I AGREE OR MAYBE I DONT AGREE I AM NOT SURE BECAUSE I DIDNT LOOK AT THE PICTURE IT HAD TOO MANY WORDS AND WASNT REALLY A PICTURE AT ALL. JUST MY 2 CENTS.
I think "evolution" was used in the any process of formation or growth sense, not in the change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift. sense.
Well, what matters in practice is how people who read/view something perceive it.
There is a strong tendency to mix up concepts from evolutionary biology with all sorts of pseudoscientific woo. Even from people who should know better. So I have my BS meter on high alert when I see such things.
Well, what matters in practice is how people who read/view something perceive it.
There is a strong tendency to mix up concepts from evolutionary biology with all sorts of pseudoscientific woo. Even from people who should know better. So I have my BS meter on high alert when I see such things.
I think "evolution" was used in the any process of formation or growth sense, not in the change in the gene pool of a population from generation to generation by such processes as mutation, natural selection, and genetic drift. sense.