2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor 6.2 - First Drive Review

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Yay or Nay

  • Yay

    Votes: 4 50.0%
  • Nay

    Votes: 4 50.0%

  • Total voters
    8

DuceTheTruth

No Flexxin No Fakin
Apr 1, 2003
6,884
6,017
1
45
#1
2010 Ford F-150 SVT Raptor 6.2 - First Drive Review
Ford’s off-road all-star and its new 6.2-liter V-8 make a fantastic couple.

BY JARED GALL, PHOTOGRAPHY BY ROBERT KERIAN
May 2010



As the most radical off-road production pickup ever, the Ford F-150 SVT Raptor can teach a person a lot of things. On a dreary Michigan day, lessons flowed like the rivulets of runoff coursing through our backwoods driving loop at Ford’s Romeo proving grounds. (O Romeo, Romeo! Wherefore art thou Romeo? Just about an hour north of Detroit.) Lesson 1: Horsepower actually is man’s best friend. Lesson 2: Mud really does demand its own tire. Lesson 3: When life hands you a Raptor, sometimes you just gotta go nuts.

Lesson 1

Launched in 2009, the Raptor met with rave reviews everywhere it turned—or jumped, given its 11.2 and 12.1 inches of front and rear suspension travel, respectively. Our only complaint was the engine. Ford’s antiquated 5.4-liter V-8, with 310 hp and 365 lb-ft of torque, was adequate, but when the rest of the Raptor shines so brilliantly, “adequate” is as glaringly out of place as having Nickelback open for Mozart



The optional 6.2-liter V-8, new for 2010, was in the plan all along, Ford tells us, and a quick turn behind the wheel seems to verify that. The character of this engine matches the truck perfectly. With 411 hp and 434 lb-ft of torque, it imbues the Raptor’s powertrain with the same unflinching capability as the long-travel suspension does the chassis. The Raptor’s 6.2 is structurally identical to the 6.2-liter in the 2011 Super Duty lineup, but its output is higher than the SD’s 385 hp and 405 lb-ft thanks to unique cams and tuning.



While our slog through muddy Michigan woods didn’t give us the chance to experience the high-speed off-road stability demonstrated by the truck’s desert introduction, it proved that horsepower is helpful everywhere, and at much lower speeds than the truck’s sand-scorching limits. Whether powering up a slippery slope or powersliding through a gravel autocross, the 6.2 commands the truck with far greater authority than the 5.4-liter. The conditions this truck was conceived to conquer require the throttle frequently be used for directional control, and the bigger engine meets those demands every time.

Lesson 2

Well, maybe not every time. A spring deluge removed a critical component from our drive of the more powerful Raptor: steering input. So slick and soft were the muddy trails that we ended up enslaved by the goopy ruts the lead truck carved, obeying them like a train powerlessly following its tracks. We could have removed our hands from the wheel and followed the lead truck just as faithfully.



SVT engineers explained that the BFGoodrich All-Terrain rubber selected for the Raptor is the best compromise they could find between on-road behavior and the various off-road conditions—desert sand, boulders, loose sand, snow, mud—but that they are weakest in mud. Compared to a dedicated mud tire, the small and tightly spaced tread blocks too easily pack with gunk just as slick as the surface on which you are driving. Imagine the traction of driving on wet ice with tires made of wet ice, and you’re remarkably close. At one point on a narrow trail surrounded by dense forest, we slid completely sideways down a steep grade for about 10 feet before a bump snagged the rear of the truck and the nose swung around, narrowly avoiding a tree before we matted the throttle to climb up a hill between two tightly spaced trees.



Later, out in the open of a higher-speed dirt—now mud, of course—track, a truck wearing chunky mud tires proved the superiority of such rubber in those conditions, easily ripping its way out of existing ruts and powering down the straights 10 mph faster than the stock-tired trucks. The SVT team said that, despite the obvious benefit in our conditions, the mud tire is too much of a compromise in anything else. While we didn’t have the chance to experience that tire on-road ourselves, looking at those big, soft tread blocks and imagining their frightening capacity for deformation had us nodding in agreement. Still, Midwestern buyers of the Raptor will seriously want to consider owning a set of mud tires.



Lesson 3

Away from the muck and the mire, we proceeded to our next challenge: a gravel autocross that provided the day’s best opportunity to experience the throttle-steering abilities of the 6.2’s 411 hp. Every driver in our group looked like a rally champion tossing the Raptor through the cones of the handling course, and the broad power band of the new engine made it simple to link multiple turns in one gratuitous pendulum swing of gravel-slinging glory.



Also helping even the chumps look like champs was the extreme leeway allowed by the stability-control system’s Sport mode. Sport mode is engaged at the first push of the stability-control button, when traction control is disabled. The threshold for intervention is exceedingly high, allowing yaw rates that had us forgetting entirely that any electronic aids were still on. To turn the system fully off, hold the button for eight seconds and release, although you never need to do this. Well, almost never. In the greasiest mud, momentum is to be conserved no matter which direction it’s carrying the truck. If there aren’t any trees to hit, we learned it’s better to careen off the course than risk slowing down. In Michigan muck, it turns out there are a lot of ways to get stuck.



A Winning Partnership

Brilliant as the 5.4-liter Raptor is off-road, its worst on-road habit is laziness. With a truck weighing 6000 pounds and an engine producing barely over 300 hp, that’s inevitable. Not so with the bigger motor. In our testing, the smaller engine lugged the truck to 60 mph in 8.0 seconds. Expect the 6.2 to drop that time to somewhere around 7.1 seconds. Not only that, but the roar from the new mill is fantastic, as stirring as the powerboat soundtrack of the Cadillac Escalade’s 6.2-liter V-8, but without the novelty of being so exceedingly out of place—depending on how you look at it, that can be either a positive or a negative. Our lone complaint about the Raptor is that, for truly hectic off-road dashes—so, all of them—the transmission could use paddle shifters or some form of manumatic control for better ratio management.



Although hardly a drag racer, the Raptor 6.2 had nobody asking for more power. The SVT team tells us that not only do we not need more power, we don’t actually want more, either. Too much, they say, and the Raptor would run a much higher risk of snapping axles and otherwise munching itself. We’d say that sounds like loser talk if we weren’t so completely satisfied with the truck and this new engine. Its $3000 premium over the base engine—bumping the base price from $38,995 to $41,995—shouldn’t deter anyone. The 6.2-liter V-8 is the most essential of all Raptor options.



 

BASEDVATO

Judo Chop ur Spirit
May 8, 2002
8,623
20,808
113
44
#5
i could see it in all black looking aIIIGHT

but that big ford across the grill is wack like they ripped a Nike shoe idea
 
Aug 9, 2005
5,460
301
83
#7

You know....come to think of it every for ive ever owned has ran like a champ! I had an 98 expedition from 2000 to 2006 that Never broke down, not even once???? Auntie still has a taurus she bought in 93 it has had a few break downs but has ran like a champ for her too? uncle has a thunderbird with almost 300,000 miles rarely ever had anything wrong with it? ???? that havent been over the years the most stylish whips but im my experience they have been good cars.
 
Jan 6, 2008
4,632
395
0
35
www.youtube.com
#8
You know....come to think of it every for ive ever owned has ran like a champ! I had an 98 expedition from 2000 to 2006 that Never broke down, not even once???? Auntie still has a taurus she bought in 93 it has had a few break downs but has ran like a champ for her too? uncle has a thunderbird with almost 300,000 miles rarely ever had anything wrong with it? ???? that havent been over the years the most stylish whips but im my experience they have been good cars.
my dad is a ford mechanic and would never support me in the buying of a ford lol. he has a ford van, and thats it. and he works on that thing more than he drives it
 

DuceTheTruth

No Flexxin No Fakin
Apr 1, 2003
6,884
6,017
1
45
#9
F.O.R.D.

http://www.abbreviations.com/FORD.......lol

I used to beleive in ALL that back in the day.....lol

But over time I've come to beleive that for the most part, a car will treat you how you treat it. Granted, you will have the obvious failures (water pump, thermostat, alternator, fuel pump ect) but if you do the basics to the engine (scheduled tune-ups, keep antifreeze/water levels right)...you shouldnt be blowin head gaskets and seizin up your engines or throwin rods....LISTEN to the car sometimes....the car really can talk to you sometimes if you listen..

Any car will break if all you do is just put gas in it and drive it everday.....some are just stronger than others..

And if thats true then that means the Germans/Japanese have been the fittest and the Americans/and most others have been the weakest..

all that is changing now..
 
Apr 26, 2006
4,496
3
0
38
#10
I don't know why people like to clown on Ford. Their the best American auto company and have stood through this tough recession as a role model for success.

I'm all for Ford, GMC and other American companies doing good. Why hate on American stuff? No wonder the economy is fucked. :confused:




BTW, sick ass fucking truck. Finally one that seems able to take a true off-road beating str8 from the factory. Looks like a fun desert toy.
 
Apr 19, 2008
1,119
13
0
36
#11
the only ford i would get, would be a 66-69 mustang. i still prefer a chevy camero, though.

people that are anti ford, doesnt make them anti gmc. i know plenty of passed workers from gmc who dont like ford and visa versa. that includes me
 
Oct 3, 2006
5,631
1,842
113
38
#13
I don't know why people like to clown on Ford. Their the best American auto company and have stood through this tough recession as a role model for success.

I'm all for Ford, GMC and other American companies doing good. Why hate on American stuff? No wonder the economy is fucked. :confused:




BTW, sick ass fucking truck. Finally one that seems able to take a true off-road beating str8 from the factory. Looks like a fun desert toy.
all for friendly rivalry..shits and giggles...i would choose gm over for anyday, but that dont mean i dislike ford...my car after hs was a 98 mustang gt and it ran great with hella mileage, and i drove that fucker every week 6 hrs and back from the mojave in that hot ass weather durin the summer...
 

j19

Sicc OG
Oct 23, 2008
478
0
0
42
#15
im not sure what it costs but w/ about 10-15 grand & a 5grand pick u could distroy that ford...but i wouldnt mind fucking that shit up in Glamis
 
Apr 26, 2003
10,869
16,112
0
60
East Oakland, USA
#16
Its pretty cool, I dont like the big ass FORD across the front though...Its pretty sick cutting up the dunes and what not, but I think it would be cooler as a lowered street truck, more like the last gen lightning...especially since nobody with offroad stuff ever actually takes it off road.
 

L.D.S.

The Bakersman
Aug 14, 2006
19,934
4,044
113
40
Mizzourah
#17
My boys down here in the Midwest use their four wheel drives to destroy the wilderness, so I'm sure it won't be long until I see one of these even more hopped up and lifted exploring the back woods.