2004 Will Be the U.S.’s Best Year Economically in Last Twenty Years

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#1
http://www.conference-board.org/economics/press.cfm?press_ID=2284
Economic News
2004 Will Be the U.S.’s Best Year Economically in Last Twenty Years
Dec. 11, 2003

Revising its year-end economic forecast sharply upward, The Conference Board today projected that real GDP growth will hit 5.7% next year, making 2004 the best year economically in the last 20 years.

The forecast, by Conference Board Chief Economist Gail Fosler, expects worker productivity, which set a 20-year record in the third quarter, to rise at a healthy 3.6% next year. That would follow a gain of 4.3% this year.

The economic forecast is prepared for more than 2,500 corporate members of The Conference Board’s global business network, based in 60 nations.

Key Barometers Flashing Growth

“Growing business spending and continued strength in consumer spending are generating growth throughout the U.S. economy,” says Fosler. “This burgeoning strength is reflected in The Conference Board’s widely-watched Leading Economic Indicators, the Consumer Confidence Index and the Help-Wanted Advertising Index. While the labor market, a critical factor in sustaining growth, is growing slowly, a pick-up in hiring may already have begun.”

Real consumer spending, which continues to fuel growth, will increase at a 4.7% pace next year, up from about 3.2% this year. Another gain of 4.3% is projected for 2005.

While the U.S. economy is expected to generate more than one million new jobs next year, the unemployment rate will edge down only slightly, averaging 5.6% in 2004.

The Conference Board forecast notes that as the U.S. economy bounces back, so is Europe, although growth will be subdued compared to most other major parts of the world. “For all the concern about a weak dollar,” says Fosler, “the dollar will be worth more than the euro by the end of the year.”

Real capital spending, which will rise by only 2.7% this year, will climb 11.7% next year and another 8.6% in 2005. Pre-tax corporate operating profits will top $1 trillion next year, up from a projected $928 billion this year. Another trillion-dollar-plus gain in profits is expected in 2005.

The continued recovery in business profits, which was a key ingredient in funding new investment (crucial in making 2004 a strong growth year), depends on price relief. Business profits will benefit from both improved volume and recovering profit margins in 2004, as inflation creeps back toward 3% by the end of the year.
 
G

g211

Guest
#4
I always wondered if Bush and his coons planned this, the peak of his tax cut plan hits nex mid-year, more xtra money in peeps pockets, make them happy, now Bush is hoping sicne thyre happy theyll vote for his snake bitch azz in 04...very deceptive, after nex year it goes down from there, more peeps thinkin they have a job, get knocked off...

also, I got a problem with tax-cuts, a wealthy person gets their share, so does the common man, now the wealthy person already having daddy warbucks will just invest it save it, good for him, he doesnt have to spend it now...but tha avg joe, if he does not invest, or save his tax cut money, hes gonna go out and spend it on worthless shitless materialistic goods - which really dont mean shit in tha long run, goods in which say daddy warbucks invested in or owns tha company that produced tha goods, so then not only does daddy warbucks get his tax cut, but he also gets a majority or all of avg joe's tax cut too, thats fuxxed up, what a trap...thats democracy free to do what you want,even if ya didnt ask to get rammed in tha cheeks.
 

shep

Sicc OG
Oct 2, 2002
3,233
2
0
#5
i guess when you are spending money like crazy to help pay for a war that did nothing, the economy will go up some.
 
Sep 13, 2002
1,983
0
0
41
#6
people that dont work or claim they cant find were are full of shit.

people that blame the president for it are even more full of shit.


i dont pay that much in taxes. im not gonna complain. now if i was makin 100,000 a year or even 50,000 then id have a reason to complain.
 
May 13, 2002
218
0
0
44
www.thechill.com
#7
The funny thing is whoever becomes president is going to be riding the tide of the upward economic cycle--and they are going to pretend like they had something to do with it. And just as I predicted before the last election that the future president would be BLAMED for the suffering economy -- I will be right in the thought that this president will get CREDIT for the prospering economy for no valid reason.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#8
g211 said:
also, I got a problem with tax-cuts, a wealthy person gets their share, so does the common man, now the wealthy person already having daddy warbucks will just invest it save it, good for him, he doesnt have to spend it now...
you act like it is the governments money in the first place and they are giving it away.

the important thing here to remember is that the money that is given back to you via the tax cuts is YOUR MONEY not the governemnts.

g211 said:
but tha avg joe, if he does not invest, or save his tax cut money, hes gonna go out and spend it on worthless shitless materialistic goods -
whos fault is it that the average joe spends his own money (tax cuts) on worthless shit???

g211 said:


goods in which say daddy warbucks invested in or owns tha company that produced tha goods, so then not only does daddy warbucks get his tax cut, but he also gets a majority or all of avg joe's tax cut too, thats fuxxed up, what a trap...thats democracy free to do what you want,even if ya didnt ask to get rammed in tha cheeks.
and average joe spends his tax cuts (which is his own money) on daddy warbucks goods, which leads daddy warbucks company to have to produce more goods since average joe is spending more of his own money on daddy warbucks goods. so daddy warbucks goes out and hires more average joe's and expands his company to meet the higher demand of goods that the average joes can spend on since tax cuts gives them more of their own money to spend.
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#9
proppa said:
i dont pay that much in taxes. im not gonna complain. now if i was makin 100,000 a year or even 50,000 then id have a reason to complain.
but the funny thing is that most people (not you, but others) that dont pay much in taxes dont complain when their tax burden is small (15% or less) and the guy that makes alote of money is forking over 50% of what he is earning, but as soon as tax cuts are talked about the people that are paying little to no taxes start complaining that the "rich" are going to get a tax cut.
 
May 2, 2002
9,580
17
0
42
#10
McClean.... why bother?

This forum is jam packed with extreme, irrational liberals... Why even try?

Obviously, the ecomonic future of their country and the financial well-being of their children/family/selves isn't important.
 
May 29, 2002
4,310
3
0
41
#11
Psycho Logic said:
McClean.... why bother?

This forum is jam packed with extreme, irrational liberals... Why even try?

Obviously, the ecomonic future of their country and the financial well-being of their children/family/selves isn't important.
that irrationality is what makes em liberals. You cant argue with a liberal, they will just make up another conspiracy theory with no backing thus it cannot be argued against.

but I hope this is true because I work off commission in retail and this past year has been horrible. 2004 will likely be my last year working in retail and it would be nice to make some good money entering into my final two years of college
 
Jul 10, 2002
2,180
18
0
45
#12
'The poor get poorer
and rich keep gettin' richer,
These whores keep whorin'
and us pimps keep gettin richer'

E-40

That's real iShhh right there. Tax cuts don't do anything but benefit the wealthy, look at the last three years and the economy. The gap keeps getting wider. All the tax cuts do is cut programs like the Boys & Girls Clubs, Americorp, and other social spending programs to people who need the services the most. Like there aren't enough loop holes in the tax system already, why not give the upper 5% who already controls 90+% of the countries wealth more money for their estate? It's nebulous to believe that cutting taxes for the upper tiers circulates more capital through the economy, anyone who can read cyclical economic history can vow for this.

The rich stay rich by oppressing the poor, its no secret its been going on since the Roman era, and effectualy every modern society collapses b/c of its own greed. Greed is a killer. For those that follow the stock market, like Jim Crammer says Bulls make money, Bears make money, but PIGS get slaughtered.

Additionally, as a side note, any imbecile w/ and oz. of financial literacy can tell you that 'WAR' time is a great catalyst for any ecomony. Once again, do some historical research and It'll tell ya I ain't B.Sn ya. Real talk pimp juice! (and to get off on a tangent, I think we should reinstate the draft and let these rich ass trustfund parents get a taste of how real war is, and that it ain't something that they can just turn on and off when they watch the evening news at dinner) People would be a lot less ardent when they kids ain't got a choice to go fight and die for some of Bush's rich croonies at Haliburton ect. Do you ever think Bush would let his daughter serve, Hell NAW! Its the minorities and poor who loose, hands down no argument.

Open your eyes.

It all comes down to a Lack of Respect
 
May 8, 2002
4,729
0
0
48
#14
Jomodo said:
Tax cuts don't do anything but benefit the wealthy, look at the last three years and the economy.
FIRST OF ALL EVERY1 BENEFITS FROM ACROSS THE BOARD TAX CUTS.

SECOND EVERY ECONOMIC INDICATOR IS SHOWING THAT THE ECONOMY HAS ALREADT BEEN JUMPSTARTED (AND MANY WOULD SAY BECAUSE OF THE TAX CUTS) AND BACK ON TRACK.

Jomodo said:
All the tax cuts do is cut programs like the Boys & Girls Clubs, Americorp, and other social spending programs to people who need the services the most.
READ THE CONSTITUTION!! THE GOVERNEMNTS ONLY ROLE SHOULD BE TO PROTECT THE PEOPLE FROM AGRESSION FROM OTHER COUNTRIES (NATIONAL SECURITY) IT IN THE CONSTITUTION AND IN THE FEDERALIST PAPERS. IT ISNT THE ROLE OF THE GOVERNEMENT TO REDISTRIBUTE MONEY AND TO AWARD PEOPLE FRO MEDIOCRACY.

Jomodo said:
Like there aren't enough loop holes in the tax system already, why not give the upper 5% who already controls 90+% of the countries wealth more money for their estate?
BECAUSE THEY ARE ALREADY BEING DRAINED THROUGH AN UNFAIR TAX SYSTEM. THE MORE YOU MAKE THE HIGHER PERCENTAGE YOU ARE FORCED TO PAY. THAT IS NOT FAIR. THAT IS LIKE PUNISHING YOU FOR BEING SUCESSFUL

http://www.irs.ustreas.gov/pub/irs-soi/01in01ts.xls

Top 50% of Wage Earners Pay 96.03% of Income Taxes

Jomodo said:
It's nebulous to believe that cutting taxes for the upper tiers circulates more capital through the economy, anyone who can read cyclical economic history can vow for this.
CUTTING TAXES FOR UPPER INCOME EARNERS AND COMPANIES GIVES THEM THE INCENTIVE TO EXPAND AND BY DOING SO THEY HIRE MORE WORKERS AND THE ECONOMY GROWS AND MORE PEOPLE ARE MAKING MONEY.

Jomodo said:
(and to get off on a tangent, I think we should reinstate the draft and let these rich ass trustfund parents get a taste of how real war is, and that it ain't something that they can just turn on and off when they watch the evening news at dinner)
HEY THAT IS FINE BY ME MAYBE WE SHOULD BUT THEN IF WE REINSTATE THE DRAFT THAN WE SHOULDNT PAY THEM ANYMORE, WE WONT EDUCATE THEM ANYMORE AND WE WOULDNT GIVE THEM COLLEGE GRANTS.

THEN ALL THE POOR PEOPLE OR THE PEOPLE WHO GOT IN TO GET AN EDUCATION WILL BE RUINED. SO YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT IT BOTH WAYS

YA THERE ARE ALOTE OF POOR AND MINORITIES IN THE ARMED FORCES. YA THERE ISNT MANY RICH KIDS IN THE ARMED FORCES. BUT DONT THE ARMED FORCES BENEFIT THOSE SAME MINORITIES AND POOR PEOPLE MORE!!