Ahmad Chalabi vs. Charlie Rose last night

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
69
#7
His take was: WMDs were destroyed or are in Syria.

He sidestepped the Iran question and disavowed links; he even went so far as to dismiss the large iranian presence in the country as nonexistant.
 
Apr 25, 2002
15,044
157
0
#8
I guess years of practice and bein buddies with dick, rice and rummy helps


sometimes i wonder why even do any interview if you know it's just going to be lies to your questions or if you plan on never calling someone out as a liar or trying to catch them in one.
 
Dec 25, 2003
12,356
218
0
69
#9
Charlie is good at that. What he (and most skilled interviewers) attempts to do is connect all the dots to the point where lies and inconsistancies become apparent. Though there is a certain constant ducking and dodging by all men in power, at least CR frames the questions such that they must be answered, as opposed to a cowed press corps or mechanical press release.