Who's behind the self-driving Google Maps cars?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Gas One

Moderator
May 24, 2006
39,741
12,147
113
45
Downtown, Pittsburg. Southeast Dago.
#5
self driving car does not mean there isnt passengers in it, my guy
a self driving car dosent have a drivers license.
certain rules for driving exist in the US.

its not like if it got pulled over it would spit out an ID with a car in the picture
one beep for yes
two beeps for no
 
Last edited:

Gas One

Moderator
May 24, 2006
39,741
12,147
113
45
Downtown, Pittsburg. Southeast Dago.
#8
you know how many youtube videos there would have been of a car driving with no one in the seat?

the nigga in the car was like, who the fuck is this god damn weirdo videotaping me behind me, following me everywhere i go? pull over.

end of youtube video.

he had that look on his face like he outsmarted your ass lmao
lil smirk like, "zOwned"

mixerr really thought he uncovered like some serious ass shit
like no ones ever followed the google car

everyone sees that shit, if no one was in the drivers seat in the vehicle you can trust that someone in america would have discovered that way before this video

i never thought that 'self driving car' meant, it was like michael nights car on night rider. i figured it meant it was a computerized version of a google maps using car with the same sort of technology tesla uses. if youve ever had a car with a chip in it you know how that works.

edit: the chip in the google car probably understands the programming of google maps and has a programming language that executes certain commands based on what google maps shows them, where they are. google maps has already taken so much knowledge about every street that on your iphone i0s w google it tells you how many feet you have before everything. use all this technology along with the vehicle and you have what is known as a self driving car. it probably drives really slow and mathematically solves the math of the road once again, based on the GPS system, how fast to move, how far/long the road is, where the stops are based on google maps, has sensors on the sides front and back to stop and go when needed, picks up the signals at the lights and taps into them to know when the lights are red and when they arent (think GTA V when you did the level where you hacked the computer to change the lights, except it just acts upon the lights) etc etc. modern engineering bro, if youre wowed by it, get into engineering. when you make computerized versions of vehicles, alot of things are possible. cars are already pretty much able to drive themselves anyway, thats what the newer chipped teslas do but most people want to drive themselves. they just combined that with GPS locationing powered by google, sensors and a chipped car that understands the languaging of the other computers/programs.
 
Last edited:
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
#10
Jesus Christ mixer. Most states, if not all, still require a "driver" in the vehicle. The car itself is driving, however the person can take over at any time. Same goes for the driverless trucks. It's going to be a few more years until they are legally allowed to drive with no human (Elon Musk says by 2019-2020). All of the Google mapping and driverless trucks are collecting data and perfecting the technology, it's a process Until then people are required in the vehicles.
 

Gas One

Moderator
May 24, 2006
39,741
12,147
113
45
Downtown, Pittsburg. Southeast Dago.
#11
mixerr, read my edit in my post before this, so you can understand what you probably dont a little better

sometimes you can be a little dim but i do know you have a good amount of intelligence in you, so take what i said and solve the rest of what you dont understand bro. but like 2-0-sixx and i said, cars cant legally drive without human passengers with drivers licenses, rules in america are still rules regardless of technology

lets say a self driving car hits a baby, we dont put a car in a jail cell
theres legal reasonings for a human having to be in the car bro

rare based late knowledge havin smart nigga edit
: and to be honest, logical fucking sense. google is protecting itself from an embarrassing fail by having a passenger and passenger in the drivers seat.
think about all the reasons why you would do that
who do you blame the self driving car on?

#simplescience
#yup yup

this post has been brought to you by absolut vodka, sour diesel, pink adderall, damn near pure cocaine,opium, backwoods, and a small kiss of liquid LSD. God bless.
 
Last edited:

Gas One

Moderator
May 24, 2006
39,741
12,147
113
45
Downtown, Pittsburg. Southeast Dago.
#13
what was that movie where the self driving uber car had beef with the nigga and was trying to kill him?

oh yeah hot tub time machine 2

shit was hilarious as fuck
better stoner movie than half baked EASILY
i saw that movie for the third time on hella acid and molly and the writer for the movie brilliantly fucked with my head so bad on psychedelics i threw up over my mind being blown

the only other time thats happened to me was the end of cabin fever, high on PCP
theres a joke at the end of the movie but the joke is like kind of a dark humored joke
everyone started laughing and i like threw up on trigger out of nowhere

i also went outside after that, sat on a curb pulled my dick out and pissed like two feet in front of me because i was having huge trouble standing or walking, right in front of the door that people who were just let out of their movie were coming out in droves, only to be horrified by me

one of those 'im so high i know theres a huge chance of me being arrested in public but thats going to be part of this trip and i totally dont give a fuck' nights

if you dont think theres a huge chance of the cops being called on you and locking you the fuck up, you aint really had fun on drugs in public yet. fuck all that 'do they know im high? fuck!" parinoia shit. they gotta KNOW you are on something and be SCARED.


NIIIIGHTS LIKE THIIIISS
 
Last edited:

Mixerr

Mixerr Reviews
Nov 17, 2012
3,970
8,919
113
31
Austin, Texas, US
www.facebook.com
#14
mixerr, read my edit in my post before this, so you can understand what you probably dont a little better

sometimes you can be a little dim but i do know you have a good amount of intelligence in you, so take what i said and solve the rest of what you dont understand bro. but like 2-0-sixx and i said, cars cant legally drive without human passengers with drivers licenses, rules in america are still rules regardless of technology

lets say a self driving car hits a baby, we dont put a car in a jail cell
theres legal reasonings for a human having to be in the car bro

rare based late knowledge havin smart nigga edit
: and to be honest, logical fucking sense. google is protecting itself from an embarrassing fail by having a passenger and passenger in the drivers seat.
think about all the reasons why you would do that
who do you blame the self driving car on?

#simplescience
#yup yup

this post has been brought to you by absolut vodka, sour diesel, pink adderall, damn near pure cocaine,opium, backwoods, and a small kiss of liquid LSD. God bless.
Then explain this. There are videos of the car driving itself.
self driving car does not mean there isnt passengers in it, my guy
a self driving car dosent have a drivers license.
certain rules for driving exist in the US.

its not like if it got pulled over it would spit out an ID with a car in the picture
one beep for yes
two beeps for no
That would be cool if it did.
 
Last edited:

Nuttkase

not nolettuce
Jun 5, 2002
38,746
159,554
113
44
at the welfare mall
#15
lol @ saying "Then explain this" and then posting a video that doesn't even have an actual self-driving car in that's driving but an animation of one.

Also I'm starting to think Mixerr doesn't get that the point of self-driving cars is to still have people in them being transported while the car does the driving. I believe he thinks there are just going to be a bunch of cars with no one in them driving around for the fuck of it all day or something.

*edit*

I see Gas already covered that last paragraph up thread.
 
Last edited:

Arson

Long live the KING!!!!
May 7, 2002
15,796
10,860
113
#16
lol @ saying "Then explain this" and then posting a video that doesn't even have an actual self-driving car in that's driving but an animation of one.

Also I'm starting to think Mixerr doesn't get that the point of self-driving cars is to still have people in them being transported while the car does the driving. I believe he thinks there are just going to be a bunch of cars with no one in them driving around for the fuck of it all day or something.

*edit*

I see Gas already covered that last paragraph up thread.
lol a self driving car driving with nobody in it, like a dog taking itself for a walk, mixer thanks for the laughs..
 

Arson

Long live the KING!!!!
May 7, 2002
15,796
10,860
113
#17
Ill drive a car that goes 0-130mph in 10 seconds, but i hate being in something I cant control like a roller coaster, even know they only go like 30-50mph.
 
#19
I won't be impressed with these cars until they can drive them selves like the one in Knight Rider.
And look like it, are bullet proof. And can do everything KIT did i the show.

Until then these cars look ugly and slow. and useless.

Also Dr. Claw is behind these cars. he secretly controls google from his hide out.
It's all part of the plan
 

Mixerr

Mixerr Reviews
Nov 17, 2012
3,970
8,919
113
31
Austin, Texas, US
www.facebook.com
#20
lol @ saying "Then explain this" and then posting a video that doesn't even have an actual self-driving car in that's driving but an animation of one.

Also I'm starting to think Mixerr doesn't get that the point of self-driving cars is to still have people in them being transported while the car does the driving. I believe he thinks there are just going to be a bunch of cars with no one in them driving around for the fuck of it all day or something.

*edit*

I see Gas already covered that last paragraph up thread.
Chill breh. I forgot to add this link.