Astrologers fail to predict proof they are wrong

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Feb 17, 2005
1,729
2
0
#21
hmm no worries. i am kinda inclined to believe you, because now that i think about it, im pretty sure i read that in some philosophy type book, which might not be the most reliable source on this kind of stuff.
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#22
It is true that astronomy and astrology were not differentiated until the scientific revolution of the 17th and 18h century, no need to argue over that. Moreover, I am taking a history of science class right now that focuses on the Middle Ages and the Renaissance and what really surprised me is that a lot of the stuff that actually drove science ahead came from magic, astrology and other occult disciplines, certainly not from any science-like activity done with the aims and in the form we are all familiar with

That does not make these practices any more scientific though, they were precursors (whether necessary or not is debatable) for the development of real science; once we have science though, their place must be clear - out of the lives of people
 
May 13, 2002
8,039
858
0
38
montyslaw.blogspot.com
#26
It is true that astronomy and astrology were not differentiated until the scientific revolution of the 17th and 18h century, no need to argue over that. Moreover, I am taking a history of science class right now that focuses on the Middle Ages and the Renaissance and what really surprised me is that a lot of the stuff that actually drove science ahead came from magic, astrology and other occult disciplines, certainly not from any science-like activity done with the aims and in the form we are all familiar with

That does not make these practices any more scientific though, they were precursors (whether necessary or not is debatable) for the development of real science; once we have science though, their place must be clear - out of the lives of people
Exactly the point I was trying to make. That shit got us to where we are today in science, and it's only until relatively recently that supernatural things have not been included in science.
 
Aug 1, 2004
392
0
0
#28
What cracks me up is every new generation of people think they have the answers to the mysteries of life and how the universe works.....LOL

No one really knows shit in the long run. Once you can admit to yourself that life is just an experiance, no matter how signifcant or insignificant, it becomes alot easier to have an open mind and just except that human beings are not the all knowing center of the universe.

Alot of scientists and doctors seem like their sense of curiosity that may have sparked thier passion for understanding has givin way to thier "I'm all knowing" ego. Kind of like some of the people on this board.

"The more you learn, the less you know" - great words to live by.
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#29
What cracks me up is every new generation of people think they have the answers to the mysteries of life and how the universe works.....LOL

No one really knows shit in the long run. Once you can admit to yourself that life is just an experiance, no matter how signifcant or insignificant, it becomes alot easier to have an open mind and just except that human beings are not the all knowing center of the universe.

Alot of scientists and doctors seem like their sense of curiosity that may have sparked thier passion for understanding has givin way to thier "I'm all knowing" ego. Kind of like some of the people on this board.

"The more you learn, the less you know" - great words to live by.
I can just as well say that the people who are not scientists use that sort attack against the authority of scientists and doctors (you think you know it all but in reality you don't know shit) to excuse their own ignorance...

A lot has been written on anti-intellectualism and its roots, I suggest that you go and read some of it

The more you learn, the more you know how much you don't know, this is much more true than what you said, you will often hear Nobel laureates say that they don't know (and that nobody knows) something and this pretty much invalidates your claim
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#30
Exactly the point I was trying to make. That shit got us to where we are today in science, and it's only until relatively recently that supernatural things have not been included in science.
No, supernatural things have never been included in science. When they were included in intellectual activity, it was not science. Only after they got removed from it, it became science (although it was called science before that too) :)
 
May 13, 2002
8,039
858
0
38
montyslaw.blogspot.com
#31
No, supernatural things have never been included in science. When they were included in intellectual activity, it was not science. Only after they got removed from it, it became science (although it was called science before that too) :)
Right, intellectual activity is more accurate. The point still stands that they were integrated for a long time and the split is fairly recent in terms of human existence...
 
Feb 17, 2005
1,729
2
0
#32
so the ancients like mayans, etc. actually had similar BS astrology stuff like people today in relating when you were born to who you would get along with and stuff like that? or was it more mystical weird shamanism stuff?
 
Mar 4, 2007
2,678
5
0
#34
so the ancients like mayans, etc. actually had similar BS astrology stuff like people today in relating when you were born to who you would get along with and stuff like that? or was it more mystical weird shamanism stuff?
lol.

please inform yourself before you attack a whole cultures scientific findings.
thanks.

Ok. so lamberto is just schooling you in a very nice way, but i'm tired of people bullshitting and calling stuff "fake" and "bullshitted" just because they are unable to understand the complexity of it.

Go take some college courses in anthropology and astrology, and maybe you could talk some shit on Mayans and their "BS" lol.

i'm just asking for some respect for some amazing mathematicians and their entire culture which was sadly demolished by ignorant people(aka spanish)
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#35
What is so rediculous about curious people observing the world and trying to explain it the best they could? Whether you agree with it or not, this shit played a huge roll in the evolution of science.
The belief that some mystical man, that appearntly no one has ever seen, created life is ridiculous...but thats just me.

*shrugs*
 
May 13, 2002
8,039
858
0
38
montyslaw.blogspot.com
#36
The belief that some mystical man, that appearntly no one has ever seen, created life is ridiculous...but thats just me.

*shrugs*
Believing in a God may be ridiculous to you and that's fine. But saying that astrology is ridiculous would be to insult a huge and fundamental part of the formation of science. The idea of Gods branched off of studying the stars and sky, but that was only one aspect of astrology, you can't ignore the rest. Or better said, you shouldn't...
 
Aug 1, 2004
392
0
0
#37
I can just as well say that the people who are not scientists use that sort attack against the authority of scientists and doctors (you think you know it all but in reality you don't know shit) to excuse their own ignorance...

A lot has been written on anti-intellectualism and its roots, I suggest that you go and read some of it

The more you learn, the more you know how much you don't know, this is much more true than what you said, you will often hear Nobel laureates say that they don't know (and that nobody knows) something and this pretty much invalidates your claim
I stated an opinion based on personal observation....not a claim, which is why I said "...alot seem like"

Both quotes mean virtually the same thing.

All doctors and scientists don't get a pass....some are ignorant and egotistical just like other people.
 
Feb 17, 2005
1,729
2
0
#38
lol.

please inform yourself before you attack a whole cultures scientific findings.
thanks.

Ok. so lamberto is just schooling you in a very nice way, but i'm tired of people bullshitting and calling stuff "fake" and "bullshitted" just because they are unable to understand the complexity of it.

Go take some college courses in anthropology and astrology, and maybe you could talk some shit on Mayans and their "BS" lol.

i'm just asking for some respect for some amazing mathematicians and their entire culture which was sadly demolished by ignorant people(aka spanish)
i was ASKING. because obviously i dont know much about this. what little i read in a non-anthropology book seems to have been wrong, so im asking the peeps who apparently do know stuff about this for info.

ok so since it apparently wasnt clear i was asking a question...

did the mayans use their astrological/astronomical studies for the same type of BS that people use astrology for today? as in relationships and if you are born under a certain sign you wont get along with people born under signs x,y, and z? or was it completely different?
 
Mar 4, 2007
2,678
5
0
#39
i was ASKING. because obviously i dont know much about this. what little i read in a non-anthropology book seems to have been wrong, so im asking the peeps who apparently do know stuff about this for info.

ok so since it apparently wasnt clear i was asking a question...

did the mayans use their astrological/astronomical studies for the same type of BS that people use astrology for today? as in relationships and if you are born under a certain sign you wont get along with people born under signs x,y, and z? or was it completely different?

your previous posts were very rude, and you sayin "same type of bs" how is it bs? lol.


i have used astrology, NOT THE SHIT IN MAGAZINES or the Daily newspaper, but REAL, descriptive astrology in order to help guide myself in many romantic relationships. Its easy to get wrapped up in certain characteristics of one's personality, but astrology gives a holisitic (wholistic) view, and really the 'annoying' things that i would experience just happened to be part of who that person was, and it was never going to change, so luckily i was able to end it before i wasted all my time, and keep a lot of them as friends that way as well.

I can explain a little how Mayans used astrology/astronomy as a guideline for their life. They believed that everything was a pattern, and this pattern was interpreted from the world around us, especially the skies. They knew that life was a cycle, birth/death/etc. and that being created is just as important as being 'destroyed' as we call it. That helps explain the 2012 apocalyptic prediction. Unfortunately, we are unable to understand what they used their calendars for and to what length, because like i said, the Aztec would ruin many of their temples and artifacts along with the Spanish invasion completely tearing apart Mayan and Aztec culture.

But i am pretty sure they were more focused on greater aspects of the calendar than just the chemistry two people would have together, it helped predict their next farming season, and other aspects of daily, weekly, and yearly life. I know that i'm not fully informed, like many Mayan specialists but that is the sliver that i know of Mayan culture so far.

I don't know what book you were reading, but seriously you should look up some other kinds of books that are written by anthropologists.

If you go to college, then look up anthropology links through your special access to the public library or college library
 

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#40
your previous posts were very rude, and you sayin "same type of bs" how is it bs? lol.


i have used astrology, NOT THE SHIT IN MAGAZINES or the Daily newspaper, but REAL, descriptive astrology in order to help guide myself in many romantic relationships. Its easy to get wrapped up in certain characteristics of one's personality, but astrology gives a holisitic (wholistic) view, and really the 'annoying' things that i would experience just happened to be part of who that person was, and it was never going to change, so luckily i was able to end it before i wasted all my time, and keep a lot of them as friends that way as well.
uuhhmm, that's exactly the BS in the magazines:confused: