So pretty much, since, oh, GAME 2 when the warriors were getting pasted around the court by the jazz, i was practically begging for foyle to be put in because i think he could have gave us that big man prescence we would have needed to counter against boozer and millsap..
my boys dont think so, but then they dont know about sports and strategizing the way i do, so i dont count their opinion too much..the warriors have turiaf now, and you see how that helped them against the jazz tonight, MINUS biedrins..
i think if nellie had played foyle, the games at least would have been closer and i think we might have either gone 7 games or won the series..i mean, in 07, our "big men" were biedrins and harrington, and we all know how easily they can get knocked around..
what do u guys think?
my boys dont think so, but then they dont know about sports and strategizing the way i do, so i dont count their opinion too much..the warriors have turiaf now, and you see how that helped them against the jazz tonight, MINUS biedrins..
i think if nellie had played foyle, the games at least would have been closer and i think we might have either gone 7 games or won the series..i mean, in 07, our "big men" were biedrins and harrington, and we all know how easily they can get knocked around..
what do u guys think?