Exactly?
Where did I say otherwise? lol
I said it's funny when Palestine shoots rockets and cries when retaliation happens. Should Palestine get a pass and be able to shoot rockets and Israel just shrug their shoulders and say "whelp, oh well, they're shooting them dang ol rockets again, let's just sit here and let it play out"?
It's a sloppy mess over there, but clearly if Palestine shoots rockets, Israel retaliates, what is the debate here?
Where did I say otherwise? lol
I said it's funny when Palestine shoots rockets and cries when retaliation happens. Should Palestine get a pass and be able to shoot rockets and Israel just shrug their shoulders and say "whelp, oh well, they're shooting them dang ol rockets again, let's just sit here and let it play out"?
It's a sloppy mess over there, but clearly if Palestine shoots rockets, Israel retaliates, what is the debate here?
You did not say otherwise. You find it funny when Palestinians shoot rockets and cry when retaliation happen. But you don't find it funny when Palestinians retaliate to Israeli occupation by shooting rockets?
Retaliation for you starts right where you choose for it to start; where it supports your worldview.
If you want to get deeper into self-awareness I would bet money on the fact that you took a side first and THEN you justified your feelings with this logic. If you related more to the Palestinians(by identification, relation, the mere physical proximity, the cultural proximity, etc) your stance would be "of course Palestinians will retaliate, the Israelis have been disregarding the UN partition plan under the false guise of security."
I am not saying that either side is right or wrong. I feel this is human nature playing itself out, and if it were Palestinians who had the military might and support of the US they would then be the ones trampling over what little would have remained of Israeli land.
-----
Since I am here talking, on a side note, after the recent London attacks Theresa May's solution was to plea for more internet control and surveillance and less privacy. Does the retaliation at all fit the crime?
Now do you really think any state, especially Israel given its last 50 years, is honest in its justification and retaliation to rocket attacks which have killed 26 Israelis from 2004-2014??? Even when the death toll exceeds 100,000, whether from cigarettes or drone attacks, to governments around the world we are all cannon fodder. So don't give me that crap about Israel is justified in its action because it is not. So cut it with the propagation or propaganda.
Dead people, pillaged land, and the absolute breaking of the human spirit are okay but only if our pious and humble leaders call the shots, right?