Copyrighting one long ass track?????

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 1, 2003
6,431
25
0
53
#1
I was wondering if i could get away with copyrighting one long ass continuous track. It will be consecutive beats with track markers included. That way I pay for one copyright. The reason, I've accumulated a lot of instrumentals that I think that will work in commercials, background tracks, jingles etc. I want to market them and send them out in the mail to various places...at the same time, I want to protect them. Will this work?
 

GHP

Sicc OG
Jul 21, 2002
16,280
852
113
45
#2
you can copyright a cumliitive work but it is less safe for the person that owns the rights than to do it track by track for some reason. Copyright law is tricky though the big guys like in any legal battle always win and steal shit from little guys all the time. they have more money to invest into lawsuits and the little guy will end up losing cuz he doesnt have enough cash to defend himself in court
 
Apr 25, 2002
7,232
170
63
42
www.idealsentertainment.com
#3
If it's various tracks, you're better off copyrighting all of them separately. Thing about markers is, when you have a CD with the tracks on it, you don't see those markers. You can put each track on a CD and copyright as a cumulative work like Jayda said. It could be as safe, but sometimes it's not because you basically copyright that specific collection.

It would usually hold up in court though because it's a piece of a copyrighted work. Lawyers or not, if the paperwork is there, it's there. The problem with a lot of cats is, they try to do the broke man's copyright, and that shit just doesn't hold up in court.
 
Apr 25, 2002
2,207
2
0
#4
you can copyright a cumliitive work but it is less safe for the person that owns the rights than to do it track by track for some reason.
I don't know who told you that but it's not true. There's absolutely nothing wrong with submitting a cd split into tracks for each beat on the cd and registering the whole thing as My Neato Beats Volume 1 or whatever.

Also, when there's a clear violation of copyright, lawyers line up to take the case without advance payment.
 

28g w/o the bag

politically incorrect
Jan 18, 2003
21,677
6,953
113
metro's jurisdiction
siccness.net
#5
If it's various tracks, you're better off copyrighting all of them separately. Thing about markers is, when you have a CD with the tracks on it, you don't see those markers. You can put each track on a CD and copyright as a cumulative work like Jayda said. It could be as safe, but sometimes it's not because you basically copyright that specific collection.

It would usually hold up in court though because it's a piece of a copyrighted work. Lawyers or not, if the paperwork is there, it's there. The problem with a lot of cats is, they try to do the broke man's copyright, and that shit just doesn't hold up in court.
haha people still actually mail shit to themselves?

::
 
Apr 25, 2002
7,232
170
63
42
www.idealsentertainment.com
#6
haha people still actually mail shit to themselves?

::
You don't know how many people in the business have told me or my boys to do this. I laugh at 'em and tell 'em "Good luck with your future in music". People should have no problem paying money to protect their work, but too many cats are penny pinchers and looking for the "easy and cheap" way to do shit.

I tell newcomers "If it's important to you, pay the money and get the paperwork".