2003 Jesus

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
May 11, 2002
4,039
12
0
44
#1
If you were to make let say the 'ultimate' human being. What would you make him or her like? What actions would you make him do to prove to the world that he/she was the 'ultimate' human being?
What race would he/she be?
What religion would he/she be?
What actions would you make he/she do?
How would he/she treat others?
What country would they be born in?
 

Furio

Sicc OG
Jul 30, 2002
475
0
0
38
#2
isnt a sin to think of some1 better than jesus? oh well, i'll see ya in hell.
i would make the kid be.........damn who is better than jesus? i couldnt even do it
 
May 11, 2002
4,039
12
0
44
#3
I don't think there is any human who is greater then Jesus. This is why I posted this topic. I wanted to show that NO human can write or create the, ultimate human being.
 
May 11, 2002
4,039
12
0
44
#5
Scientist who did something positive for man kind? What creating nuclear bombs? weapons of mass destruction? What about all the pollution which is depleating the ozone layer? Now the greenhouse gasses are being traped, now tepmatures are rising and the ice caps are melting, in about 200 years the south east of the United States will be under water. So much for technology...

Jesus was the ultimate human being because he did what he said. He performed miracles, cured the sick, helped and fed the poor. His life was dedicated to better humanity. Because of his works he was persecuted and then of course put on the cross and died. In which he later would rise again. His undestanding of human nature was far superior then any humans understanding, he was far ahead of his time. He always put others first before himself. Everything he said or did was perfect, he set the standard. He preeched equality and to treat others as we would want to be treated.
Jesus's entire life was dedicated to mankind. That's what he lived for and thats why he died for. I cannot think of a scientist who has done more for the world then Jesus did. He only lived to be 30 too. His life was short yet what impact he had in such a short period of time.
 
Dec 27, 2002
459
1
0
#7
There is no way a communist will ever understand the importance of Christ. But I think you should understand that "Jesus" is simply the name of the flesh body, while "Christ" is who Jesus *really* was. "Christ" or "Logos" desribes the spirit soul residing within the body of Jesus. One really must understand the difference between spirit and matter otherwise Jesus will be mistaken to be just a "human being", when in fact He is a perfectly pure spiritual being who accepted a material body so that we could learn from him.

The reality is that we ALL are pure spiritual beings because we are not our bodies, but we are our souls. Since we have fallen into this material world we are covered by the impure material energy and so our spiritual purity is unknown to us until we awaken and factually see the difference between spirit and matter.

As for scientists doing positive for mankind, you must be out your tree. Scientists are purely materialistic and therefore are not out to better mankind, they are out to fatten their pockets. One might think that technology and science are "positive", but this is only a subjective view based on them making one's life "easier". The truth is that they are not "positive", unless they are being used to further spiritual understanding. A person who is helping to liberate souls from the material condition is a person who is bettering mankind, not a scientist who is making biological weapons for his personal benefit.
 
Nov 17, 2002
2,627
99
48
42
www.facebook.com
#8
Jesus told some of the apostles that they will one day be like he is. I read a good quote from someone which said, "Jesus is the great example, not the great exception."
The Christ spirit dwells within all ready to be awakened by anyone. Our nature is to grow toward this awakening.

As far as scientists....
I wouldn't go as far to say that what scientists do, in general, is bad. Because I feel it is important to begin bridging the gap between matter and spirit; between science and religion. Yes, we should understand the difference between matter and spirit. But, we shouldn't separate them in reality to the point there is a wall of thought as there has been between the two.....