Search results

Should've read winning 49 ehh @BUTCHER 206 eh eh eh

Nice, a scenario where everyone wins Unlike gsw @cheeto @drunkaholic707

The much anticipated fight between unified light heavyweight titleholder Sergey Kovalev and undefeated former super middleweight world champion Andre Ward, two of boxing's pound-for-pound elites, has a date and a site -- as long as both can get through interim bouts this summer. The...

@cheeto @VERSACERO Look at what this dropout puta is saying about la raza

@jake921660 Fuck you change your avatar

And he is still going lol

It's not a cut and dry argument like whether yg invented bompton or not lol

Ok, like in every argument/debate involving you on here youre right and the other person is wrong and you'll continue a circular argument forever until the other gets tired of it. You win, you know absolutely everything mr. Inf.

You really dont need that crackpot to verify anything.

Seeing as this has been off topic for like 3 pages im about done now. RIP to those 49 people.

Well that's where the whole jade helm comes into play as well as other controversies where they were training with nato soldiers from other countries. Other soldiers could possibly do it or they could be desensitizing their own troops. Everyone in the military is on a need to know basis, theyre...

And dont make me bring up switzerland where the majority of the population is military trained and above a quarter of the population owns sig 550s yet has one of the lowest murder rates in the world. But the guns are the problem! Lmao

World bank and billion dollar corporations who pay politicians to amend laws run both our countries.

Regardless like i said you guys got your opinions and I got mine but I gotta ask do your trust your government, err, the corporations and the world bank that runs your government enough to completely disarm yourselves?

How? A cannon would knock down half your house from far away. A musket can miss someone 10ft away, that isn't superior firepower to you? Your argument is that the government strength is so much now that everyone should concede and hand over their weapons because rifles cant defend against...

They had many different cannons which Im sure the public couldnt own. Is a blunderbuss gonna do anything against a cannon? Anyway this is all a matter of opinion and interpretation. I doubt i could sway you guys and vice versa.

Well why are you trying to prove a point that nobody can? whether or not the founding fathers would support civilian ownership of assault rifles? If anything there is more evidence to show they would support it because it is equal firepower to what the government has. Just as muskets were equal...