count. Inspecting various episodes
in the life of Moses, one encounters striking
similarities with features characteristic of the
altered states of consciousness induced by
the Amazonian brew Ayahuasca. Indeed, the
biblical episodes describe experiences that
are among the most common with this brew.
These include serpentine metamorphosis,
synesthesia, intense light, seeing creatures
without faces and the encounter with the
Divine. Whereas the detection of light
and the encounter with the Divine are not
specific to Ayahuasca, the other features
noted are especially symptomatic of this
particular entheogen. Having established
the basis for the characterization of Moses’
special religious experiences as DMT-induced
altered states of consciousness, let me turn
to the psychotropic substance at hand and
examine whether it could have been within
Moses’ (and that of his fellow Israelites)
reach.The following discussion will attempt
to show that the answer to this question is a
definite yes.
Shittim—a Possible Biblical
Entheogen
In the book of Exodus, immediately following
the account of the Mt. Sinai theophany, we
read:
And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying,
Speak unto the children of Israel, that they
bring me an offering: of every man that
giveth it willingly with his heart ye shall
take my offering. And this is the offering
which ye shall take of them: gold, and
silver, and brass. And blue, and purple, and
scarlet and fine linen and goats’ hair. And
rams’ skins dyed red, and badgers’ skins
and shittim wood. Oil for the light, spices
for anointing oil, and for sweet incense.
Onyx stones, and stones to be set in the
ephod [the high priest’s vestment, B.S.],
and in the breastplate. And let them
make me a sanctuary; that I may dwell
among them. According to all that I shew
thee, after the pattern of the tabernacle,
and the pattern of all the instruments
thereof, even so shall ye make it. And
they shall make an ark of shittim wood ...
and thou shalt overlay it with pure gold,
within and without shalt thou overlay it,
and shalt make upon it a crown of gold
round about ... And thou shalt make
staves of shittim wood, and overlay them
with gold. And thou shalt put the staves
into the rings by the sides of the ark, that
the ark may be borne with them ...Thou
shalt also make a table of shittim wood ...
Page 14
64 Biblical Entheogens: A Speculative Hypothesis
Benny Shanon
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
and thou shalt overlay it with pure gold,
and make thereto a crown of gold round
about ... and thou shalt set upon the table
shewbread before me always ... And thou
shalt make boards for the tabernacle
of shittim wood standing up ... and thou
shalt make ... sockets of silver under the
... boards ... And thou shalt make bars
of shittim wood ... and thou shalt overlay
the boards with gold. (Exodus 25: 1–14,
15–29, abridged)
And thou shalt make a vail of blue, and
purple, and scarlet, and fine twined linen
of cunning work ... And thou shalt make
an hanging for the door of the tent, of
blue, and purple, and scarlet, and fine
twined linen, wrought with needlework.
And thou shalt make for the hanging five
pillars of shittim wood, and overlay them
with gold, and their hooks shall be of gold;
and thou shall cast five sockets of brass for
them. (Exodus 26: 31, 36–7)
And thou shalt make an altar of shittim
wood ... and thou shalt overlay it with
brass ... And thou shalt make staves for
the altar, staves of shittim wood, and
overlay them with brass. (Exodus 27: 1, 2, 6)
The materials listed throughout this passage
are precious.This is obvious for gold, silver,
and precious stones.The dyes of blue, purple,
and scarlet were extremely costly in the
ancient Near East and they were highly
valued.The only item that stands out is
‘shittim’, a type of wood. As indicated by
the long citation, this item plays a central
role in the construction of the tabernacle
—the frame of the tent, the ark, the table,
the supportive boards are all made of this
tree.
Let me, before going on, make a linguistic
clarification. In the original Hebrew text, the
expression is “atzei shittim.” Atzei is a plural
form of etz, tree or wood, and shittim is the
plural of shita, acacia.The proper translation
of atzei shittim should have been “acacia
trees”. Indeed, the modern Jerusalem Bible
translates the expression at hand either to
“acacia” or to “acacia wood.”
Why shittim? Traditional Jewish scholars
have explained that the poor, those who
do not have at their possession gold and
silver, should provide wood. I would like
to propose another explanation—the
tree having psychoactive properties.
There are many varieties of the tree,
and it grows not only in the Sinai desert,
but also in Australia, Mexico, and South
America. Subspecies growing in the Sinai
peninsula and in the Negev desert of
southern Israel and containing DMT
are Acacia albida (Mimosaceae), Acacia
lactea (Mimosaceae) and Acacia tortilis
(Mimosaceae). Also containing DMT are
Acacia seyal (Mimosaceae) and Acacia nilotica
(Mimosaceae), which grow in Egypt (see
Shulgin and Shulgin, 1997). Feliks (1997)
proposes that the biblical shittim is Acacia
albida; Duke (1983) associates the shittim
with Acacia seyal. However, Danin (personal
communication), the present-day leading
expert on the plants of the Land of Israel,
has pointed out to me that neither of these
plants grows in the Sinai peninsula. (See
also Alon, 1993; as well as on the Flora of
Israel Online website, <flora.huji.ac.il> and
website of the Hebrew University botanical
gardens <www.botanic.co.il/A/catalog.asp>.)
Thus, the most likely candidates seems to be
Acacia tortilis and Acacia lactea. In sum, while
the particular identification of the biblical
Page 15
Benny Shanon
Biblical Entheogens: a Speculative Hypothesis 65
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
tree might be unsettled, it is a fact that some
acacia subspecies that grow in the region do
contain DMT.
The acacia tree is mentioned again in later
Jewish texts. In the Talmud (Tractate Gittin,
69b) it is noted that the sap of Acacia serves
as a medicine. In another context, the Talmud
explains that the word shittim is derived
from the word shtut (nonsense) (Tractate
Sanhedrin, 106a). Is this an allusion to the
psychological modifications that this plant
can induce? Curiously, after enumerating the
medicinal qualities of the plant, one Talmudic
interpreter notes that some say that this is
the sneh [the aforementioned bush from the
biblical story] in biblical language (see Krispil
1988). Elsewhere in the Talmud (Tractate
Avoda Zara, 24b) as well as in the early
Jewish hermeneutical texts (Genesis Rabbah,
54) the following extolling poem appears
(cited in Elior 2004, p. 252):
Sing, O sing, acacia tree
Ascend in all thy gracefulness
With golden weave they cover thee,
The devir
6
palace hears thy eulogy
With diverse jewels art thou adorned.
While, to my knowledge, there are no
contemporary data on medicinal or
psychoactive use of acacia in the Near East,
such use is encountered in South America.
The indigenous people of the Brazilian state
of Pernambuco use the bark of the roots
of one species of acacia, Mimosa hostilis
(Mimosaceae) in entheogenic ceremonies;
in the local dialect it is called jurema (see de
Mota 1979, 2005). As explained above in
conjunction with Ayahuasca, for the DMT in
jurema to have an effect, a second plant, one
containing MAO inhibitors, must be added to
it. Dr. Grünewald, a Brazilian anthropologist
who participated in jurema ceremonies,
investigated the matter and could not
discover any other plant admixture (see
Grünewald 2005). I, with him, leave the issue
open.
The acacia was regarded as sacred by
the ancient Egyptians. In their mythologies
the tree enjoys a very special status, being
associated with the birth of the god Osiris
and of that of the pharaohs (Helck 1975).
Osiris was said to have been killed by being
enclosed in a coffin from which an acacia
tree sprouted; out of this tree Osiris (in
other versions, Horus) came out to life.
Indeed, the ancient Egyptians regarded
acacia as the “tree of life” as well as a divine
hypostasis (Koemoth 1994). Later legends
linked the acacia tree with death and the
afterlife. According to the “Book of the
Dead” some children lead the deceased
to the tree, and coffin texts describe that
parts of it were squashed and bruised by
the deceased, and then employed with
magical healing effects (see <www.pantheon.
org/articles/a/acacia.html>). Indeed, acacia
served the ancient Egyptians for a variety of
medicinal usages, and they also used it for
the construction of sarcophagi (Krispil 1988).
Moses, we may recall, came from Egypt, and
some have even speculated that he was an
Egyptian prince (see Freud 1953 [1939]).
These ancient Egyptian myths and
legends are pertinent to our discussion
here in still another respect. Manifestly, it is a
myth of death and rebirth (and in fact it has
been suggested that it is at the root of the
Christian theology of resurrection as well).
Death and rebirth are key facets of both the
ayahuasca experience and the Amerindian
lore associated with it. Recall that the name
Ayahuasca means the vine of death.
7
Page 16
66 Biblical Entheogens: A Speculative Hypothesis
Benny Shanon
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
Recently, a personal communication
came to my attention of the Israeli painter
Ron Gang. Gang specializes in the painting of
acacia trees in the desert areas of southern
Israel (see www.rongang.net and Figure
2). He notes that Bedouins have told him
that they have the traditional custom of
conducting oathmaking rituals under these
trees. Lastly, and directly related to the old
Egyptian myths, is the use of acacia branches
as a central symbol of Freemasonry (Pike
1871).
Acacia and Harmal
Connecting the different threads of our
discussion together, let me consider the
two plants, acacia and harmal, in tandem.
Recall that the key psychoactive molecules
of the Ayahuasca vine are harmine and
harmaline, whose name is derived from that
of the Mideastern bush harmal. Following
my acquaintance with the Brazilian acacia
species jurema, I learned that the seeds of
Peganum harmala can be added to jurema
and thus a brew can be prepared which, like
Ayahuasca, is a mixture of DMT and MAO
inhibitors. In a private setting in Brazil, I have
partaken of such a brew. Unlike mushrooms,
peyote or San Pedro (Trichocerus pachanoi,
the South American cactus rich in mescaline)
which induce very different psychological
experiences, the jurema-cum-peganum
concoction impressed me (as well as several
other people I have conversed with, all
having extensive familiarity with Ayahuasca)
as exhibiting a definite resemblance to
Ayahuasca. One might say that even though
the experiences induced by the two potions
are not identical, the feeling is that they
both belong to the same family. By way of
Figure 2 ‘Acacia’, a painting by Ron Gang (courtesy of Ron Gang)
Page 17
Benny Shanon
Biblical Entheogens: a Speculative Hypothesis 67
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
analogy, I would say that the Ayahuasca and
jurema brews are similar in the way red and
white wines are similar to one another, and
different from other major entheogens in a
manner analogous to the way wines differ
from other alcoholic beverages.
Other Cases
There are several additional cases in ancient
Israelite and Jewish history in which the use
of psychoactive plants other than harmal
or acacia is suggested; the first two cases
involve biblical stories, the others concern
post-biblical reports and exegesis.The topics
of these additional cases are neither harmal
nor shittim, but they are all suggestive that
the ancient Israelites regarded psychoactive
plants in high esteem.
The first story concerns Rachel, Jacob’s
beloved wife. Jacob loved Rachel much more
than he did Leah, her sister whom his father-
in-law obliged him to marry as well.“But
when the Lord saw that Leah was hated, he
opened her womb, but Rachel was barren”
(Genesis 29:31).“And when Rachel saw that
she bare Jacob no children, Rachel envied her
sister; and said unto Jacob, Give me children
or else I die” (Genesis 30:1). All this is the
direct background to our episode, which
goes as follows:
And Reuben [Jacob’s first son, whose
mother is Leah] went in the days of wheat
harvest, and found mandrakes in the field,
and brought them unto his mother Leah.
Then Rachel said to Leah: Give me, I pray
thee, of thy son’s mandrakes. And she
said unto her: Is it a small matter that thou
hast taken my husband? and wouldest
thou take away my son’s mandrakes also?
And Rachel said,Therefore he shall lie
with thee tonight for thy son’s mandrakes.
(Genesis 30: 14–15)
This story is truly amazing. After the biblical
text makes it very clear that the most
important thing in Rachel’s life was the love
of her husband whom she had to share with
her hated sister, we are told that this very
Rachel is willing to sacrifice her relationship
with her husband in order to obtain some
mandrakes. Furthermore, it is noted that
Leah, too, greatly cherished the mandrakes,
for she compares the taking away of these to
the taking away of Jacob, the target of rivalry
and animosity between the two sisters.
Apparently, the reason the narrator inserts
this episode within the main story, whose
subject matter is Jacob’s relationship with
his wives and the manner in which his sons
(the founders of the twelve tribes of Israel)
were begotten, is to indicate how valuable
mandrakes were in early Israelite society.
Mandrakes are, of course, highly psychoactive
(see, for instance, Schultes and Hofmann
1992).
The second biblical story is the Ur-story
of them all, that of the Tree of Knowledge.
This is one of the most important episodes
in the Old Testament, and one of the most
intriguing, and the literature about it is
vast. Here, let me confine myself to two
observations that directly concern the topic
of entheogens.The first observation has to
do with the cultural beliefs that the story
presupposes. Whatever the interpretation
one gives to this pivotal story, one thing is
clear—it is being told in a context in which
people believed that knowledge could
be obtained by means of the ingestion of
plant material. The second observation
concerns the striking similarities between
Page 18
68 Biblical Entheogens: A Speculative Hypothesis
Benny Shanon
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
this biblical story and Amerindian Ayahuasca
mythologies. Ayahuasca is associated with
more mythologies than any other South
American psychoactive agent. In particular,
there are many mythological accounts of
the origin of the brew. I attribute this to the
fact that the discovery of this brew is indeed
mind-boggling. As noted above,Ayahuasca
requires the combination of two plants,
each of which alone does not produce a
psychedelic effect.The Amazonian forest
is so abundant that it is extremely unlikely
that the combination could have been
discovered by means of a simple method of
trial and error. As acknowledged by several
modern scientists, the discovery presents
an enigma (see Furst 1976; Naranjo 1983;
Narby 1998). Different Amerindian tribes
have different stories about the origins of
Ayahuasca. However, an examination of
about ten such stories that I have found in
the anthropological literature reveals some
common themes.These include snakes and
an act of a crime, usually an illicit sexual
act. Furthermore, the first encounter with
Ayahuasca is usually characterized as a
cataclysmic event. Before, human life was
paradisiacal—people lived in harmony
with nature, all their basic survival needs
were readily provided for, and they could
also converse with the animals; since the
appearance of Ayahuasca, human life has
involved work and struggle.The discovery of
Ayahuasca is also regarded as the birth of
human culture. For instance, with it people
discovered knowledge, their tribal identity,
marital laws, and music (see, for instance,
Reichel-Dolmatoff 1975 and Luna and White
2000).The resemblance to the biblical story
of the Tree of Knowledge requires no further
comment.
The next case is that of the incense
employed in the Temple of Jerusalem (the
ktoret, also known as ktoret ha-samim, the
incense of drugs).This incense contained a
series of ingredients, the identity of most
not known to us today. Its recipe was held
secret, known only to one priestly family,
and with the destruction of the Temple it
was lost.The ktoret was used daily in regular
temple services, but only once a year was
it offered inside the Holy of Holies, the
inner sanctum of the Temple.This was done
alone, by the High Priest, on Yom Kippur,
the holiest day in the Jewish calendar.The
Talmud narrates that there was a danger
the High Priest might not return sound and
well, and that therefore a chain of fine gold
was attached to his robe trailing outside for
others to monitor his well-being. Drawing on
a phonological similarity of the word “ktoret”
and the Hebrew word for “connectivity,” the
Zohar, the great kabbalistic text, explains that
the ktoret established a connection between
God and Man.
The sacred incense is also at the center
of two other episodes from the life of
Moses, both involved transgression with
fatal consequences. In the first, Nadab and
Abihu, the sons of Aaron, the first High Priest
and Moses’ brother, offered the incense not
according to the regulations and without
permit, and were immediately killed by fire
that came out of the ktoret (Leviticus 10:
1–7).The second episode concerns the
revolt by the priest family of Korah against
the authority of Moses; this revolt too
involved an illicit use of the incense.The
revolutionaries were punished by death,
and later an epidemic broke out among the
people. Aaron cured the afflicted using the
incense (Numbers 16–17). Bringing the two
Page 19
Benny Shanon
Biblical Entheogens: a Speculative Hypothesis 69
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
episodes together, later Jewish scholars and
kabbalists explained that the ktoret was a
drug both deadly and of great healing power.
For quite some time now, it has been
suggested that the term ‘cannabis’ is a
cognate of the Hebrew term knei bosem,
which means fragrant reeds and is indicated
as one of the ingredients of the sacred
incense employed first in the tabernacle and
later in the two temples of Jerusalem (for
the original hypothesis, see Benetowa 1967
[1936]; for further discussion, see Bennett
and McQueen 2001).Very recently, I have
been told of a yet unpublished research
project currently conducted by Mechoulam
and Moussaieff (personal communication).
These Israeli pharmacologists have
discovered that the Boswellia resin is a
mild psychoactive agent.This resin, levona
in Hebrew, was a major component of the
incense burned in the Jewish Temple in
Jerusalem. It was also used in religious rituals
by the ancient Egyptians and Greeks, as well
as from the fourth century by Christians.
Yet another curious piece of information is
encountered in the writings of first-century
Jewish historian Josephus Flavius who
mentions that on the mitre of the Jewish
High Priest there was golden image of the
plant Hyoscyamus.This plant is known to be
highly psychoactive (see Schleiffer 1979, pp.
169–70).
Lastly, after this paper had been written,
I asked an orthodox Jew well versed in
the rabbinical and kabbalistic literature to
read it.
8
He directed me to the writings of
Rabbeinu Be'cha'yei ben Asher, a medieval
Jewish scholar (1255–1340) famous for
his interpretation of the Torah. Rabbeinu
Be'cha'yei writes that the purest of foods
were created at the very beginning of
Creation in order to allow for the attainment
of higher knowledge. He explicitly relates
this to the biblical tree of knowledge,
and comments further that such higher
knowledge can also be gained through
the use of drugs and medicines available
at his time. In addition he notes that the
Manna had such qualities as well (recalling
the contemporary work of Merkur on the
Manna as an entheogen mentioned earlier in
this paper).
Biblical Entheogens: a Speculative
Conclusion
By way of conclusion, let me summarize
the line of argumentation presented here.
In the southern regions of the Holy Land
and in the Sinai peninsula there grow two
plants containing the molecules that together
constitute the key ingredients of one of the
most powerful psychedelic substances in
existence, the Amazonian brew Ayahuasca.
One plant is Peganum harmala, harmal in
Arabic, the other is Acacia, shita (plural,
shittim) in Hebrew; they contain beta-
carbolines and DMT, respectively. In the Bible,
there are no indications of the use of the
first plant, but there is clear evidence that
the second plant was most valued. From it
were made the tabernacle and the ark in
which the Mosaic Tablets of the Law were
guarded.The acacia tree was also regarded as
sacred by the ancient Egyptians. Nowadays,
traditional Arab and Bedouin healers employ
both plants in their curative practices.
Likewise, Jews throughout the Middle East
use harmal in various forms for medicine and
sorcery.
In the Bible we discover clear indications
that psychoactive plants were highly valued in
ancient Israelite society. Remarkably, several
Page 20
70 Biblical Entheogens: A Speculative Hypothesis
Benny Shanon
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
key episodes in the life of Moses exhibit
features that are prominent symptoms of
the Ayahuasca experience.These episodes
include Moses’ first encounter with the
Divine and the Theophany at Mt. Sinai,
traditionally regarded to be the most
important event in all of Jewish history. Later
Jewish rabbinical and mystical texts lend
further support for the present entheogenic
hypothesis.
Taken together, the botanical and
anthropological data on the one hand, and
the biblical descriptions as well as later
Jewish hermeneutics on the other, are, I
propose, suggestive of a biblical entheogenic
connection. Admittedly, the smoking gun is
not available to us. However, so many clues
present themselves which, like the pieces
of a jigsaw puzzle, seem to cohere into an
intriguing unified whole. I leave it to the
reader to pass his or her judgment.
Acknowledgements
I thank Dr. Mina Paran and Profs. Avinoam
Danin, Rachel Elior, Orli Goldwasser and
Raphael Meshoulam as well as Ittai Meyer
and Yaron Manossi for helpful discussions.
I am especially grateful for my diligent
student assistants who have helped in the
preparation of the various versions of the
manuscript—Yoel Strimling, Eran Laish,Yoed
Kenett, Dani Shavit and Gil Rubin. I also
acknowledge the kind permission of Ron
Gang for the reproduction of his painting and
of Prof. Avinoam Danin for the use of his
flora photography.
Notes
1 A good number of years passed between the
conception of the ideas presented in this paper
and their coming out in print.To a great extent
this is due to the non-orthodox, iconoclastic
nature of the thesis suggested here. I appreciate
the open-mindedness of the editors of Time
& Mind in dealing with this paper. An aural
presentation of these materials was delivered at
the Conference on Entheogenesis in Vancouver in
February, 2004.
2 After all, would one ever conceive writing about
music without ever having heard music him/her-
self?
3 However, there are reports that at sufficiently
high dosages the harmaline alkaloids can produce
hallucinations even without the addition of DMT
(see Shanon 2002a; Ott 1993).
4 This is a play on words.The text means both ‘The
brew is force’, etc., and ‘Give me force’, etc.
5 These restrictions are with reason.They come by
way of minimizing adverse physiological reactions
as well as physical malaise during the course of
the inebriation.
6 The devir is the inner sanctum, the holy of holies, of
the Jewish temple.
7 Interestingly, the Greek myths associated with the
mysteries of Eleusis mentioned above also have
death and rebirth as their main theme (Wasson,
Kramrisch, Ott, and Ruck 1986).
8 This person did not want his name to appear in
print.
References
Allegro, J.M., 1970. The Sacred Mushroom and the
Cross: A Study of the Nature and Origins of Christianity
within the Fertility Cults of the Ancient Near East.
Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Alon,A., 1993. Fauna and Flora of the Land of Israel.
Tel Aviv: Ministry of Defense Publishing House. [In
Hebrew].
Benetowa, S., 1967 [1936].“Tracing One Word
through Different Languages,” in G. Andrews and S.
Vinkenoog (eds.), The Book of Grass: An Anthology
of Indian Hemp (pp. 15–18). New York, NY: Grove
Press.
Page 21
Benny Shanon
Biblical Entheogens: a Speculative Hypothesis 71
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
Bennett, C., and McQueen, N., 2001. Sex, Drugs,
Violence and the Bible. Gibson, British Columbia:
Forbidden Fruit.
Celdrán, J. and Ruck, C.A.P., 2002.“Daturas for the
Virgin.” Entheos 1: 49–74.
da Mota, C.N., 1979. Jurema’s Children in the Forest
of Spirits: Healing and Ritual Among Two Brazilian
Indigenous Groups. Essex: ITDG Publishing.
da Mota, C.N., 2005.“Jurema e identidades: Um
ensaio sobre a diáspora de uma planta,” in B.C.
Labate and W. Sena Araújo (eds.), O Uso ritual das
plantas de poder. Campinas, SP: Mercado de Letras,
pp. 219–38.
Danin,A., 1983. Desert Vegetation of Israel and Sinai.
Jerusalem: Cana Publishing.
Dannaway, F.R., Piper,A., and Webster, P., 2006.“Bread
of Heaven or Wines of Light: Enthogenic Legacies
and Esoteric Cosmologies.” Journal of Psychoactive
Drugs 38: 493–503.
de Félice, P., 1970 [1936]. Poisons sacrés, ivresses
divines: Essai sur quelques formes inférieures de la
mystique. Paris: Albin Michel.
Devereux, P., 1997. The Long Trip: A Prehistory of
Psychedelia. Harmondsworth: Penguin/Arkana.
Dobkin de Rios, M. 1972. Visionary Vine: Hallucinogenic
Healing in the Peruvian Amazon. San Francisco, CA:
Chandler.
Dobkin de Rios, M., 1984. Hallucinogens: Cross-Cultural
Perspectives. Albuquerque, NM: University of New
Mexico Press.
Dobkin de Rios, M., 1992. Amazonian Healer: The
Life and Times of an Urban Shaman. Bridport, England:
Prism Press.
Duke, J.A., 1983. Medicinal Plants of the Bible. Owerri,
NY: Trado-Medic Books.
Elior, R., 2004. The Three Temples: On the Emergence
of Jewish Mysticism. Oxford: Littman Library of Jewish
Civilization.
Emboden,W.A., 1972. Narcotic Plants. New York, NY:
Macmillan.
Emboden,W.A., 1981.“Transcultural Use of Narcotic
Water Lilies in Ancient Egyptian and Maya Drug
Ritual.” Journal of Ethnopharmacology 3: 39–83.
Emboden,W.A., 1982.“The Mushroom and the
Water Lily: Literary and Pictorial Evidence for
Nymphaea as a Ritual Psychotogen in Mesoamerica.”
Journal of Ethnopharmacology 5, 139–48.
Emboden,W.A. and Dobkin de Rios, M., 1981.
“Mayan-Egyptian Uses of Water-Lilies (Nymphaceae)
in Shamanic Ritual Drug Use,” in G.G. Meyer, K. Blum,
and J.G. Cull (eds.), Folk Medicine and Herbal Healing.
Springfield: Charles C.Thomas, pp. 275–86.
Feliks,Y., 1994. Fruit Trees in the Bible and Talmudic
Literature. Jerusalem: Rubin Mass Press [in Hebrew].
Feliks,Y., 1997. Trees: Aromatic, Ornamental and of the
Forest in the Bible and Rabbinic Literature. Jerusalem:
Rubin Mass Press [in Hebrew].
Flattery, D. and Schwartz, M., 1989. Haoma and
Harmaline: The Botanical Identity of the Indo-Iranian
Sacred Hallucinogen “Soma” and its Legacy in Religion,
Language, and Middle Eastern Folklore [Near Eastern
Studies (Vol. 21)]. Berkeley, CA: University of
California Press.
Forte, R., (ed.), 1997. Entheogens and the Future
of Religion. San Francisco, CA: Council on Spiritual
Practices.
Freud, S., 1953 [1939]. Moses and Monotheism.
Standard edn,Vol. 23. London: Hogarth.
Furst, P.T., 1976. Hallucinogens and Culture. San
Francisco, CA: Chandler & Sharp.
Furst, P.T. (ed.), 1990. Flesh of the Gods: The Ritual
Use of Hallucinogens. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland
Press.
Gosso, F. and Camilla, G., 2007. Allucinogeni
e cristianesimo: Evidenze nell’arte sacra. Milan:
Cooperativa Colibri.
Grünewald, R., 2005.“Sujeitos da jurema e o resgate
da ciencia do indio,” in B.C. Labate and. S.L. Goulart
(eds.), O uso ritual das plantas de poder. Campinas, SP:
Mercado de Letras, pp. 239–78.
Page 22
72 Biblical Entheogens: A Speculative Hypothesis
Benny Shanon
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
Harner, M. J. 1972. The Jivaro. London: R. Hale.
Harner, M.J. (ed.), 1973. Hallucinogens and
Shamanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Helck,W., 1975.“Akazie,” in W. Helck and W.
Westendorf (eds.), Lexikon der Aegyptologie, Band I.
Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
Huxley,A., 1971. The Doors of Perception and Heaven
and Hell. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
James,W., 1929. Varieties of Religious Experience. New
York, NY: Modern Library.
Jesse, R., 2001.“On Nomenclature,” in T. Roberts
(ed.), Psychoactive Sacramentals: Essays on Entheogens
and Religion, San Francisco, CA: Council on Spiritual
Practices, pp. 225–32.
Koemoth, P., 1994. Osiris et les arbres. Ličge:
Université de Ličge.
Krispil, N., 1988. A Bag of Plants. Arad: Yara. [In
Hebrew].
La Barre,W., 1972. The Ghost Dance: Origins of
Religion. New York, NY: Delta.
Labate, B.C. and Sena Araújo,W. (eds.), 2002. O uso
ritual da Ayahuasca. Campinas, Brazil: Mercado de
Letras.
Labate, B.C., and Goulart, S.L. (eds.). (2005). O uso
ritual das plantas de poder. Campinas, Brazil: Mercado
de Letras.
Langdon, E.J., 1979.“Yagé among the Siona: Cultural
patterns in visions,” in D. Browman and R. Schwartz
(eds.), Spirits, Shamans and Stars.The Hague: Mouton
Publishers, pp. 63–82.
Langdon, E.J. and Baer, G. (eds.), 1992. Portals of
Power: Shamanism in South America. Albuquerque:
University of New Mexico Press.
Luna, L.E., 1986. Vegetalismo Shamanism Among
the Mestizo Population of the Peruvian Amazon.
Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Luna, L.E. and Amaringo, P., 1991. Ayahuasca Visions:
The Religious Iconography of a Peruvian Shaman.
Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
Luna, L.E. and White, S. (eds.), 2000. Ayahuasca
Reader: Encounters with the Amazon’s Sacred Vine.
Santa Fe, NM: Synergetic Press.
MacRae, E., 1992. Guiado Pela Lua: Xamanismo e Uso
Ritual da Ayahuasca no Culto do Santo Daime. Săo
Paulo: Editora Brasilense.
Maimonides, M., 1963. Guide to the Perplexed.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
McKenna,T., 1992. Food of the Gods: The Search for
the Original Tree of Knowledge. New York: Bantam.
Merkur, D., 1985. Becoming Half Hidden: Shamanism
and Initiation among the Inuit. Stockholm: Almqvist &
Wiskell International.
Merkur, D., 2001. The Psychedelic Sacrament.
Rochester,VT: Park Street Press.
Naranjo, P., 1983. Ayahuasca, Etnomedicina y
Mitología. Quito: Ediciones Libri Mundi.
Narby, J., 1998. The Cosmic Serpent: DNA and the
Origins of Knowledge. New York: Jeremy P.Tarcher.
Ott, J., 1993. Pharmacotheon: Entheogenic Drugs, their
Plant Sources and History. Kennewick,WA: Natural
Products.
Ott, J., 1994. Ayahuasca Analogues: Pangean
Entheogens. Kennewick,WA: Natural Products.
Ott, J., 1995. The Age of Entheogenes & the Angels’
Dictionary. Kennewick,WA: Natural Products.
Ott, J., 1996.“Entheogens II: On Entheology and
Ethnobotany.” Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 28:
205–9.
Ott, J. and Wasson, R.G., 1983.“Carved ‘Disembodied
Eyes’ of Teotihuacan.” Botanical Museum Leaflets 29:
387–400.
Pahnke,W.N., 1972.“Drugs and Mysticism,” in
J. White (ed.), The Highest State of Consciousness.
Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Palevitch, D., and Yaniv, Z., 1991. Medical Plants of the
Holy Land. Tel Aviv: Tammuz-Modan. [In Hebrew]
Payaguaje, F., 1983. El Bebedor de Yajé. Quito: Libri
Mundi.
Pike,A., 1871. Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and
Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. Charleston.
Polari,A., 1999. Forest of Visions: Ayahuasca,
Amazonian Spirituality, and the Santo Daime Tradition.
Rochester,VT: Park Street Press.
Page 23
Benny Shanon
Biblical Entheogens: a Speculative Hypothesis 73
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
Reichel-Dolmatoff, G., 1971. Amazonian Cosmos: The
Sexual and Religious Symbolism of the Tukano Indians.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Reichel-Dolmatoff, G., 1975. The Shaman and the
Jaguar: A Study of Narcotic Drugs among the Indians in
Colombia. Philadelphia. PA: Temple University Press.
Reichel-Dolmatoff, G., 1978. Beyond the Milky Way:
Hallucinatory Imagery of the Tukano Indians. Los
Angeles: UCLA Latin America Center.
Ripinsky-Naxon, M., 1998.“Shamanistic knowledge
and cosmology,” in H. Wautischer (ed.), Tribal
Epistemologies: Essays in the Philosophy of
Anthropology. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 119–61.
Roberts,T. (ed.), 2001. Psychoactive Sacramentals:
Essays on Entheogens and Religion. San Francisco, CA:
Council on Spiritual Practices.
Ruck, C.A.P., 2006. Sacred Mushrooms of the Goddess
and Secrets of Eleusis. Oakland, CA: Ronin Publishing.
Ruck, C.A.P., Bigwood, J., Staples, R.,Wasson, R., and
Ott, J., 1979.“Entheogens.” Journal of Psychedelic
Drugs 11: 145–6.
Ruck, C.A P., Staples, B.D., and Heinrich, C., 2001. The
Apples of Apollo: Pagan and Christian Mysteries of the
Eucharist. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
Rudgley, R., 1993. Essential Substances: A Cultural
History of Intoxicants in Society. London: Kodansha
International.
Schleiffer, H., 1979. Narcotic Plants of the Old World,
Used in Rituals and Everyday Life. Port Jevis, NY:
Lubrecht & Cramer.
Scholem, G., 1993. Elements of the Kabbalah and its
Symbolism. Jerusalem: Bialik Institute.
Schultes, R.E., 1972.“An Overview of Hallucinogens
in the Western Hemisphere,” in P.T. Furst (ed.), Flesh
of the Gods: The Ritual Use of Hallucinogens. New
York: Praeger, pp. 3–54.
Schultes, R.E., 1982.“The Beta-carboline
Hallucinogens of South America.” Journal of
Psychoactive Drugs 14: 205–20.
Schultes, R.E. and Hofmann,A., 1992. Plants of the
Gods: Their Sacred, Healing and Hallucinogenic Powers.
Rochester,VT: Healing Arts Press.
Schultes, R E., and Winkelman, M., 1995.“The
Principal American Hallucinogenic Plants and
their Bioactive and Therapeutic Properties,” in M.
Winkelman and W. Andritzky (eds.), Yearbook of
Cross-Cultural Medicine and Psychotherapy. Berlin:
Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung,Vol. 6, pp.
205–39.
Shanon, B., 1989.“Thought Sequences.” European
Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1: 129–59.
Shanon, B., 1998a.“Ayahuasca Visions: A
Comparative Cognitive Investigation.” Yearbook of
Ethnomedicine and the Study of Consciousness 7:
227–50.
Shanon, B., 1998b.“Ideas and Reflections
Associated with Ayahuasca Visions.” Bulletin of the
Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies 8
18–21.
Shanon, B., 1998c.“What is the Function of
Consciousness?” Journal of Consciousness Studies 5:
295–308.
Shanon, B., 2001a.“Altered Temporality.” Journal of
Consciousness Studies 8: 35–58.
Shanon, B., 2001b.“The Divine Within.” Journal of
Consciousness Studies 8: 91–6.
Shanon, B., 2002a. The Antipodes of the Mind: Charting
the Phenomenology of the Ayahuasca Experience.
Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Shanon, B., 2002b.“Ayahuasca Visualizations: A
Structural Typology.” Journal of Consciousness Studies
9: 3–30.
Shanon, B., 2002c.“Entheogens.” Journal of
Consciousness Studies 9: 85–94.
Shanon, B., 2003a.“Altered States and the Study of
Consciousness: the Case of Ayahuasca.” Journal of
Mind and Behavior 24: 125–54.
Shanon, B., 2003b.“The Biblical Merkava Vision and
Ayahuasca Visions: A Comparative Commentary.”
Studies in Spirituality 13: 31–43.
Shanon, B., 2003c.“Hallucinations.” Journal of
Consciousness Studies 10: 3–31.
Shanon, B., 2003d.“Three Stories Concerning
Synaesthesia: A Commentary on Synaesthesia
Page 24
74 Biblical Entheogens: A Speculative Hypothesis
Benny Shanon
Time and Mind Volume 1—Issue 1—March 2008, pp. 51–74
by Ramachandran and Hubbard.” Journal of
Consciousness Studies 10: 69–74.
Shanon, B., in press.“Towards a Phenomenological
Psychology of the Conscious,” in J. Stewart, O.
Gapenne, and E. di Paulo (eds.), Enaction: Towards a
New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA:
M.I.T. Press.
Shulgin,A., and Shulgin,A., 1997. Tryptamines I have
Known And Loved: The Chemistry Continues. Berkeley,
CA: Transform Press.
Smith, H., 1964.“Do Drugs Have Religious Import?”
Journal of Philosophy 61: 517–30.
Smith, H., 1976. Forgotten Truth: The Primordal
Tradition. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Smith, H., 2000. Cleansing the Doors of Perception:
The Religious Significance of Entheogenic Plants and
Chemicals. New York, NY: Jeremy P.Tarcher/Putnam.
Strassman, R., 2001. DMT the Spirit Molecule.
Rochester,VT: Park Street Press.
Walsh, R., 1990. The Spirit of Shamanism. Los Angeles,
CA: Jeremy P.Tarcher.
Wasson, R.G., 1961.“Hallucinogenic Fungi of Mexico:
An Inquiry into the Origins of the Religious Idea
Among Primitive Peoples.” Botanical Museum Leaflets
19: 137–62.
Wasson, R.G., 1968. Soma: Divine Mushroom of
Immortality. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Wasson, R.G., 1980. The Wonderous Mushroom:
Mycolatry in Mesoamerica. New York, NY: McGraw-
Hill.
Wasson, R.G., Hofmann,A., and Ruck, C.A.P.,
1978. The Road to Eleusis: Unveiling the Secret of
the Mysteries. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace,
Jovanovich.
Wasson, R.G., Kramrisch, S., Ott, J., and Ruck, C.A.P.,
1986. Persephone’s Quest: Entheogens and the Origins
of Religion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Winkelman, M., 1995.“Psychointegrator Plants: Their
Roles in Human Culture, Consciousness and Health,”
in M. Winkelman and W. Andritzky (eds.), Yearbook
of Cross-Cultural Medicine and Psychotherapy. Berlin:
Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung,Vol. 6, pp. 9–53.
Winkelman, M., 2000. Shamanism: The Neural Ecology
of Consciousness and Healing. Westport, CT: Bergin
& Garvey
Wolfson, E.R., 1994. Through a Speculum that Shines:
Vision and Imagination in Medieval Jewish Mysticism.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
 
Sep 25, 2005
1,148
1,075
0
44
#4
I haven't read all this shit but think it's an interesting subject so I posted. Will read up when I have time.
 
Jul 6, 2008
2,157
2
0
44
#6
yeaaaa ummmmm, im gonna take this read with me to the woods and sit under a tree. after that im gonna use the paper, take a shit and wipe my ass with it, like the good lord intended.
 
Sep 25, 2005
1,148
1,075
0
44
#8
yeaaaa ummmmm, im gonna take this read with me to the woods and sit under a tree. after that im gonna use the paper, take a shit and wipe my ass with it, like the good lord intended.
Thats why I provided you with a video link on the first post so you could peep game without having to read all that shit. :knockout: