WiCkEd said:
YEAH THE LAKERS AINT A VERY GOOD TEAM WITHOUT THE DIESEL BUT THAT WAS NEVER A BIG SECRET...THE LAKERS CONSIST OF TWO REALLY GOOD PLAYERS THAT BIENG KOBE AND SHAQ AND A BUNCH OF ROLE PLAYERS..ONE OF THE 2 GOES DOWN...THE LAKERS ARE VERY BEATABLE
Thats some real ass talk right there. Ive been saying that for ever, but these haters dont have much more to talk about then what everyone already knows. They are a two man team, they are the payroll, one goes down thats it. If they lost SHAQ for good, they would use that money to replace atleast 2 of the other 4 starters, being back in contention. Take McGrady or Iversonfor example. The reason why you can take a good player off of there team, and they will still do good, is because they are an evened out team with one superstar. Take The Magic and start over; You buy McGrady, spend the majority of what you have left and buy a superstar, then fill the rest with role players. McGrady and the other become dependant on each other. You guys would be idiots not to understand that. The risk factor is BIG as you can see, but the payout of it working successfully is apparant (Three Titles).
Houston dropped 53, DAMN! He tore us the hell up. Was Kobe guarding him? He got took if he was, fuck. Looked like Houston was trying to show him up. I read that shit about SHAQ earlier today and I knew this was bound to happen, I hope we get him back as soon as we can, we need his presence! I dont know why you posted Kobe's FG ratio as if it were bad... 14-31 = 45% = Good!