Are you supporting OG Bernie Sanders?

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

ThaG

Sicc OG
Jun 30, 2005
9,597
1,687
113
#2
He's certainly talking the right things on some subjects and is the best option among the available candidates.

But he's still a professional politician who has managed to survive in the game for decades. That means blind trust in him would be foolish.

P.S. I had a chance some months ago to talk to someone who is closer to that world than I can ever hope to be, and to him specifically, and that suspicion turns out to be justified.

P.P.S. He's never getting the nomination anyway.
 
May 7, 2013
13,444
16,320
113
33°
www.hoescantstopme.biz
#11
There is no such thing as a legit candidate.
O REARY?

Declared 2016 Independent Presidential Candidate

Tami Stainfield
Computer Science and Political Studies expert
Born: July 20th, 1962 (age 53)

Independent candidate Tami Stainfield was born and raised in New Hampshire. After high school, she left New Hampshire to enroll at Indiana State University, where she received an athletic scholarship in field hockey and was eventually awarded a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science. After graduation, Stainfield spent eighteen years working and living in nine different states, with careers in banking, education, healthcare, IT, building automation and energy conservation. Today, she is living in Charleston, West Virginia.

Stainfield also traveled the world, visiting no less than 29 countries, including South Africa, where she received a Masters in Development from the Political Studies, Department of The University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg. She states that visits to so many different countries gave her a perfect opportunity to study “people’s” opinion on culture, business and politics, as well as their perception of correlation between these factors.

Cornerstone of Stainfield’s political program is Supreme Court definition of liberty, which defines liberty as “… not merely freedom from bodily restraint, but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life … and generally to enjoy those privileges long recognized at common law as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men … “ She presents herself as Anti-Globalist, and also criticizes party-based politics of United States, which is in her opinion, leading the country to “oligarchy and authoritarian principles”. One of the videos on Tami Stainfield’s YouTube channel shows one monologue of hers, featuring subject of mind control, which according to her, is an instrument widely used for forcing individuals to reason and behave in a certain way.

Tami Stainfield on brain and body science, and the 18-month occupation of her brain.

USA CONSTITUTION is the authority for the people not USA Party interests!

Today majority of Americans can no longer achieve or protect Amend 14 'life, LIBERTY or property'. Our nation is faced with a cost of living crisis due to the elected officials endless focus on their Party donors and members. Calculate 1% loan / raise fed rate / 16 T Debt -understand our Nation is in crisis due to USA Party members and their donors.

With grave concern USA Government is utilizing SCRIPTED Human Logistics and Robotics to Replace and Control Person's Body movements and functions- including voice and eyes!
President George Washington was a ‘no party’ independent who believed party conflicts would return our country to depotism. George Washington strongly discouraged political parties; he knew over time that parties would "subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government".

Today we are in the 21st century and Tami Stainfield has filed as a ‘no party’ candidate for the Presidency of the United States and United States Senator for West Virginia. Tami has become an independent voice that recognized our current political, judicial and corporate policies and behaviors were shifting towards oligarchy and authoritarian principles.

An Oligarchy form of government, is when groups control power and authority opposed to the 'Republican form of Government' where the elected officials govern for the people and authority is the Constitution. The ‘Republican form of Government’ our Founding Fathers envisioned remains a Guarantee in the Constitution.

The most powerful oligarchy organizations - Entertainment, Federal Government, Health and Technology have influenced or pressured elected officials to govern or not to, based on their products, services, financial interest and values, thereby usurping the powers of the Constitution and the rights of the people.

Furthermore, in Democracy in America (1835) Alexis de Tocqueville said, "great political parties are those more attached to principles than to consequences, to generalities rather than to particular cases, to ideas rather than to personalities".

Utilizing Tocqueville observation, Tami remains concerned with the following political behavior,

oligarchies function by utilizing public opinion versus the principles of the constitution;

govern by utilizing individual cases and solutions versus the general public’s interests;

and they use favoritism, popularity and associations to determine agency versus competency.

These powerful oligarchy’s also have the resources and power to control the amount and scope of protesting, accessibility to legal representation and quantity of research. Furthermore, instead of enacting legislation which has been evaluated and weighed in comparison to competing funds, resources and people rights/interests; we have legislation enacted on oligarchy interests.

Lastly, Tami is concerned with America's contribution to Global Apartheid, she defines;

Where, a small group of individuals from different countries, nationalities, religions, and races use propaganda, fear and power to segregate countries, corporations, organizations and individuals for the benefit of a few. 7/11















nm you right :siccness: :dead:
 
Last edited:

Chuco

Sicc OG
May 2, 2009
3,947
6,250
113
#15
Sanders has my vote. People hear "socialism" and start going nuts, but a majority of the folks I encounter who speak badly about socialism can't even define it. Moreover, Sanders is a Democratic Socialist. If you were to stick him in Europe, he'd be just another run of the mill politician. And the countries that utilize that system are far outperforming the US in a multitude of social and economic categories.
 
Last edited:
May 7, 2013
13,444
16,320
113
33°
www.hoescantstopme.biz
#18
Sanders has my vote. People hear "socialism" and start going nuts, but a majority of the folks I encounter who speak badly about socialism can't even define it. Moreover, Sanders is a Democratic Socialist. If you were to stick him in Europe, he'd be just another run of the mill politician. And the countries that utilize that system are far outperforming the US in a multitude of social and economic categories.
There is nothing wrong with believing in Democratic Socialism if that's what your beliefs align you with, but please give us the countries you are talking about.