Artists Pay to Perform??? Your thoughts ??

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Oct 30, 2002
11,091
1,888
113
www.soundclick.com
#1
I think its bogus.. Some see it as the only way to get on.. I think if artist stop paying they'll stop charging... Take it back to were you want talented people to do shows not the highest bidder.....
 
Dec 2, 2006
6,161
44
0
#2
It is business. Talent is the least important aspect of the music industry, that much is evident.

I say do what you got to do, if that means paying to get put on, pay. Money makes the world go around.
 
May 24, 2002
4,715
2,627
113
www.sovereign-records.com
#3
grease them palms.. i wish it was based on talent but the fact is its not.. i'll pay to get on anything good.. most of the time i got ways to make my money back ya feel..

i aint trippin .. the game is what it is and ive embraced it .. time to make it happen...
 
Oct 30, 2002
11,091
1,888
113
www.soundclick.com
#4
If the artist stopped paying would the practice of paying to get on stop? I cna see the point of view of paying for it as advertisement.

But when did this become nessesary?

Is it the promotores fault for not promoting properly and getting the funds secured pre- tix sales sponsers etc...?

are they being lazy????

Is it the Outta town headline artist demanding too much????

Is it rap music is the only genre of music that does this???

My lil bro is wrapping up a tour of Cali to AZ and his band is getting breaded for every show. Granted he is in a rock band.. Never had i heard or seen my bro's band have to play to perform ever.They always got $$ for every show.

Why is rap different

edit:I respect everyones reasons/incite.. just wanna get a topic going about the business side...and see where things changed and why...
 
Dec 2, 2006
6,161
44
0
#5
Rap is different because of the liability involved. The measure of an artist, atleast in the Bay Area in my opinion, is how real the artist is off the mic. Anytime an opportunity presents itself in a public setting to prove one's realness, you see an action. What you see now is a reaction to all the actions over the years.
 
Oct 30, 2002
11,091
1,888
113
www.soundclick.com
#9
And if everyone says don't do it, I would do it based on that alone. As long as there is a decent crowd you can't lost if you are on your hustle.
unless your product is not worth $$ after the fact

edit: i mean u can buy up all the superbowl commercials for 3 billion $ next year and advertise "SHIT SANDWICHES" What REAL MEN EAT! sure like outta the millions upon millions of viewers a few thousand will buy and eat it.. but remember you sell shit sandwiches. U aint gonna last vs wendys/mcdonalds etc...
 
Dec 2, 2006
6,161
44
0
#10
unless your product is not worth $$ after the fact
If that isthe case, you shouldn't be doing it to begin with. Artists don't spend enough time selling themselves. If I am at a show with a 100 people, 10 people will buy a CD off of me. It is a numbers game ultimately. Sitting at the bar looking like a baller or selling yourself, what is better from an artist stand point? I use this example because I see it all the time. Fuck, I would walk around with some sound scan equipment to scan every sale if that is what it took.
 
Sep 18, 2008
322
34
0
49
#11
I made a lot of money charging people to get on shows. People need expo$ure you gonna pay for it sooner or later . I'd rather pay to get on a tour then spend money to get on a website or magazine.
 
Dec 28, 2009
883
199
0
44
#12
i know a couple of promoters that charge people to open up for the headliners and i know a few artists who have and/or will pay for an opportunity to open up for a headliner. i was recently propositioned to pay to get on a "mixtape tour" and i told em "You should be paying me". i feel like if you pay for shows you look like a sucka. id rather go hit all the open mics throughout the weekdays. theres opportunitys to get shows out there you just got to find them and meet the right people.