49ers Vs. Falcons

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Who will win


  • Total voters
    78
  • Poll closed .
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
That's a fairly good comparison. But Johnson's been doing better then Fitz. Johnson is going to do good at that game, though. Matt Schaub is on fire, and his weapons that he has, has more total yards then the Cards', and 9ers.
All I'm saying is you don't know what's gonna happen. Everyone says Fitzgerald will "go off" on us EVERY SINGLE TIME WE PLAY ARIZONA. It hasn't happened since we got Nate Clements. He's been held in check every time we've played him. In the last game he got to pad his stats late in the 4th quarter when we were playing a prevent defense and let him free underneath, but he otherwise did nothing all game. Obviously Andre Johnson could very well pull a Roddy White on us, but for you to sit there and act like you can see the future is about as credible as Ms. Cleo.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
By the way savage, if I thought the Seahawks would beat the Cowboys, I'd definitely roll with Seattle. Dallas is really the only team I don't like in the entire league. SF and Dallas are real rivals. We've established a rivalry in meaningful games, like the NFC Championship - on numerous occasions, and we are both dynasties with rich histories. It seems like you think Seattle and SF are rivals - we are not. Your team has only been in the division for less than a decade and in that time there has only been one good/decent team in the division every year. You guys are just another team. I don't see why you're going all Jaworski on us all the time. LOL.
 

Meta4iCAL

Raider Nation
Feb 21, 2005
19,635
4,278
113
37
Dallas is really the only team I don't like in the entire league. SF and Dallas are real rivals.
I was talkin to some guy in one of my classes about football for a minute, and he told me his teams were the cowboys and the niners...

I was like wtf? you must not have been a football fan for a long time

it's true... one of my close boys is a niners fan, he doesn't give a fuck about any other NFC West teams, he was actually rooting for AZ in the super bowl, but he fuckin hates the cowboys with a passion
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
he was actually rooting for AZ in the super bowl
So was I, but I knew Pittsburgh would win. The Rams were the closest thing to a rivalry for us in the first few years of the 2000s, but that didn't last long enough for it to stick. The Seahawks haven't been around long enough and the Cardinals have never been any good.

Just because those teams are in our division doesn't make them rivals, it only means we have to play them twice a year and we need to end the season with a better record than them or a better record than the rest of the NFC teams that didn't finish 1st in their division. Other than that, the Rams, Seahawks and Cardinals mean nothing to me.

I just find it amusing that savage quietly hates on the Niners all the time as if we had some sort of history with his team. By "quietly" I mean he doesn't come right out and start hating, he just goes against the Niners whenever possible and gives them no credit or as little credit as possible. 'Ole Savage Jaworski, that's what I'ma call him from now on. LOL.
 
Mar 1, 2006
4,276
1,154
0
39
www.sendearnings.com
I was talkin to some guy in one of my classes about football for a minute, and he told me his teams were the cowboys and the niners...

I was like wtf? you must not have been a football fan for a long time

it's true... one of my close boys is a niners fan, he doesn't give a fuck about any other NFC West teams, he was actually rooting for AZ in the super bowl, but he fuckin hates the cowboys with a passion
FACT Every fake Football fan is a Cowboys fan, specially the ones that don't live in Texas.

Americas Bandwagon Team


Niners and Cowboys are the biggest rivals and Green Bay comes in second history wise.
 
Feb 14, 2004
16,667
4,746
113
41
No shit. I think dude has picked the Niners to win once, when he had no choice because we played the Rams. Just like Jaworski. What a surprise.
I don't see why it matters if I pick the 9ers to win every game or not. They are not my team. And I have chose them over the Cards and Rams. I chose my team over them, because well that's my team and I ain't going to chose against my team unless the other team is damn good, which is why I chose the Colts over us.
 
Feb 14, 2004
16,667
4,746
113
41
By the way savage, if I thought the Seahawks would beat the Cowboys, I'd definitely roll with Seattle.
The Cowboys have won only against losing teams, and lost to winning teams.

And I ain't going all Jaworski on no one. Here is what my picks were August 14th on my Seahawks forum, if you want the link, I can provide it:

Sun 9/13 St. Louis - WIN
Sun 9/20 at San Francisco - LOSE (toss up)
Sun 9/27 Chicago - WIN
Sun 10/4 at Indianapolis - LOSE
Sun 10/11 Jacksonville - WIN
Sun 10/18 Arizona - WIN
bye
Sun 11/1 at Dallas - LOSE (toss up)
Sun 11/8 Detroit - WIN
Sun 11/15 at Arizona - LOSE
Sun 11/22 at Minnesota - LOSE
Sun 11/29 at St. Louis - WIN
Sun 12/6 San Francisco - WIN
Sun 12/13 at Houston - WIN
Sun 12/20 Tampa Bay - WIN
Sun 12/27 at Green Bay - WIN
Sun 1/3 Tennessee - LOSE

So it looks like I was pretty much just wrong on the Bears game so far.

I want to change some of those picks, too.
 
Feb 14, 2004
16,667
4,746
113
41
While this may be true, your team falls into the "losing teams" category, Ron.

So tell me how that tidbit works in your team's favor again.. I must have missed that part.
Yes the Hawks have a losing record so far, but if we win this week, we'll be 3-3, which isn't a losing or winning record going into the Cowboys game, and like I've been saying, the Hawks are expecting two key defensive key players back for the Cowboys game.
 
Apr 25, 2002
9,595
5
38
Yes the Hawks have a losing record so far, but if we win this week, we'll be 3-3, which isn't a losing or winning record going into the Cowboys game
You might wanna worry about beating Arizona before you worry about being a 3-3 team for the Cowboys game. Let's not forget that your two wins came against the worst team in the league and another bottom-5 team. The Seahawks have played 3 decent-to-good teams and have lost to all 3 of them. The Cowboys and Cardinals are decent teams, so it's not unfeasible to think the trend will continue.

Even if they do slip by Arizona and go into the Cowboys game at 3-3, the statement you made doesn't mean anything because they still won't be a "winning" team. What else you got in the way of reasoning?


Ron Jaworski said:
and like I've been saying, the Hawks are expecting two key defensive key players back for the Cowboys game.
Yeah yeah, they've sucked because of injuries and nothing else, we get it.
 

phil

Sicc OG
Apr 25, 2002
7,311
27
0
115
So was I, but I knew Pittsburgh would win. The Rams were the closest thing to a rivalry for us in the first few years of the 2000s, but that didn't last long enough for it to stick. The Seahawks haven't been around long enough and the Cardinals have never been any good.

Just because those teams are in our division doesn't make them rivals, it only means we have to play them twice a year and we need to end the season with a better record than them or a better record than the rest of the NFC teams that didn't finish 1st in their division. Other than that, the Rams, Seahawks and Cardinals mean nothing to me.

I just find it amusing that savage quietly hates on the Niners all the time as if we had some sort of history with his team. By "quietly" I mean he doesn't come right out and start hating, he just goes against the Niners whenever possible and gives them no credit or as little credit as possible. 'Ole Savage Jaworski, that's what I'ma call him from now on. LOL.
i consider the falcons and niners a bigger rivalry than the cards or seahawks even though its not much of a rivalry when its onesided for the mostpart.
 
Feb 14, 2004
16,667
4,746
113
41
You might wanna worry about beating Arizona before you worry about being a 3-3 team for the Cowboys game. Let's not forget that your two wins came against the worst team in the league and another bottom-5 team. The Seahawks have played 3 decent-to-good teams and have lost to all 3 of them. The Cowboys and Cardinals are decent teams, so it's not unfeasible to think the trend will continue.

Even if they do slip by Arizona and go into the Cowboys game at 3-3, the statement you made doesn't mean anything because they still won't be a "winning" team. What else you got in the way of reasoning?




Yeah yeah, they've sucked because of injuries and nothing else, we get it.
Yeah yeah keep talking bitch. You're just mad I don't pick the 9ers in each game they play, and you resort into calling me a name of some sports analyst. That's all good with me. It don't bother me none. I'll pick the 9ers to win when ever I feel the other team isn't good enough to beat them, but you can be for damn sure I'll be picking my team over the 9ers when we meet again at Qwest Field.
 
Mar 10, 2007
2,603
57
0
37
Yeah yeah keep talking bitch. You're just mad I don't pick the 9ers in each game they play, and you resort into calling me a name of some sports analyst. That's all good with me. It don't bother me none. I'll pick the 9ers to win when ever I feel the other team isn't good enough to beat them, but you can be for damn sure I'll be picking my team over the 9ers when we meet again at Qwest Field.
Don't cry when Willis sends your old washed up QB to the IR list.
 
Feb 14, 2004
16,667
4,746
113
41
C'mon now, that was stupid. Willis already got his shot at Hass and look what Hass did this past weekend. What did Willis do this past weekend?