ALCS > Angels vs Yankees

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

who wins

  • angels in 4

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • angels in 5

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • angels in 6

    Votes: 6 22.2%
  • angels in 7

    Votes: 7 25.9%
  • yankees in 4

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • yankees in 5

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • yankees in 6

    Votes: 7 25.9%
  • yankees in 7

    Votes: 2 7.4%

  • Total voters
    27
Feb 14, 2009
3,196
12
0
46
#5
The Angels always play the Yanks tough. With A Rod playing red hot, I think the Bronx Bombers can pull it off. Don't for get bout Mr. October #2 Derek Jeter. I hope t's a good series tho.
 

P.E.

Sicc OG
Feb 24, 2003
1,977
514
113
#6
ANGELS PITCHING ROTATION IS > YANKEES PITCHING ROTATION!....AND AS FAR AS JETER AND A-ROID AND MAYBE TEXIERIA ARE CONCERNED,.THERE AINT TO MUCH OF A THREAT TO BE WORRIED ALL SERIES,..IF WE HOLD JETER AND A-ROID OFF,..THE ANGELS WILL CRUISE THRU THIS SERIES!...AND I HAVE EVEN BIGGER DOUGHTS THAT THE ANGELS WILL LOSE IN A WORLD SERIES AGAINST DA PHILLIES OR DODGERS!....ANGELS ARE IN A GOOD POSITION RIGHT NOW,AND WE'RE JUST PLAYING REAL GRITTY BALL RIGHT NOW AND HAVE MAJOR MOMENTUM COMING OFF THAT BOSTON WIN!..AND ON TOP OF ALL THAT U ADD THE NICK ADENHART THING TO THE MIX AND YEA,..ANGELS ARE ON A STREAK AND PLAYING IN A CERTAIN STATE OF MIND!..DONT BE SURPRISED IF U SEE THEM TAKE GAME ONE OR 2,MAYBE BOTH IN NEW YORK!

ANGELS IN 6!
 

P.E.

Sicc OG
Feb 24, 2003
1,977
514
113
#9
you edited your post and i still didn't get anything you fucking posted^
WELL NO OFFENSE,BUT EITHER U DONT REALLY KNOW HOW TO READ,OR YOUR JUST A FUCKING IDIOT!....EITHER WAY,...


OK HERE WE GO,...."ANGELS IN 6!"...IS THAT PLAIN ENOUGH FOR UR SLOW DUMB ASS?!...JUST SAYIN THO
 

P.E.

Sicc OG
Feb 24, 2003
1,977
514
113
#12
LOOKS LIKE VEGAS IS GOING WHERE THE MONEY IS!...THE EXPENSIVE TEAM,..BUT U CANT PAY FOR EXPENSIVE PLAYERS AND EXPECT TO WIN IT ALL,...ANGELS ARE MORE SKILLED AND MORE VERSATILE...THEY HAVE "DEPTH!"...THATS WHERE ITS GONNA PAY OFF,..YEA YANKEES ARE CAPABLE AND DANGEROUS,BUT ITS ABOUT PITCHING AND ANGELS HAVE THE EDGE IN THAT DEPARTMENT!...CC,BURNETT,CHABA,PETTITE?!...NAW,THAT WONT STOP THIS ANGEL LINE-UP!...THAT AINT GOT NOTHING ON LACKEY,WEAVER,KAZMIR,SAUNDERS, PLUS WE GOT SOME NICE LOOKING ARMS FOR THE BULLPIN NOW THAT NO ONE HAS EVEN HEARD ABOUT YET,BUT THEY WILL,..THROWING 97 98+!!..THE PIN LOOKS LIKE OLIVER,SANTANA,FUENTES,PALMER,BULGER AND JEPSEN ALL STRAIGHT HEAT!.....ANGELS IN 6!
 

prodigy91

@jordvnxsf
Mar 20, 2008
8,955
513
0
33
SF
#13
OH,...YEA OKAY,...SORY!...MY BAD 4 DOUGHTING U,...EXCUSE MY GRITTY GRAMMAR!,......................................................................................
 
May 6, 2002
7,218
2,906
113
#14
CC looked good against the Twins but I think he will get rocked by the Angels.

AJ is too much, I think they take that game. Talking about someone who was barely under the shadow of Roy Halladay his whole career. The guy is sick.

Pettitte is hard to call. Rollercoaster. When he's on point he is unhittbale, but when he stinks he gets wrecked.

It's going to be a great series but I really think we have much better than a 2-1 underdog chance in this one. I give them the edge due to home field and power, but they lack the chemistry and I think we should be able to beat them.

You never know about the umps though. I just hope they call it even for both teams.
 
Mar 10, 2007
2,603
57
0
37
#15
I think Yankees will win this in 6. They're playing good baseball right now and just took out one of the hottest teams in baseball pretty easy..

Yea Angels swept the Red Sox, but they weren't lookin too good..

Should be a good series though.
 

caff

Sicc OG
May 10, 2002
17,965
259
83
48
#16
Yankees wont get past the Angels. Only reason they got past the Twins is because the Twins were running on fumes. The Angels match up with the Yankees very well and Angles have a much better pitching staff than the Twins did. Only a matter of time before A-Fraud resorts to being his typical self int he playoffs. Angels in 7.