Bush has entered the evolution/creationism debate
How do you suppose a creationist class would be taught?
“God created life!
Class dismissed!”
The problem with the intellectual pygmy’s statement is that one is a theory while the other is a Scientific Theory. There is a huge difference.
A scientific theory or law represents a hypothesis, or a group of related hypotheses, which has been confirmed through repeated experimental tests. Theories in physics are often formulated in terms of a few concepts and equations, which are identified with "laws of nature," suggesting their universal applicability. Accepted scientific theories and laws become part of our understanding of the universe and the basis for exploring less well-understood areas of knowledge. Theories are not easily discarded; new discoveries are first assumed to fit into the existing theoretical framework. It is only when, after repeated experimental tests, the new phenomenon cannot be accommodated that scientists seriously question the theory and attempt to modify it. The validity that we attach to scientific theories as representing realities of the physical world is to be contrasted with the facile invalidation implied by the expression, "It's only a theory." For example, it is unlikely that a person will step off a tall building on the assumption that they will not fall, because "Gravity is only a theory." source
Intelligent Design on the other hand cannot be tested, has absolutely no evidence, no supporting evidence…nothing.
Pfff. I suppose we should expose all religions to students while in school: Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Animism, Judaism, Taoism, Vodun, Wicca, Shinto, Sikhism, Jainism, Confucianism, Witchcraft, Satanism, Druidism, Paganism, Scientology, Universalism, Zoroastrianism, Lukumi, Macumba, Gnosticism, Mowayhhidoon, Deism, etc. "No time for Math or English, you must be exposed to beliefs that hold absolutely no weight! Today we are going to lean about Raelians!"
Thank you Kansas Board of Education for dumbing down Amerika.
How do you suppose a creationist class would be taught?
“God created life!
Class dismissed!”
President George W. Bush waded into the debate over evolution and "intelligent design" Monday, saying schools should teach both theories on the creation and complexity of life.
A scientific theory or law represents a hypothesis, or a group of related hypotheses, which has been confirmed through repeated experimental tests. Theories in physics are often formulated in terms of a few concepts and equations, which are identified with "laws of nature," suggesting their universal applicability. Accepted scientific theories and laws become part of our understanding of the universe and the basis for exploring less well-understood areas of knowledge. Theories are not easily discarded; new discoveries are first assumed to fit into the existing theoretical framework. It is only when, after repeated experimental tests, the new phenomenon cannot be accommodated that scientists seriously question the theory and attempt to modify it. The validity that we attach to scientific theories as representing realities of the physical world is to be contrasted with the facile invalidation implied by the expression, "It's only a theory." For example, it is unlikely that a person will step off a tall building on the assumption that they will not fall, because "Gravity is only a theory." source
Intelligent Design on the other hand cannot be tested, has absolutely no evidence, no supporting evidence…nothing.
Bush compared the current debate to earlier disputes over "creationism," a related view that adheres more closely to Biblical explanations. As Governor of Texas, Bush said students should be exposed to both creationism and evolution.
[…]
"I think that part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought," Bush said. "You're asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas. The answer is yes."
[…]
"I think that part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought," Bush said. "You're asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas. The answer is yes."
The Kansas Board of Education is considering changes to encourage the teaching of intelligent design in Kansas schools, and Christian conservatives are pushing for similar changes in other school districts across the country.
The National Academy of Sciences and the American Association for the Advancement of Science have both concluded that there is no scientific basis for intelligent design and oppose its inclusion in school science classes.
"The claim that equity demands balanced treatment of evolutionary theory and special creation in science classrooms reflects a misunderstanding of what science is and how it is conducted," the academy said in a 1999 assessment.
"Creationism, intelligent design and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science," the academy said.
"The claim that equity demands balanced treatment of evolutionary theory and special creation in science classrooms reflects a misunderstanding of what science is and how it is conducted," the academy said in a 1999 assessment.
"Creationism, intelligent design and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life or of species are not science because they are not testable by the methods of science," the academy said.