6's and 7's is 23 tracks.
- Thread starter kansascitycat
- Start date
- Status
Yeah I could, but I am about as perfect of a contributor to this forum as you are at being a mod. My bad.
Look man I was just trying to contribute, sorry I didn't throw this or anything else that I wanted to create a new thread for in the existing thread. Delete or merge or whatever the hell will make you feel better.
Look man I was just trying to contribute, sorry I didn't throw this or anything else that I wanted to create a new thread for in the existing thread. Delete or merge or whatever the hell will make you feel better.
Here's a novel idea...
Learn the meaning of the word "definitive", then all of your problems, well, they disappear!
Learn the meaning of the word "definitive", then all of your problems, well, they disappear!
Some of the shit that you allow to be posted in here doesn't belong but you take the time to give me shit when I am simply just posting threads that I thought would make for good forum discussion. Really if everyone was forced to abide by the rules of the forum and put everything where it belongs, there wouldn't be very many new threads in here at all. Most everything relates to the release of the upcoming album in regards to Tech N9ne news.
You have to remember that some of those features are (likely) just hooks and such, like we normally have Krizz on every Track for. If an artist has three verses on a track, but then has someone else do the hook (be it someone known like Cee-Lo Green or someone 'unknown' like Tonesha Sanders), I would still consider that a "solo." So like the Deftones, Cee-Lo and Stokley/Mint Condition being on some of the songs doesn't mean they're not "solos"
i always thought of the definitive thread as a round-up of sorts, where all the info that dpes get posted around gets edited into the single post so people DONT have to sort through 37pages and topics to find new news. so why then would new info keep getting tacked on the end of that thread? makes more sense to me to have individual discussions and threads about certain topics, then the pertaining info get edited into the main post in that thread
maybe its just me though...
maybe its just me though...
L, we get that the Definitive Thread DOES have all the info, what i was getting at was that you and others 'in charge' complain about new posts being made, and keeping the forum active, and tell them to put it in the Definitive thread, and not make new posts.
Wouldnt it make more sense to lock that vital thread, edit the post as needed and allow actual conversations to take place on a message board?
Wouldnt it make more sense to lock that vital thread, edit the post as needed and allow actual conversations to take place on a message board?
Nobody gives one good fuck about the others opinion until it becomes so stark a contrast to their own that they must seek retribution, so your point kind of falls flat.
What seems to usually happen is new info is posted in the correct thread, then the thread is updated by whomever started the post, in this case Kain, and he's a phenom at keeping up with new info so you scallywags don't get grumpy pants when searching for your desired info at the tail end of a thread.
The point could also be argued that nobody views that initial first post for new info, and actually seeks out info toward the end of said thread because chronologically they process info better.
See how subjective everything is? It's a miracle of science, I tell you!
What seems to usually happen is new info is posted in the correct thread, then the thread is updated by whomever started the post, in this case Kain, and he's a phenom at keeping up with new info so you scallywags don't get grumpy pants when searching for your desired info at the tail end of a thread.
The point could also be argued that nobody views that initial first post for new info, and actually seeks out info toward the end of said thread because chronologically they process info better.
See how subjective everything is? It's a miracle of science, I tell you!
- Status