Unarmed Teen Shot To Death By Police In St. Louis While His Hands Were Up
- Thread starter InfamousICON
- Start date
The descrip said it was two seconds from the command to raise his hands and the cop firing but I don't know if that's factual or just something that the person who upped the video wrote. I mean there is a decent chance the kid got scared and was going to show them it was only a bb gun or was reaching in his pants to drop it, both which you shouldn't do obviously but we are talking about a 12 year old here, but we will never know seeing the one trigger happy cop basically jumped out of the car while shooting him from like six feet away.
Crazed man dies after resisting TASER, attacking cops | BLUtube
So why didn't that guy get shot?...he shoulda got 12 rounds right?
So why didn't that guy get shot?...he shoulda got 12 rounds right?
What in the actual fuck?
Shocking mistake in Darren Wilson grand jury
That wasn't a mistake at all though, they shouldn't even use mistake in the title. That was blatant manipulation and lying to the grand jury.
Shocking mistake in Darren Wilson grand jury
That wasn't a mistake at all though, they shouldn't even use mistake in the title. That was blatant manipulation and lying to the grand jury.
Last edited:
The cops said they thought he was around 20 apparently......
Video shows Cleveland officer shooting 12-year-old Tamir Rice within seconds - The Washington Post
.... or more likely as the video shows the pigs didn't assess the situation at all and just drove up and hopped out guns blazing.
Video shows Cleveland officer shooting 12-year-old Tamir Rice within seconds - The Washington Post
.... or more likely as the video shows the pigs didn't assess the situation at all and just drove up and hopped out guns blazing.
Last edited:
No the way they approached the situation as trigger happy cops does you are right. Nothing will come of it though of course.
Props:
Rasan and Rasan
http://nypost.com/2014/11/29/why-cnn-wants-you-to-believe-the-ferguson-protests-were-peaceful/
CNN is lying when they say Ferguson protests were ‘peaceful’
By Naomi Schaefer Riley
November 29, 2014 | 7:15pm
Here’s a quiz for you folks in the media: What happens if you’re out doing “man on the street” interviews but none of the men on the street fit your “narrative”?
If you’re CNN, you stop interviewing them.
It has been remarkable to watch the last few days as America’s self-styled “most trusted news network” has sent out teams of reporters to various areas of Ferguson, Mo., ostensibly to cover the protests there. While their cameramen are watching cars on fire and stores being looted, the reporters ramble on about how “most people here” are “peaceful protesters.”
Where are these peaceful protesters? The reporters can’t seem to find any. Instead, they turn to outside experts and some carefully vetted religious leaders to talk about “the real message” of the protests.
On Tuesday night, CNN correspondent Jason Carroll was reporting, “Most of the protesting we saw in front of the Ferguson Police Department tonight was peaceful.” Then as he started trying to explain the fires burning behind him, he was approached by three of the protesters, who proceeded to get in his face and yell at him because he was promoting a “certain narrative” — the police narrative. “You don’t understand!” one screamed.
Anchor Don Lemon quickly went elsewhere, saying he was worried about Carroll’s safety. When Lemon returned to Carroll later in the broadcast and asked him what the men were saying to him, Carroll refused to say. The reporter was stonewalling because, he explained, these men didn’t “represent” the peaceful protesters who were really the story.
CNN’s “narrative” was laid out early on Monday evening as correspondent Van Jones (formerly of the Obama administration) warned the audience not to pay attention to “a few knuckleheads” who later became a “bunch of knuckleheads” who “started a bunch of nonsense.”
Knuckleheads? Nonsense? When did knucklehead become a synonym for arsonist? When did taking a baseball bat to store windows become “a bunch of nonsense?” Talk about defining deviancy down.
On Tuesday night, Lemon even asked Jones about the difficulty they were having in finding peaceful protesters to interview, and Jones replied that “a lot of these young people are on the knife’s edge between violence and nonviolence.” What does that even mean?
Lemon did not ask. Instead, he returned to Marc Lamont Hill, who explained that the problem is not the protesters but the police who have been “disingenuous” by closing off a road to protesters after they heard shots being fired.
Again, he notes that the protesters were very peaceful — and would have remained so if it weren’t for those police officers making people so angry by stifling their voices.
This is a news organization that has lost all sense of its role.
There was even a debate among these knuckleheads — sorry, correspondents — over whether they should have aired video of Michael Brown’s stepfather standing on top of a car yelling, “Burn this bitch down,” right after the verdict was released.
When the Brown family called for peaceful protest, that was reported, but this outburst may not have been newsworthy, according to some of the CNN experts.
Come on. Enough is enough. These were not peaceful protests from the beginning.
Civil disobedience does not happen at night. No matter when the grand jury decision was announced, people who are engaged in peaceful protest take out their signs and march down the street in broad daylight.
Peaceful protesters don’t wear creepy anarchist masks or even bandannas to cover their faces. They are protesting with a clear conscience and are happy to have anyone know their identity.
Peaceful protesters do not dress like they are about to knock over a convenience store because they are not about to knock over a convenience store.
From day one, CNN has twisted the Ferguson story. The network decided early on that an injustice had been done, contrary facts aside. When the grand jury decided not to indict, CNN was primed for outrage, because there was no way officer Darren Wilson could have acted appropriately.
The network helped stir up a nation to the point of violence. Yet, since the protesters must always be on the side of angels, CNN lies about the destruction that follows.
It’s rare you see the liberal media’s dishonesty in such stark terms, but CNN can’t control the pictures. If you wanted to know what was really happening this week, all you had to do was press the mute button.
CNN is lying when they say Ferguson protests were ‘peaceful’
By Naomi Schaefer Riley
November 29, 2014 | 7:15pm
Here’s a quiz for you folks in the media: What happens if you’re out doing “man on the street” interviews but none of the men on the street fit your “narrative”?
If you’re CNN, you stop interviewing them.
It has been remarkable to watch the last few days as America’s self-styled “most trusted news network” has sent out teams of reporters to various areas of Ferguson, Mo., ostensibly to cover the protests there. While their cameramen are watching cars on fire and stores being looted, the reporters ramble on about how “most people here” are “peaceful protesters.”
Where are these peaceful protesters? The reporters can’t seem to find any. Instead, they turn to outside experts and some carefully vetted religious leaders to talk about “the real message” of the protests.
On Tuesday night, CNN correspondent Jason Carroll was reporting, “Most of the protesting we saw in front of the Ferguson Police Department tonight was peaceful.” Then as he started trying to explain the fires burning behind him, he was approached by three of the protesters, who proceeded to get in his face and yell at him because he was promoting a “certain narrative” — the police narrative. “You don’t understand!” one screamed.
Anchor Don Lemon quickly went elsewhere, saying he was worried about Carroll’s safety. When Lemon returned to Carroll later in the broadcast and asked him what the men were saying to him, Carroll refused to say. The reporter was stonewalling because, he explained, these men didn’t “represent” the peaceful protesters who were really the story.
CNN’s “narrative” was laid out early on Monday evening as correspondent Van Jones (formerly of the Obama administration) warned the audience not to pay attention to “a few knuckleheads” who later became a “bunch of knuckleheads” who “started a bunch of nonsense.”
Knuckleheads? Nonsense? When did knucklehead become a synonym for arsonist? When did taking a baseball bat to store windows become “a bunch of nonsense?” Talk about defining deviancy down.
On Tuesday night, Lemon even asked Jones about the difficulty they were having in finding peaceful protesters to interview, and Jones replied that “a lot of these young people are on the knife’s edge between violence and nonviolence.” What does that even mean?
Lemon did not ask. Instead, he returned to Marc Lamont Hill, who explained that the problem is not the protesters but the police who have been “disingenuous” by closing off a road to protesters after they heard shots being fired.
Again, he notes that the protesters were very peaceful — and would have remained so if it weren’t for those police officers making people so angry by stifling their voices.
This is a news organization that has lost all sense of its role.
There was even a debate among these knuckleheads — sorry, correspondents — over whether they should have aired video of Michael Brown’s stepfather standing on top of a car yelling, “Burn this bitch down,” right after the verdict was released.
When the Brown family called for peaceful protest, that was reported, but this outburst may not have been newsworthy, according to some of the CNN experts.
Come on. Enough is enough. These were not peaceful protests from the beginning.
Civil disobedience does not happen at night. No matter when the grand jury decision was announced, people who are engaged in peaceful protest take out their signs and march down the street in broad daylight.
Peaceful protesters don’t wear creepy anarchist masks or even bandannas to cover their faces. They are protesting with a clear conscience and are happy to have anyone know their identity.
Peaceful protesters do not dress like they are about to knock over a convenience store because they are not about to knock over a convenience store.
From day one, CNN has twisted the Ferguson story. The network decided early on that an injustice had been done, contrary facts aside. When the grand jury decided not to indict, CNN was primed for outrage, because there was no way officer Darren Wilson could have acted appropriately.
The network helped stir up a nation to the point of violence. Yet, since the protesters must always be on the side of angels, CNN lies about the destruction that follows.
It’s rare you see the liberal media’s dishonesty in such stark terms, but CNN can’t control the pictures. If you wanted to know what was really happening this week, all you had to do was press the mute button.
theirs no depths to how low and primitive and savage pigs are, here's a exposement of the SWAT team in Ferguson caught doin a false flag in Ferguson, setting fires to frame the protesters
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uT0uaZ5Ymeo
Pigs need to be made to have portable video cameras on them routinely in your country routinely, nationwide, this would force them to pretend there civilised when dealing wit peeps of colour, you get me . Fuck the police
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uT0uaZ5Ymeo
Pigs need to be made to have portable video cameras on them routinely in your country routinely, nationwide, this would force them to pretend there civilised when dealing wit peeps of colour, you get me . Fuck the police
We must have watched two different videos, because i didn't see SWAT starting any fires.
and aren't you that same guy who thinks the world is controlled by shape-shifting reptilians?
and aren't you that same guy who thinks the world is controlled by shape-shifting reptilians?
Props:
jake921660 and jake921660
You're being extra, the video is obvious that SWAT started them fires in the area they had on smash, the truth hurts, reality bites, but it is what it is
Imperialist & corrupt, undercover, closet fascist, control freaks & eugeniscist rule the world
You can call them the system, Babylon, the establishment, military/pharmaceutical/banking/multi national industry complex, illuminati, or reptilian shapeshifters, its neither here or there, believe it, don't believe it, it really dosent matter or change the fact that the world is being ruled by corrupt imperialist, undercover fascists, simple as, simple
Last edited: