Bad News For Raider Fans

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
T

Tuaroa

Sicc OG
#1
Aug 26, 2002
855
0
0
#1
I know there is going to be a lot of hate here but i really dont care...speak your mind...it's bad enough that we got an ass whoopin in the superbowl...i'm still recovering...but what really pisses me off is the fact that...

CHARLES WOODSON IS ON THE TRADING BLOCK...HOW CAN THEY EVEN CONSIDER GETTING RID OF ONE OF OUR FRANCHISE DEFENSIVE PLAYERS.
 
gimpypimp

gimpypimp

Sicc OG
#2
May 2, 2002
3,895
163
0
#2
It's not often one of the premier cover corners in the NFL becomes trade material, but the Oakland Raiders are peddling Charles Woodson in hopes of getting a first-round pick in exchange, according to a league source.

Woodson, arguably the best corner in the league when healthy, is entering the final year of his current contract, which could have an impact on any decision the Raiders would make in trading him. Woodson is set to make $1.812 million in 2003. With a cap hit of $3.820 million, he's somewhat of a bargain. But if the Raiders trade him, he would save them $1.3 million against the cap.

Any team that would trade for him would also likely have to try and work out some kind of long-term deal with Woodson before making the deal, although it's not required. Woodson will almost certainly be seeking a deal that would make him the highest-paid cornerback in the league.

The 26-year-old Woodson played in just eight games, starting seven, after breaking his leg early last season. He did return to play in the playoffs and in the Super Bowl loss to the Bucs.

He had just one interception on the year, and has only two in the past two seasons. Despite the numbers, he is considered an outstanding man cover player, which makes him a valuable commodity.

The Raiders needed to trim nearly $45 million from their cap by Friday, and have trimmed some of it by restructuring the contracts of several players, including right tackle Lincoln Kennedy .

But they also will be forced to release several key veterans. Among those who will be released, according to a source, are cornerback Tory James, defensive end Regan Upshaw, defensive tackle Sam Adams and safety Anthony Dorsett.

If the Raiders trade Woodson, it would mean they would open the 2003 season with two different starting corners than the pair that started in the Super Bowl, since James is going to be released. Second-year player Phillip Buchanon is expected to be one starter as he returns from a broken wrist that forced him to miss much of last season.
 
T

Tuaroa

Sicc OG
#4
Aug 26, 2002
855
0
0
#4
Y the fuck did it take us so long to get rid of certain fucks...man finally Dorsett and Jett...also Upshaw, James, Kirby...but y Woodson...we'll see where they go from here...and Dallas is interested in Woodson...just a heads up.
 
gimpypimp

gimpypimp

Sicc OG
#6
May 2, 2002
3,895
163
0
#6
CBS...Here is the complete article.....


Raiders dangling C. Woodson for first-round pick
Feb. 27, 2003
By Pete Prisco
SportsLine.com Senior Writer
Tell Pete your opinion!


It's not often one of the premier cover corners in the NFL becomes trade material, but the Oakland Raiders are peddling Charles Woodson in hopes of getting a first-round pick in exchange, according to a league source.

Advertisement



Woodson, arguably the best corner in the league when healthy, is entering the final year of his current contract, which could have an impact on any decision the Raiders would make in trading him. Woodson is set to make $1.812 million in 2003. With a cap hit of $3.820 million, he's somewhat of a bargain. But if the Raiders trade him, he would save them $1.3 million against the cap.

Any team that would trade for him would also likely have to try and work out some kind of long-term deal with Woodson before making the deal, although it's not required. Woodson will almost certainly be seeking a deal that would make him the highest-paid cornerback in the league.

The 26-year-old Woodson played in just eight games, starting seven, after breaking his leg early last season. He did return to play in the playoffs and in the Super Bowl loss to the Bucs.

He had just one interception on the year, and has only two in the past two seasons. Despite the numbers, he is considered an outstanding man cover player, which makes him a valuable commodity.

The Raiders needed to trim nearly $45 million from their cap by Friday, and have trimmed some of it by restructuring the contracts of several players, including right tackle Lincoln Kennedy .

But they also will be forced to release several key veterans. Among those who will be released, according to a source, are cornerback Tory James, defensive end Regan Upshaw, defensive tackle Sam Adams and safety Anthony Dorsett.

If the Raiders trade Woodson, it would mean they would open the 2003 season with two different starting corners than the pair that started in the Super Bowl, since James is going to be released. Second-year player Phillip Buchanon is expected to be one starter as he returns from a broken wrist that forced him to miss much of last season.
 
N

Nitro GH

Sicc OG
#7
Apr 25, 2002
1,445
0
0
44
#7
gimpypimpy: In the future, it would be wise to put the source of whatever article you post. In your first reply I was thinking to myself how that was exceptionally good writing, and thinking maybe it was written by someone else. Dont take this personal, I dont care weather you do or not, but there are people that will have a feild day with your ass for trying to steal shit from another source weather it was your intention to do such an act or not. Nothing personal, your have been postin' good shit, im just lookin' out. Do you know what happened to LadyNutLoc?
 
T

T-Dubb

Sicc OG
#10
Apr 25, 2002
1,618
30
48
#10
that could be a good move for the raiders.......woodson is HELLA over rated, he been gettin beat quiet often the last few years........an thats only when some pussy ass injury aint keepin him on the sidelines
 
P

Playa510

Sicc OG
#12
May 10, 2002
1,392
0
0
43
#12
T-DUBB YOUR VERY ON POINT ON THIS ONE, I HAVENT SEEN WOODSEN REALLY PUT IT DOWN SINCE HIS FIRST SEASON, HE GETS INJURED SO MUCH NOW AND HIS COVERAGE ISNT EVEN THAT GREAT ANYMORE, EITHER OFFENSES HAVE FIGURED HIM OUT OR HE IS JUST FALLING OFF.

IM A RAIDERS FAN TO THE HEART, BUT THE RAIDERS COULD GET SOME MAJOR COMPENSATIONS FOR HIM!!!!
 
T

Tuaroa

Sicc OG
#13
Aug 26, 2002
855
0
0
#13
I agree with you playa510...we might as well get something for him now...he's not living up to his potential...i mean he was spose to be our franchise player...but he hasn't put it down...i mean the raiders wouldnt' make a move like this if they didnt have a back up plan...
 
B

BOSS925

Sicc OG
#14
May 9, 2002
680
0
0
42
#14
I THINK Y'ALL ARE TRIPPIN C.WOOD IS DOPE!! AND I BET HE DONT GO NOWHERE I ALSO READ THAT WE ARE GONNA SIGN RODNEY HARRISON!!OUR DB'S WILL BE OFF THE CHAIN IF THIS HAPPENS,WOODSON AND BUCHANON AT CB'S AND WOODSON AND HARRISON AT THE SAFTEY'S!!! C.WOODSON WONT BE TRADED MARK MY WORD!!

RAIDER NATION!!!!
 
T

T-Dubb

Sicc OG
#16
Apr 25, 2002
1,618
30
48
#16
I will be PISSED if Harrison goes to Oakland, he either needs to come to my team or get the fuck out the afc west.......cuz I HATE watchin my dudes get smashed on by him 2 times a year
 
Q

Quick

Active member
#18
May 6, 2002
6,443
30
48
Yay Area, CA
#18
i guess you raider fans wont be saying shit about next year as in the past 10 years....


but 2005 or 2006...........


just wait cuz the next year excuse wont be good anymore.



the raiders are going

down

down


down



down






down






downhill from here......




cuz this is only the begining.......
 
gimpypimp

gimpypimp

Sicc OG
#20
May 2, 2002
3,895
163
0
#20
gimpypimpy: In the future, it would be wise to put the source of whatever article you post. In your first reply I was thinking to myself how that was exceptionally good writing, and thinking maybe it was written by someone else. Dont take this personal, I dont care weather you do or not, but there are people that will have a feild day with your ass for trying to steal shit from another source weather it was your intention to do such an act or not. Nothing personal, your have been postin' good shit, im just lookin' out. Do you know what happened to LadyNutLoc?
Click to expand...
Nitro...

I don't take it personal...I normally do post the link or the complete article. The original place where I copied it didn't have the source so I had to find it.

And I am well aware of what happened to LadyNutLoc...I was the first person to call her out on copying that article.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom