Dodgers sign Jeff Kent

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
44
#1
Dodgers sign 2B Kent to two-year contract

December 9, 2004

LOS ANGELES (Ticker) - With third baseman Adrian Beltre exploring free agency, the Los Angeles Dodgers ensured there would be plenty of power in their lineup by adding veteran second baseman Jeff Kent.

On Thursday, the Dodgers signed the all-time leader in home runs among second basemen to a two-year contract.

"Adding Jeff Kent to our lineup not only gives us another major offensive force, but it provides me with flexibility in the field," Los Angeles manager Jim Tracy said. "I've always admired his competitive nature from the opposing dugout and I'm very excited that he's now a member of the Dodgers."

The 36-year-old Kent has a lifetime .289 average with 302 home runs - including 278 as a second baseman - and 1,207 RBI in 13 seasons with Toronto, the New York Mets, Cleveland, San Francisco and Houston.

Kent, who won the National League MVP Award with San Francisco in 2000, hit .289, slugged 27 homers and drove in 107 runs last season while helping Houston clinch the NL wild card.

The Southern California native hit three homers with seven RBI for the Astros in the NL Championship Series against the St. Louis Cardinals. A veteran of eight playoff series, the four-time All-Star is a career .264 hitter with eight home runs and 21 RBI in the postseason.

"Jeff has established himself as one of the best offensive players in the game," Dodgers general manager Paul DePodesta said. "He's a proven run producer with significant postseason experience and we expect him to be a huge part of the Dodgers offense next season."

Despite driving in over 100 runs for the seventh time in the last eight seasons, Kent did not have his $9 million option picked up by the Astros, who elected instead to exercise a $700,000 buyout clause in his contract.

Although his range has been reduced with age, Kent was fourth among NL second basemen last season with a .989 fielding percentage.

Kent adds some much-needed pop to Los Angeles' lineup. Even with Beltre's impressive offensive season, Los Angeles was ninth in the NL in run production and managed to score just 12 runs against St. Louis in the NL Division Series.

Last season, the Dodgers received minimal production from second baseman Alex Cora, who is known for his defensive prowess. Cora hit .264 with 10 homers and 47 RBI and batted just .133 in the playoffs.

Updated on Thursday, Dec 9, 2004 7:46 pm EST

http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=dodgerssignkent&prov=st&type=lgns
 
Mar 18, 2003
5,362
194
0
44
#2
Fuck I hope they lose Beltre. Kent tore it up with Bonds in the line up so theres no telling what will happen if Beltre has another stellar year. The Giants need to start looking for some more talent if they want to win the division because the Dodgers are looking pretty good.

The Giants did take one step forward, they let Hermanson go! YEESAEASEHAHASHD!@!~@# The Whitesox are going to pay him 5.5mil over 2 years. HAHAHAHAHAHAH!
 
Apr 25, 2002
6,082
2,253
113
46
#7
Lil Pino said:
it aint gonna happen. He's going to be traded any day now and Giles is the best we can get
Last rumor I heard was that Zito would be the one to go.

There was actually an article on Foxsports.com this afternoon saying Hudson was about to get traded but they had to change it because the Cards said they weren't close to anything. It was up for about a half hour.
 

DubbC415

Mickey Fallon
Sep 10, 2002
22,620
6,984
0
38
Tomato Alley
#8
^^^Hudson's record is like 92-39 or something like that, and i heard that it was the best record, i think of any active pitcher with that many decisions. I remember the Chronicle a few days ago said Hudson wanted to stay, and talked to Beane, but Beane told him that as much as he'd love to have him stay, business is business. I think part of the A's plan, when they re-sign people is how much they're worth in terms of being able to pay them....Hudson might be TOO GOOD for them, if u know what i mean, like Jermaine Dye was, except Dye wasnt worth the money he was asking for. The A's, sadly, have a lot of rebuilding to do.
 
Apr 25, 2002
6,082
2,253
113
46
#10
DubbC415 said:
^^^Hudson's record is like 92-39 or something like that, and i heard that it was the best record, i think of any active pitcher with that many decisions. I remember the Chronicle a few days ago said Hudson wanted to stay, and talked to Beane, but Beane told him that as much as he'd love to have him stay, business is business. I think part of the A's plan, when they re-sign people is how much they're worth in terms of being able to pay them....Hudson might be TOO GOOD for them, if u know what i mean, like Jermaine Dye was, except Dye wasnt worth the money he was asking for. The A's, sadly, have a lot of rebuilding to do.
I know what you mean, but I disagree about Dye... They paid him well and he was a bust. A better example would be Tejada, who was told he wouldn't be insulted with an offer by the A's who couldn't pay him what he deserved.

They always have a good team, and are always a factor in the AL West, but every year they're 1 or 2 players away from getting to the next level.
 
Apr 25, 2002
6,082
2,253
113
46
#11
Hudson to the Dodgers!!

FUCKFUCKFUCKFUCKFUCKFUCK

Well at least he's we got a starting 2B, and Huddy's going to a rival of the Giants...!