damn it feels good to be liberated!!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

28g w/o the bag

politically incorrect
Jan 18, 2003
21,677
6,953
113
metro's jurisdiction
siccness.net
#1
(from the SC board)

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-3011584,00.html

Jittery U.S. Soldiers Kill 6 Iraqis

Sunday August 10, 2003 7:39 PM


By SCHEHEREZADE FARAMARZI

Associated Press Writer

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - The night air hung like a hot wet blanket over the north Baghdad suburb of Slaykh. At 9 p.m., an electrical transformer blew up, plunging the neighborhood into darkness.

American soldiers, apparently fearing a bomb attack, went on alert. Within 45 minutes, six Iraqis trying to get home before the 11 p.m. curfew were shot and killed by U.S. forces.

Anwaar Kawaz, 36, lost her husband and three of four children. ``We kept shouting, 'We're a family! Don't shoot!' But no one listened. They kept shooting,'' she told The Associated Press.

When asked about the shootings, Lt. Col. Guy Shields, coalition military spokesman, said, ``Our checkpoints are usually marked and our soldiers are trained and disciplined. I will check on that. That is serious.''

Confronted by daily guerrilla attacks that have claimed 56 American lives since May 1, U.S. troops are on edge. Iraqis complain that many innocent people have died at surprise U.S. checkpoints thrown up on dark streets shortly before the curfew. Drivers hurrying home say they don't see the soldiers or hear their orders to stop.

The Kawaz family left the home of Anwaar's parents on Bilal Habashi Street at 9:15 p.m. for the 10-minute drive home. They had traveled only a half-mile when they reached the intersection where they said the American bullets took their terrible toll.

A few yards in front of them, two soldiers standing near two Humvees were shooting at the family's white Volkswagen, she said. Two other soldiers near a Humvee to the right of the car also fired, she said.

Witnesses told the AP one of the soldiers fell to the ground screaming in pain, apparently a victim of friendly fire.

``They killed us. There was no signal. Nothing at all. We didn't see anything but armored cars,'' Anwaar said Sunday, two days after the confrontation.

``Our headlights were on. He (her husband) didn't have time to put his foot on the brake. They kept shooting. He was shot in the forehead. I was still sitting next to him. I got out of the car to get help. I was shouting, 'Help me! Help me!' No one came.''

Witnesses said her husband, Adel Kawaz, survived for at least an hour, still sitting in the car after being hit in the head and back.

Ibrahim Arslan, whose house is on the corner where the Kawaz car came under fire, said Kawaz cried out for help.

Arslan said he and a neighbor tried to remove the wounded Kawaz from the car, but the door was jammed. Then they fled when automatic rifle fire again split the air.

``The next day we heard he had died,'' Arslan said.

Ali Taha, who lives across the street, said Haydar Kawaz, 18, was sitting up in the back of the car with a bullet wound in his head. His sister, 17-year-old Olaa, slumped dead into his arms.

When the shooting stopped and the American soldiers were gone, Taha said, he and other neighbors ventured out about 11 p.m. and took the bodies of the brother and sister from the car, placed them on the pavement and covered them with a sheet.

The Americans had taken the bodies of Adel, the husband, and another child, 8-year-old Mirvet. Two days later, the family still did not know where the bodies were taken.

A fourth child, a 13-year-old Hadeel, survived.

``I was sitting in the middle, between my brother Haydar and sister Olaa,'' Hadeel said, her head bandaged.

``I felt blood coming down my head. I tried to drag myself out of the car. An American pulled me out. I kept telling them that my father and my brother were in the car. There was a translator with them.

``My father was shouting, 'We are still alive!' but no went to help him.

``The Americans told me to go with them but I was afraid they would hurt me. I didn't trust them. So I ran to my grandparents' house,'' Hadeel said. She told the story sitting in her grandparents' home, crying quietly, surrounded by family.

Lt. Sean McLaughlin, stationed at a base near Slaykh, could only express sympathy, although he said his unit was not involved.

``No one feels worse than us. We want to build a safe Iraq for the Iraqis. It's a difficult situation here,'' McLaughlin said.

A few blocks from where the car was shot up, 19-year-old Sayf Ali was shot and killed as he drove home with a cousin and a friend. He, too, didn't see the American checkpoint, survivors in the car said. Soldiers opened fire on the blue Opel station wagon, which kept moving after Ali was shot. The cousin and the friend jumped out. Soldiers kept firing until the car caught fire incinerating Ali's body, according to one of the witnesses, Arslan.

About the same time nearby, Ali Salman, 31, was driving home, also unaware of the unannounced American checkpoints. He apparently didn't see the soldiers either and was killed.

Ghaleb Laftah, 24, who was sitting in the back of Salman's Honda, and Wisam Sabri, sitting in the front passenger seat, were wounded.

``There was no light. We didn't see the Americans,'' said Laftah, limping from a leg injury as he walked to Salman's wake that was being held under a tent on Bilal Habashi Street.

``We didn't hurt anyone. We didn't break the law,'' Laftah said, speaking with difficulty because of four broken teeth from the shooting.

``My son, ... the Americans killed him,'' said Salman's father, Hikmat, who broke down in sobs. ``He was on his way home and was caught up in the shooting. He was afraid, got out of the car and they still shot him. He was frightened, then he died. I only have one (son),'' he said.

Family members were also holding a wake for Sayf Ali. The men sat under a tent outside the house and the women were indoors, according to Iraqi tradition.

Sabah Azawmi, an uncle and a Sunni Muslim, said his tribe would seek revenge on the Americans.

``They set fire to the car while he was inside,'' said Azawmi.

``They are terrified of the Iraqis. If they weren't afraid, they wouldn't behave this way,'' he said.

But Hikmat Salman, Ali Salman's father and a Shiite Muslim, said he was not interested in revenge. He said he would leave that to God.

The Kawaz family, also Shiites, also said they would leave revenge to God.

``I wish Saddam (Hussein) would return and kill all Americans,'' Anwaar Kawaz said. Under Saddam, ``we used to go out at one in the morning. We went out at 9 now and they killed us.

``I want to drink Bush's blood. They are all criminals,'' she said, beating her chest.
 
Dec 27, 2002
459
1
0
#2
Funny how so many cats entertain themselves every single day with violence in movies, video games, music and television, and then post shit like this on a message board as if they are "outraged" at acts of real life violence.

Why are they not entertained by real life violence too? Why draw a line and where is that muthafucka?

(I aint saying that *you* are "outraged", SGC, since all you did was provide the article, I am referring to these flip flop cats that go from gangsta rap groupies to political self-righteous zealots in their posts.)
 
Jul 7, 2002
3,105
0
0
#3
Vyasadeva said:
Funny how so many cats entertain themselves every single day with violence in movies, video games, music and television, and then post shit like this on a message board as if they are "outraged" at acts of real life violence.

Why are they not entertained by real life violence too? Why draw a line and where is that muthafucka?
you know there is a difference between violence in the movie, tv, and the shit that is going down in iraq...did you know that?...the war is effecting ppl lives.....


i dont get entertain by reading this...
 
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
48
www.soundclick.com
#5
That difference is called entertainment, whether it's violent or not. It shouldn 't be taken out of it's context.

Think of it as comedy, I don't care if it's mean, real, or dirty, just as long as it makes me laugh....
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#6
``I wish Saddam (Hussein) would return and kill all Americans,'' Anwaar Kawaz said. Under Saddam, ``we used to go out at one in the morning. We went out at 9 now and they killed us.

``I want to drink Bush's blood. They are all criminals,'' she said, beating her chest.



ILL


:H:
 
Dec 27, 2002
459
1
0
#7
*WHY* is violence ENTERTAINING?

If seeing a person get shot in a movie ENTERTAINS you, then why when you walk out of the theater is it NOT entertaining to see someone shot in front of you?

So if someone has your attitude, then it doesn't matter if they tell spic, nigger, cracker or gook jokes as long as it makes them laugh. That shit is cool with you?
 

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#8
HEY I JUST WANTED TO SAY THANKS TO THE AMERICAN SOLDIERS THAT LIBERATED IRAQ. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK G.I.JOKES.

THANKS FOR LIBERATING ME ALSO. NOW I CAN PLAY THE MOST VIOLENT GAMES AND WATCH HORRIFIC MOVIES. ALL AT YOUR EXPENSE...ALL BECAUSE YOU FOUGHT FOR *MY* RIGHTS....

DOING ALL OF THIS AS I SIT BACK PLAY AND WATCH ON A NICE COLOR TV...DVD AND VCR COMBO I MIGHT ADD...


:h:
 
Jun 10, 2002
459
37
0
43
#9
Funny how so many cats entertain themselves every single day with violence in movies, video games, music and television, and then post shit like this on a message board as if they are "outraged" at acts of real life violence.

Why are they not entertained by real life violence too? Why draw a line and where is that muthafucka?
First of all if you cant distinguish the difference between movie and real life than somethin wrong with you. The important thing to remember Vyasadeva about a movie is that it's fake. People arent really dying. So yeah, i could say its entertaining to watch a movie that has violence if it has a good plot. I know the people arent really dying so what the fuck.

you know there is a difference between violence in the movie, tv, and the shit that is going down in iraq...did you know that?...the war is effecting ppl lives.....
he is right.

If seeing a person get shot in a movie ENTERTAINS you, then why when you walk out of the theater is it NOT entertaining to see someone shot in front of you?
one reason......death in a movie is part of entertainment, it always has. Seeing someone shot right in front of you is reality, very much different than a movie.

What's happening in iraq is reality not a movie. So its not entertaining to find out that innocent people are being killed because of a curfew (whether it be iraqis, koreans, africans or cambodians the shit aint coo)....little kids, and women getting shot. Then to top it off, the car gets shot until it catches on fire and incinerates the dead, or the soldiers take the body away. I couldnt even imagine what it would be like to be in their families position.

HEY I JUST WANTED TO SAY THANKS TO THE AMERICAN SOLDIERS THAT LIBERATED IRAQ. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK G.I.JOKES.
Its probably not the soldiers fault that they liberated iraq. Probably the people giving the orders. I didnt agree with the war, but I supported the troops.
 
Nov 2, 2002
577
1
0
45
#10
America recieves the #1 bully Award. Thats exactly why people try these terrorist acts toward us, U.S. acts like we are the perfect example of how every country should be. Bush is never going to understand, especially with old dad in his ear.
 
Dec 27, 2002
459
1
0
#11
First of all if you cant distinguish the difference between movie and real life than somethin wrong with you. The important thing to remember Vyasadeva about a movie is that it's fake. People arent really dying. So yeah, i could say its entertaining to watch a movie that has violence if it has a good plot. I know the people arent really dying so what the fuck.
Don't give me this bullshit, of course I can distinguish between a movie and reality. Of course it's fake.
But you are a fuckin FOOL if you think people are only entertained by fake violence. Have you ever seen someone about to jump from a building and commit suicide? EVERY TIME, a huge crowd will gather to watch and see if he jumps. Some people will yell for him to jump. Why do people gawk at auto accidents and train wrecks and plance crashes? Those involve real death, not fake death, yet people are as riveted as they are to a movie. It is called morbid fascination.

Why the fuck do you think "Faces of Death" and Rotten.com and Ogrish.com and Al Jazeera and shit like that which shows REAL VDEO FOOTAGE of people getting killed has and will sell like hotcakes?

If people are so averse to actual real life killing and violence, then *WHY* do they tune in like programmed robots to programs which simply repeat and repeat and repeat the same grisly bloody footage? *WHY* do they search out snuff films and real footage of carnage?

*Because people are entertained by REAL LIFE death too.*

Like you, though, they mostly rationalize it away and never examine *why* they are entertained by it. "Why am I entertained by another's suffering?" Hardly anyone asks themselves this and when I ask the question you act like I don't know the difference between fiction and non-fiction.

you know there is a difference between violence in the movie, tv, and the shit that is going down in iraq...did you know that?...the war is effecting ppl lives.....

he is right.
Once again you act like I do not know there is a difference between a fictional killing and a non-fictional killing. WAKE THE FUCK UP, my question was *WHY* is violence entertaining to you? *WHY* is it entertaining to see someone get killed?

Where is your evidence that repetitive and gratuitous violence in the media does not affect people's lives? I'm sure you know that America, which allows graphic violence on TV has an exponentially larger rate of murder per capita than any other country in the world.

Just so you fucks will not repeat the same shit again, I UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FICTION AND NON-FICTION. I am asking you *WHY* you are *ENTERTAINED* by the very same thing which you claim to be *REPUSLED* by.

Sicx raps about killing babies and putting brooms in young kids ass, and that is considered entertainment. But the next day when the shit he actually did comes to light, all of the sudden it is grotesque and evil and he should die. WAIT A MINUTE, *WHY* wasn't it grotesque when he rapped about it? Since that type of thing is REALLY going on in the world, *WHY* are you entertained by a description of it?

Even if Sicx never did that shit, there are people who have done it, and families who have suffered. Do you think THEY are entertained by his music? Fuck no. But YOU are, until you find out that he really did the shit. Or maybe until someone you don't know does it to a relative of yours. Then all of the sudden your views on what is "entertaining" change.

Now once again for any slow fucks that are reading this, this is NOT directed at any particular person because I don't know or care who listens to what. But this whole rationalization being used is fuckin flimsy and paper thin.

It is more pleasurable to reside in a fantasy world than in reality. And *THAT* is why you are entertained by violence in flicks and music. Because during the time that you spend listening to whatever gangsta shit you do, or whatever gangsta movie you sit through, or whatever video game you play, for that time you suspend your disbelief and enter a fantasy world where it's COOL to shoot muthafuckas and chop em up. In this fantasy world, no one is really dying, so it's not offensive to you to see people get killed or raped. It's just make-believe, and you are entertained by it.

Do you prefer fantasy or reality?

one reason......death in a movie is part of entertainment, it always has. Seeing someone shot right in front of you is reality, very much different than a movie.
Let's look at it like this:

A person is filming his vacation on the street when all of the sudden he captures a man getting shot by another man point blank range, from about 5 feet away. Dude sees that he is being filmed so he points the heat right at the camera as if he is about to blast. Some commotion occurs and the dude doesn't shoot but runs away.

Now this vacation cat with the camera is NOT entertained by what just happened. It was REAL and he was an inch from death.

This video footage gets put on Faces of Death 426. A bunch of muthafuckas is sitting around watching the video laughing and they are being ENTERTAINED by REAL LIFE VIOLENCE.

Where is the "difference" you speak of in this instance?

What's happening in iraq is reality not a movie. So its not entertaining to find out that innocent people are being killed because of a curfew (whether it be iraqis, koreans, africans or cambodians the shit aint coo)....little kids, and women getting shot. Then to top it off, the car gets shot until it catches on fire and incinerates the dead, or the soldiers take the body away. I couldnt even imagine what it would be like to be in their families position.
OK, so listen to yourself. You are saying that death and murder and destruction are not cool. This shit is no laughing matter. Yet tomorrow you will leave all this gruesome reality behind and bump your gangsta shit, or watch a gangsta flick, or play a gangsta in a game, and you will conveniently pretend that violence is cool and fun for awhile. Then later you will watch the news, hear this story and say damn that is horrible. Then you will go back and be entertained by the same thing that is so horrible.

99% of the populus prefers fantasy over reality.

Its probably not the soldiers fault that they liberated iraq. Probably the people giving the orders. I didnt agree with the war, but I supported the troops.
I know this was directed at :H:, but I couldn't help but notice the cliche of all cliches, "I don't agree with the war, but I support the troops."

At least :H: is consistent in his disdain of all things American. This is sorta like hedging your bets.

You don't want to put yourself out there against the popular ideology of the liberal cats, so you don't agree with the war. But at the same time you mouth lip-service support for the fighting force being used by the evil right wing power monger by saying you support the troops. Because when it comes down to it, those extremist terrorists the troops are fighting hate your American guts REGARDLESS of whether you agree with the war, they would hate your guts and slice your neck even if there was no war, and the reality is that the only muthafuckas with any kind of ability to defend this patch of land and its' citizens is the troops. So of course you "support" them.

But I bet they'd say your "support" is fake entertainment, just like the violence in the movies you are entertained by.
 
Jun 10, 2002
459
37
0
43
#14
Don't give me this bullshit, of course I can distinguish between a movie and reality. Of course it's fake.
good were making progress arent we.

But you are a fuckin FOOL if you think people are only entertained by fake violence.
i dont think that. I know that there are people entertained by real life violence that results in death. I just think somethin wrong with them dumb ass.

Have you ever seen someone about to jump from a building and commit suicide?
nope. have you? oh yeah you prolly the one that yelled JUMP!!!

Why do people gawk at auto accidents and train wrecks and plance crashes? Those involve real death, not fake death, yet people are as riveted as they are to a movie. It is called morbid fascination.
blah blah blah blah......"morbid fascination", yea ok alright. not everyone reacts the way you described.

Why the fuck do you think "Faces of Death" and Rotten.com and Ogrish.com and Al Jazeera and shit like that which shows REAL VDEO FOOTAGE of people getting killed has and will sell like hotcakes?
Why the fuck do I think? you gettin heated already, damn. They sell like "hotcakes" because people like you get a kick out of'em.

Like you, though, they mostly rationalize it away and never examine *why* they are entertained by it. "Why am I entertained by another's suffering?" Hardly anyone asks themselves this and when I ask the question you act like I don't know the difference between fiction and non-fiction.
im sorry, where did i say that anothers suffering entertains me? read my post again and let it soak.

Once again you act like I do not know there is a difference between a fictional killing and a non-fictional killing. WAKE THE FUCK UP, my question was *WHY* is violence entertaining to you? *WHY* is it entertaining to see someone get killed?
its not......read my first post again, then again, and then once more.

Where is your evidence that repetitive and gratuitous violence in the media does not affect people's lives?
My evidence? WTF are u talkin about? Did I say I had evidence that violence in the media does not effect peoples lives? now your just making up shit.

Just so you fucks will not repeat the same shit again, I UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FICTION AND NON-FICTION. I am asking you *WHY* you are *ENTERTAINED* by the very same thing which you claim to be *REPUSLED* by.
Now that you understand the difference between fiction and nonfiction, why are u still askin this stupid question. Answer it yourself.

Sicx raps about killing babies and putting brooms in young kids ass, and that is considered entertainment. But the next day when the shit he actually did comes to light, all of the sudden it is grotesque and evil and he should die. WAIT A MINUTE, *WHY* wasn't it grotesque when he rapped about it? Since that type of thing is REALLY going on in the world, *WHY* are you entertained by a description of it?
For the record I think sicx was sick minded in a perverted way. His lyrics didnt entertain me.

Do you prefer fantasy or reality?
depends

Where is the "difference" you speak of in this instance?
The difference is that this was not intended to be a movie. Theres no actors, directors, or stuntmen. The camcorder caught real life violence. So now this video footage is used on a faces of death movie. The people that go out and buy or rent this movie know that this aint a fuckin fictional movie. They are buying this shit to watch it for the kicks or out of curiosity. Now if you are watching this movie because you enjoy it, than something is wrong in your head.

OK, so listen to yourself. You are saying that death and murder and destruction are not cool. This shit is no laughing matter. Yet tomorrow you will leave all this gruesome reality behind and bump your gangsta shit, or watch a gangsta flick, or play a gangsta in a game, and you will conveniently pretend that violence is cool and fun for awhile. Then later you will watch the news, hear this story and say damn that is horrible. Then you will go back and be entertained by the same thing that is so horrible.
Use some common sense and you will be able to distinguish between right and wrong, fiction and non fiction. As far as im concerned, the music i listen to is fictional unlessI know otherwise.

im done quoting your remarks, but you need to get off heresy's nuts. I aint trippin if he is consistent in his disdain of all things american. Thats him. Im against the war because of the motives and intentions behind it. I support the troops because for one, I have a friend and a relative who are in the military who are soldiers. I know that it is not the troops decision to invade or make war. They are given commands, and they have to follow them. I wish them a safe journey. Its sad that they are used at the disposal of our greedy leaders. I bet the majority of the soldiers in the military do not have the same agenda as the politics do.

oh and another thing, your a fuckin fool.
 
Dec 27, 2002
459
1
0
#15
You are what, 15? When you move out of your mommy's house, hollar and maybe we can continue this discussion.

If you didn't have a friend and relative in the army, would you still support the troops? Stop lying. Your words indicate that you are of the opinion that the world and everything in it revolves around you. With time the world has a way of showing you that it does not.

Now talking shit back and forth to a young cat like you is not what I should be doing with myself. And I shouldn't have said half the shit I did earlier. It wasn't necessary and my judgement was impaired, shall we say. But fuck it, what's done is done.

I read the story of the Iraq shooting in the paper today and it is some real tragic shit. It was not entertaining at all to read the details of the family and what is left of it. It is disturbing. And a little while ago I was at a friend's pad and I listened to Clone Gangsta Rappa #23146 (MC Eiht - Hood Arrest in particular), spit the same old same old gangsta shit about poppin some random and faceless niggas in the skull with a AK and making their families grieve. He proceeded to kill probably 1,000 more niggas on the same record, and it just didn't entertain me at all. And I have been bumping Eiht since CMW old shit. I put Eiht's 'We Come Strapped' in my top 5 favorite albums, shit is classic. I know that what Eiht spits is fictional, but it is still a reflection of truth. And the truth is that that family in Iraq and millions of other families are suffering very real trauma and tragedy due to murders just like the one Eiht is "entertaining" us with.

Truth is stranger and more wild than fiction, and I increasingly find truth (reality) more interesting and worthy of my time than fiction (fantasy). Especially when the "fake" world of movies tv and music is doing nothing but offering a lame watered down version of the real thing, reality.

Oh and another thing, I know I am a fuckin fool. My guru tells me I am fool #1.

Peace
 
Jul 24, 2002
4,878
5
0
48
www.soundclick.com
#17
Vyasadeva said:
*WHY* is violence ENTERTAINING?

If seeing a person get shot in a movie ENTERTAINS you, then why when you walk out of the theater is it NOT entertaining to see someone shot in front of you?
Maybe it's hard for you to understand what enternainment is.
At least to me, entertainment can be anything, good, bad, violent, peaceful, ect.
Just like music.

Vyasadeva said:
*
So if someone has your attitude, then it doesn't matter if they tell spic, nigger, cracker or gook jokes as long as it makes them laugh. That shit is cool with you?
Yeah, basically.
I love Dave Chappelle and Carlos Mencia's comedy.
Simply because they make fun of racism. Especially Carlos Mencia, he makes fun of every fuckin race. Why? Cuz who cares.
We are all the same....
 
Dec 27, 2002
459
1
0
#18
I don't eat chicken or want any, lil fella.

And Miggidy, I understand what "entertainment" is perfectly well. Some people are entertained by porn, some by music, some by violence, games, and billions of other things. People find escapism and "pleasure" in these things, and I understand the need to be entertained as a means of relieving the stress a wound up mind can cause. We *need* to laugh and joke and take things lightly once in a while. I understand completely the need to live in a fairy tale make believe world every now and then.

Just as the body needs sleep in order to continue functioning properly, the mind needs escapism and "pleasure" in order to keep from spiraling into despair and dementia. By being "entertained", the mind is distracted from the woes of life and the very brutal realities of life, especially death.

But this is my point, Mig. You say that anything can be entertaining, as long as *you* find it to be so. I understand that.

There are people who are entertained by images and stories of real life black people being hung and dragged from behind trucks. There are people (some even on this board) who find the crucifixion of Christ to be a joking matter and something that should be made fun of. Just like you, he will say that *he* finds it hilarious and entertaining and doesn't give a fuck what any one else says.

Now if you agree with your own philosophy that "anything can be entertainment", then you should have no objection or problem with someone laughing and being entertained by the crucifixion. If that is the case then we are on the same page and I am in agreement with you. But if you have a "problem" with a person laughing and making fun of Christ like that, or you think they "shouldn't" find humor and entertainment in the crucifixion, then you are a hypocrite because by your own words you say that "anything can be entertainment". Does that include kiddie porn, by the way?

All I am saying is that since ART imitates LIFE, *why* be entertained by a cheap IMITATION of real life violence and death, and why *not* be entertained by the REAL THING? I know why. It is because when you are entertained by something "unreal" like a movie or music, you feel no guilt, no shame about being titillated by depravity. But if you were to see the same shit happen in real life and you found yourself being entertained by it, you would feel guilty, you would feel "wrong" for being entertained by that kind of thing. So this is the rationalization for why we are entertained by the very same thing which sickens us.

At the end of the day, 100% of the population will choose a diamond over a cubic zirconia. One is real, and one is fake. Who could possibly be impressed by the sparkle of a fake jewel when there is a REAL diamond sitting right next to it?
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
49
#19
miggidy said:
Yeah, basically.
I love Dave Chappelle and Carlos Mencia's comedy.
Simply because they make fun of racism. Especially Carlos Mencia, he makes fun of every fuckin race. Why? Cuz who cares.
We are all the same....
WOULD YOU SAY THE SAME IF YOU HEARD A WHITE GUYS SAYING THOSE SAME THINGS ABOUT EVERY1???