although i dont (didnt) support the war

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
XianeX

XianeX

Sicc OG
#1
May 17, 2002
1,016
6
38
46
www.xianex.com
#1
my opinion is changing. 3 points

1. france, belgium, russia, etc. . . are pissing me off because they are being visciously against it. not because of the interest of the world but for the interest of their poccets and their skillful hiding of what part they may be playin to support Iraqs disdain for the US. (although i think they ARE unwittingly doing a service to the world keeping america from becoming the empire of the world. which quite possibly may end up with the dissolution of nato)

2. The economy SUCCS ASS! its hard as fucc for me to find a job in the IT shit. hence im starting school again next month. call it selfish but goddammit im more concerned about my well being and pleasure than the lives of those that remotely effect mine. Bush is not going to help the economy improve unless he gets his war. the longer that they make him procrastinate the more devastating it will be to the economy and to every US citizen who seeks a job (outside of the service industry).

3. Bush WILL have his war. at the expense of the nation if necessary. he WILL kill sadaam. he will have his fathers revenge. he's doing his best to sacrifice his second term in office to kill sadaam. with that determination and power. i want him to get it over with as soon as possible so that we can get bacc to the business of america. think about it. other than this iraq shit he doesnt have any significant ideas to help america. his sole purpose was to elliminate saddaam after that i bet you he would pleasantly give up office. his job as president would be fulfilled.
 
P

playateepimpski

Fresh
#2
Jul 21, 2002
14
0
0
39
#2
If we go to war with iraq we will win the battle but we may not win the war. How many of you honestly think this war is about " weapons of mass destruction" ? Or how many even think that it is soley about oil? It is about world domination, period end. Ill paraphase so as you to understand, we buy oil from sodom, sodom likes to make cash from that so he jacks up the price, "america" (oil companys) get(s) pissed cuz they dont want to pay, so all of the sudden they are terrorists. bush is a puppet, that is my conclusion.
oh yeah I have a question, why arent we doing something about korea if they have nukes n shit, isnt that a weapon of mass destruction ?
 
Blight

Blight

Sicc OG
#3
May 12, 2002
3,583
101
0
GoProGraphics.com
#3
POINTS 1-3
1. I cant argue with that.
2. I think the dollar will shoot up a bit but many economists are calling it temporary. They dont think it will last long.
3. Then Bush is an Idiot who will successfully be in History Books for years to come. As long as it leaves a world behind when the war is over. Afterall if your in charge of the best army in the world, they need work to do to. But i dont think they should.

@Playa... we should go after them as soon as Iraq is done according to logic.
 
HERESY

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
#4
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#4
IN REGARDS TO POINT #1: RUSSIA AND FRANCE WILL REAP ***GREAT PROFITS AND OIL CONTRACTS*** IF NO WAR HAPPENS.


IN REGARDS TO POINT #2: YES THE ECONOMY DOES SUCK ASS,IF YOU CAN GET BACK IN SCHOOL DO SO,YES WAR STIMULATES AN ECONOMY.......SO DOES "FEAR"....PEEP THE Y2K SITUATION.


IN REGARDS TO POINT #3: NO HE DOESNT HAVE ANY IDEAS THAT WILL BENEFIT YOU,MYSELF OR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. HE DOES HOWEVER HAVE PLANS THAT WILL BENEFIT THE RICH AND GLOBAL ELITE. SO IF HE KILLS SADDAM,PLACES A "PUPPET" IN POWER (LIKE THEY DID IN THE AFGHANS). THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT (NOT THE PEOPLE) WILL BE ABLE TO LIVE OFF THE OIL FOR MANY YEARS......

@PLAYA I AGREE WITH YOU ABOUT THE KOREA SITUATION. KOREA IS ALSO A ***HUGE*** METH DEALER. SO NOW YOU HAVE WAR ON TERRORISM AND DRUGS (LOL!!)

@BLIGHT DO YOU KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT GEN.PATTON AND HIS VIEWS ON RUSSIA???




:h:
 
C

Cameron

Sicc OG
#5
Aug 6, 2002
1,637
3
0
42
#5
The economy SUCCS ASS! its hard as fucc for me to find a job in the IT shit.
Click to expand...
yes it is, techs are a dime a dozen right now. There flooding the market because of so many down sizes and layoffs. you should think about getting into another field, or like you said go back to school and get a higher degree so you might stand out a little.
 
P

phil

Sicc OG
#6
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
115
#6
france, belgium, russia, etc. . . are pissing me off because they are being visciously against it. not because of the interest of the world but for the interest of their poccets and their skillful hiding of what part they may be playin to support Iraqs disdain for the US.
Click to expand...
you forgot to mention democrats along with those 3 countries.
 
XianeX

XianeX

Sicc OG
#8
May 17, 2002
1,016
6
38
46
www.xianex.com
#8
definitely it IS about money and power. but im a selfish person with an open mind and a closed heart. i completely understand russia, france, and germany's perspectives. they want to be the light bringers just like america remains as such. but heres my problem:

the damage that bush is doing to the economy is LONG lasting. this one person has taken a balanced budget and turned it into an $x-billion defict in less than 10 months being in office. he has done little to improve it. but guess what this was predicted by al gore.

i dont know how many of you even watched the presidential debates but it was plain as day to me then that bush counted the chiccens before they were hatched. all the while gore was asking him how can you spend 1.3 trillion in 2 directions at once. people were complaining about how arrogant he was. while gore was talking about economical common sense bush was concerned about defence spending and killing the surplus.

i personally hope EVERY IDIOT THAT VOTED FOR BUSH IS GETTIN WHAT THEY DESERVE! absolutely NOTHING!!!

@ pitty - you know! thats why im enrolled and am ready to start next month. i dont want to change fields of study because i enjoy what i do. but ive been plannin in a 5 year gait. hopefully a democrat will regain the reigns and i can find decent employment which pays me my worth. :)

@ blight - i doubt the dollar can do much more than reverberate its present state at least for the next 3 years. it would take a great giant technological advance in america to bring us out of the economic slump.

@ playa - politicians have been hoes for centuries. when you represent the populus you have to succ ass. keep in mind polite is the root of politician. guess thats what jesus meant by "the meek shall inherit the earth" *wink*

@ heresy - korea is not joking but bush is so wrapped up in his "quest of vengence" that hed be spreading himself too thin to fucc with korea. he NEVER even considered korea in his quest for presidency. such is the action of tunnel minded people. they never plan for contingencies. korea will build the nuke but they will be neutralized before they can deploy it. this is a garauntee. america will tolerate bush to allow korea to wace its dicc around. but if korea acts like they are gonna sticc it in americas ass bush will either change course or be "kennedyized"
 
HERESY

HERESY

THE HIDDEN HAND...
#9
Apr 25, 2002
18,326
11,459
113
www.godscalamity.com
www.godscalamity.com
#9
^^^^ when you say "kennedyized" are you talking about him getting his head blown off in front of millions of people? if so i agree with you.

in regards to him spreading himself too thin you have to look at some things that will most likely occur if some of this goes down.

1.if america attacks iraq that puts more american troops in the mid east.

2.if america attacks iraq more tensions will arise in the mid east that will contribute to ISRAEL being attacked OR attacking another nation. if this happens expect more troops to hit the mid east.

3.china decides to take taiwan. will america send troops or weapons to help taiwan and protect its interest in the land? or will america sit back and watch?

4.north korea decides to attack south korea. once again will america send arms and troops to protect its interest or will it sit back and watch? if this happens what will CHINA do?

in regards to the economy and the debt and all that. well i was on a flight from arizona to the bay area a couple of months back. i spoke with a banker and we had an interesting convo. most of it had to do with economics and the government. he used the term "blind numbers". i will explain this later. i have to go.

:H:
 
XCHANGO4

XCHANGO4

Sicc OG
#12
May 5, 2002
1,034
0
0
42
#12
i posted this in bart forum

why are we over in the desert in the first place to stop armed aggression in kuwait which is our source for oil. we are there regulating everything that happens basically saddam surrendered and signed a treaty with a long lists of restrictions. the whole point of powell giving his speech was to show the way saddam and his regime violated many of the restrictions and obligations set upon him. if we let him violate this agreement then what the fuck are we there for that talking the talk and not walking. on GP we should go to war. why do we need to ask for approval from these other countries to show that there is still cooperation but if there is no enforcment of treaties then every coutry in the world will walk all over us.
that then turns to korea which we have been in war with for many years because that war never officially ended only thing separating them from war is the dmz they have nuclear capabilities so start up of a nuke reactor should be considered and act of war.

in both cases sacrifice of lives now save multiple lives in the future from the use of weapons of mass destruction.
 
XianeX

XianeX

Sicc OG
#15
May 17, 2002
1,016
6
38
46
www.xianex.com
#15
@ :h: @ kennedyized that was exactly what i meant

im very interested to know about the "blind numbers".

@ MC - bush has exceeded my expectations as well in many respects. for a brief momment he had even earned my respect (i still waver in this regard). but take in to consideration this: how high was your original expectation? mine wasnt that high.

i knew when he first debated his fiscal policy that he was an idiot. and i knew that after 911 he would use that as a platform to launch his pre-election wish to disseminate iraq in into the history books.

now i realize that the war was "preempted" to fund his fiscal policy. think about it. if we dont win this war the american economy will be in more critical shambles. has anybody been watching the trade of the Dollar against the Euro???

no war no money no america. in comparison to many other forms of gov't i think i'll take my chances with this american living first
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom