Computer study claims 1998 baseballs were juiced

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

V

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
5,308
137
0
40
#1
  • V

    V

<H1>http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2719191&campaign=rss&source=ESPNHeadlines



Study claims imaging tests show larger rubber core



CLEVELAND -- A company that uses computer imaging claims baseballs had a larger rubberized core and a synthetic rubber ring in 1998, including the ball Mark McGwire hit for his 70th homer.

Universal Medical Systems Inc. said Wednesday that with the assistance of Dr. Avrami S. Grader and Dr. Philip M. Halleck from The Center for Quantitative Imaging at Penn State, it took images of 1998 baseballs.
"Examining the CT images of Mark McGwire's 70th home run ball one can clearly see the synthetic ring around the core -- or 'pill' -- of the baseball," UMS president David Zavagno said. "While Mark McGwire may or may not have used illegal steroids, the evidence shows his ball -- under the governing body of the league -- was juiced."
But Bob DuPuy, baseball's chief operating officer, said the core of the ball has been unchanged for decades. Rawlings has been the exclusive supplier of baseballs to the major leagues since 1977.
"All of our balls are subject to rigorous quality control standards and testing conducted by Rawlings," DuPuy said. "No changes have been made to the core of the ball through the entire time they have manufactured it."
UMS specifically examined the ball McGwire hit for No. 70 -- a record surpassed when Barry Bonds hit 73 homers in 2001. Zavagno said the company tested about 35 baseballs in all.
McGwire is on the Hall of Fame ballot for the first time this year, and results will be announced Tuesday by the Baseball Writers' Association of America.
"The synthetic rubber ring of the modern-day baseball, in this case that of Mark McGwire's prized 70th home run ball, acts as both a spring and a 'stop,'" Zavagno said. "Much like a sling shot pulled back 10 or 20 degrees farther than normal, the subsequent restitution or rebound allows an object to fly faster and farther."
Baseball spokesman Rich Levin said what UMS calls a rubber ring is more like a cardboard washer.
"We are satisfied that the ball comports with all major league specifications," DuPuy said. "Beginning in 2000, we have had annual independent testing done by UMass at Lowell, baseball research center, under the direction of Dr. James Sherwood, and those tests have showed full compliance with standards."
</H1>
 
May 5, 2002
2,661
1,090
113
#2
MLB officials know they turned their heads to EVERYONE usin previously un-banned substances, and prolly juiced balls cuz MLB was still tryn to bounce back from the strike and lagging ratings. Those MF's made money off the puppet-athletes now lettin em hang on the noose after they made their $$ and got the fans back in it
 
Oct 30, 2002
11,091
1,888
113
www.soundclick.com
#3
4fifteenRolla said:
MLB officials know they turned their heads to EVERYONE usin previously un-banned substances, and prolly juiced balls cuz MLB was still tryn to bounce back from the strike and lagging ratings. Those MF's made money off the puppet-athletes now lettin em hang on the noose after they made their $$ and got the fans back in it

yup..i feel u on that one
 
Sep 25, 2005
1,281
0
0
49
#4
why does a complany have to do IMAGING scans???

why dont they get balls from that year and the years right before and after 1998 and open them up and test them?
 

Quick

Active member
May 6, 2002
6,443
30
48
Yay Area, CA
#5
LA Dodgers said:
why does a complany have to do IMAGING scans???

why dont they get balls from that year and the years right before and after 1998 and open them up and test them?
Maybe they have computers that do the hard work and can actually see inside without going thru that trouble....... And why would they take a ball that broke a record and fuck it up just for a test?????
 
Sep 25, 2005
1,281
0
0
49
#9
Quick said:
Maybe they have computers that do the hard work and can actually see inside without going thru that trouble....... And why would they take a ball that broke a record and fuck it up just for a test?????
you obviously wont touch that ball but you can easily get other balls from that time frame.

and it isnt that hard to take a ball apart. i do it all the time when i get bored and have a ball that is too worn to keep using in practice.


some peope try and make it out to be rocket science to open up a baseball
 
Mar 16, 2005
6,904
401
83
#10
LA Dodgers said:
you obviously wont touch that ball but you can easily get other balls from that time frame.

and it isnt that hard to take a ball apart. i do it all the time when i get bored and have a ball that is too worn to keep using in practice.


some peope try and make it out to be rocket science to open up a baseball

it aint rocket science, just get benny the jet rodriguez to come over and smack it around it will split right open.
 
Sep 25, 2005
1,281
0
0
49
#13
strong evidence would be them opening up balls from that year and balls from this year and maybe also some from the early 90's and show us the difference.


dont get me wrong, i am not saying i dont believe the "results". i am just saying whats up with all the fancy "digital imaging" when all the have to do is cut the seams, take the 2 pieces of leather off and unroll the string until they get to the corked rubber center? takes about maybe 5 minutes? and gives every1 "Hard Evidence"