2007-2008 NBA SEASON PREDICTIONS!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

CZAR

Sicc OG
Aug 25, 2003
7,269
1,375
0
52
#1
Its that time yall! Lets see who dey shit!!! Here go my predicitons for the upcoming season!! Lets see if yall can hang with a Guru!!

Eastern Conference

Atlantic
Boston Celtics
New Jersey Nets
Toronto Raptors
New York Knicks
Philadelphia 76ers

Central
Chicago Bulls
Cleveland Cavaliers
Detroit Pistons
Indiana Pacers
Milwaukee Bucks

Southeast
Orlando Magic
Washington Wizards
Miami Heat
Charlotte Bobcats
Atlanta Hawks

Western Conference

Southwest
Dallas Mavericks
San Antonio Spurs
New Orleans Hornets
Houston Rockets
Memphis Grizzlies

Northwest
Denver Nuggets
Utah Jazz
Portland Trailblazers
Seattle Supersonics
Minnesota Timberwolves

Pacific
Phoenix Suns
Golden State Warriors
L.A. Lakers
Sacramento Kings
L.A. Clippers

MVP: LeBron James
Coach of the year: Scott Skiles
Rookie of year: K. Durant

All NBA Team
G. S. Nash
G. K. Bryant
F. L. James
F. K. Garnett
C. D. Howard

Playoffs Seeds

Eastern Conference
1.Chicago Bulls
2.Cleveland Cavaliers
3.Orlando Magic
4.Boston Celtics
5.Detroit Pistons
6.Washington Wizards
7.New Jersey Nets
8.Miami Heat

Western Conference
1.Phoenix Suns
2.Dallas Mavericks
3.San Antonio Spurs
4.Denver Nuggets
5.Utah Jazz
6.Golden State Warriors
7.New Orleans Hornets
8.Houston Rockets

Eastern Conference Finals: Cleveland Cavaliers vs Chicago Bulls

Western Conference Finals: San Antonio Spurs vs Phoenix Suns

NBA Finals: Chicago Bulls vs Phoenix Suns

NBA Champions: Phoenix Suns


there it is!! Top Dat!! Got Em!!!
 
Jun 11, 2007
1,148
4
0
36
#3
I'm to lazy to predict standings so

Western Conference Finals
Dallas def Phoenix (Unless there matched with the warriors again... :))

Eastern Conference Finals
Cavaliers def Pistons again

Finals
I dont care...

I also think Boston will get eliminated in the 2nd round, people have been talking about them like there unstoppable and shit...
 
Jan 28, 2005
2,939
7
0
#4
my finals:

Detroit Pistons and Phoenix Suns

ya'll are trippin for thinking Chicago will surpass Detroit. I dont think Cleveland will have the same spark this year neither.

and Orlando isn't doing shit, especially without Grant Hill's 8-12 points off the bench like they had last post-season
 
Feb 5, 2006
9,995
47
0
#7
WEST
------
1.MAVERICKS
2.SPURS
3.SUNS
4.ROCKETS
5.JAZZ
6.NUGGETS
7.WARRIORS
8.LAKERS
9.BLAZERS
10.SONICS
11.KINGS
12.TIMBERWOLVES
13.HORNETS
14.GRIZZLIES
15.CLIPPERS



EAST
-----
1.BULLS
2.PISTONS
3.CAVALIERS
4.HEAT
5.CELTICS
6.MAGIC
7.RAPTORS
8.WIZARDS
9.KNICKS
10.NETS
11.BOBCATS
12.PACERS
13.HAWKS
14.BUCKS
15.76ERS
 
Nov 14, 2002
2,204
0
0
40
#8
Due to the fact that the NBA is atrocious right now and I hardly even follow it anymore these picks are highly un-educated and pretty much just pulled out my ass.

WESTERN CONFERENCE

Pacific: Suns, Warriors, Lakers [With Kobe. If he's traded mid-season then we'll probably finish 5th.], Clippers, Kings
Northwest: Nuggets, Jazz, Blazers, Sonics, Wolves
Southwest: Mavericks, Spurs, Rockets, Hornets, Grizzlies

Playoff seeding: Suns, Mavericks, Spurs, Nuggets, Rockets, Warriors, Jazz, Lakers

Champs: Spurs

EASTERN CONFERENCE

Atlantic: Celtics, Nets, Raptors, Knicks, Sixers
Central: Bulls, Cavs, Pistons, Pacers, Bucks
Southeast: Wizards, Heat, Magic, Bobcats, Hawks

Playoff seeding: Bulls, Celtics, Cavs, Wizards, Heat, Magic, Pistons, Nets

Champs: Bulls if Kobe is traded to them, Celtics if not

NBA Finals 2008: Spurs d. Bulls/Celtics in 5
 
May 3, 2002
5,064
859
113
45
#11
Eastern Conference

Central
Chicago Bulls
Cleveland Cavaliers
Detroit Pistons
Indiana Pacers
Milwaukee Bucks

Playoffs Seeds

Eastern Conference
1.Chicago Bulls
2.Cleveland Cavaliers
3.Orlando Magic
4.Boston Celtics
5.Detroit Pistons
6.Washington Wizards
7.New Jersey Nets
8.Miami Heat
Correct me if i'm wrong but don't the teams that win their division get the top seeds, then the it goes by records....if that being the case how can Chicago & Cleveland be the 1-2 seeds in the East?
 

CZAR

Sicc OG
Aug 25, 2003
7,269
1,375
0
52
#12
Ill correct u then! They changed that rule last year. The three division winners have to atleast get 3 of the top 4 seeds, but if a team who has a better record then a division winner, then they can jump them in the seedings, but as long as the three division winners are in the top four then its str8!! Like last year in the east the seeds were

1. Detroit
2. Cleveland
3. Toronto
4. Miami
5. Chicago

So as u can see Detroit & Cleveland are in the same division but they were 1 & 2! U get it?? Holla!! Got Em!!
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
#13
Correct me if i'm wrong but don't the teams that win their division get the top seeds, then the it goes by records....if that being the case how can Chicago & Cleveland be the 1-2 seeds in the East?
Not in the NBA, bro....they go on best record to least best record 1-8. Doesnt matter who is in what division.

Read this:

"On August 3, 2006, the NBA announced the current revised playoff seeding system. Some consider the current system to be flawed, as where two teams who are not division winners have tied records, one can gain an inflated seeding by moving into the top four seeding based solely on tiebreakers.

An example of this criticism arose in the very first season of the new system. As things stood of April 17, 2007 (with one regular season game left for all teams except the Phoenix Suns and the Atlanta Hawks), the Chicago Bulls would have had the second seed with a second-place Central Division record of 49-32. The Cleveland Cavaliers possessed an identical 49-32 record, but because Chicago won the tie-breakers between them, Cleveland would have made it no higher than fifth, despite having more wins than the fourth-seeded Miami Heat, who clinched the Southeastern Division.

Under the previous seeding system, with division winners receiving the top three seeds, Cleveland would still have been fifth, but Chicago would have been fourth. Miami, being the division winner with the lowest record, would in that case have been third.

On April 18, the Bulls lost while Cleveland won their respective final games. The result was that Cleveland finished with one more win than the Bulls, putting Chicago in the fifth seed, despite finishing with the third-best record in the Eastern Conference, and placing Cleveland in the second seed.

The contrasting argument to this critique is that the second seeding does not afford a team home-court advantage in any playoff round. Additionally, the fifth seed would play the weakest division winner in Miami, while the second seed would play a weak seventh seed. Were the teams seeded fourth and fifth, they would have played each other - meaning a stronger opponent for both teams than the one faced under the new system, allowing the two stronger teams to both advance (which they both did) to the second round. The criticism raised in 2006 (see below) was successfully addressed by the new system, as top-seeded Detroit ultimately faced and were defeated by second seeded (with the second-best record in the East) Cleveland in the Conference Finals."
 

CZAR

Sicc OG
Aug 25, 2003
7,269
1,375
0
52
#15
Yea but its not best record 1-8, its just that if one team that is in second is better than a divisin winner, then they jump them in the top 4 but the three division winners still have to get a top four seed, so they give one spot record wise! kinda hard to explain but I think yall get it!! Got Em!!
 
Jan 12, 2006
13,259
1,117
0
#16
Playoffs Seeds

Eastern Conference
1.Chicago Bulls
2.Cleveland Cavaliers
3.Orlando Magic
4.Boston Celtics
5.Detroit Pistons
6.Washington Wizards
7.New Jersey Nets
8.Miami Heat

Western Conference
1.Phoenix Suns
2.Dallas Mavericks
3.San Antonio Spurs
4.Denver Nuggets
5.Utah Jazz
6.Golden State Warriors
7.New Orleans Hornets
8.Houston Rockets


there it is!! Top Dat!! Got Em!!!
HA HA HA LOL. GOT EM!