they werent found. iraq admitted to having them. now theyre saying they dont because they destroyed them.
SO YOU TAKE THE WORD OF IRAQ AS HAVING THEM.......YET YOU DONT TAKE THE WORDS OF IRAQ IN REGARDS TO THE WEAPONS BEING DESTROYED????? LMAO!!!!!! I KNOW IRAQ ADMITTED TO HAVING MISSILES. CAN YOU PLEASE SHOW ME IRAQ ADMITTING TO HAVING NUKES?
if you would read some biased news sometimes you would know. but you get the straight facts unlike us. you have the foreign press who wants nothing more than fairness and accurace in reporting especially when dealing with americans.
LIKE THE ASSOCIATED PRESS.
now back to the topic being discussed. nice way to get around answering it!!!!!
I TOLD HIM TO READ THAT LINK AND *AFTER* HE READ IT I WOULD GO A LIL BIT DEEPER. HE HAS YET TO REPLY SO I CANT GO ANY DEEPER WITH HIM. AFTER I MADE THE STATEMENT I DIRECTED MY ATTENTION TOWARDS YOU AND YOUR COMMENT ABOUT YOUR FINDINGS.
a lack of security footage at an airport DOES NOT MEAN OUR GOVT DESTROYED THE WTC.
DID YOUR EAD THE LINK? NOT ONLY DO YOU HAVE A LACK OF FOOTAGE BUT YOU HAVE THE BUSH BIN LADEN CONNECTION GOING ON. IN FACT TEH THREAD HAS ***LITTLE*** TO DO WITH LACK OF FOOTAGE.
NOW HERES A QUESTION TO PONDER.
IF USAMA BIN LADEN WERE TO GO ON TRIAL IN AN AMERICAN COURT OF LAW WHAT EVIDENCE HAS THE GOVERNMENT SHOWN TO THE PEOPLE? WHAT EVIDENCE COULD BE USED TO CONVICT HIM IN AN AMERICAN COURT OF LAW (ASSUMING THE COURT WAS UNBIASED).
ANOTHER ONE BITES THE DUST.
:dead:
:H: