LAPD Shoot Man 3 Times In Back While He's Face Down

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Jan 29, 2005
11,578
89,275
113
41
PHX
#1
Yup

LAPD fatally shot an unarmed black man lying face down in the street, say his family

A rally has been organized for Sunday in front of the Los Angeles police headquarters to protest the shooting of an unarmed African-American man, whose family said that he was lying face down in the street when an officer pulled the trigger.

A statement released by the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) on Tuesday said that the incident occurred while an officer was conducting an “investigative stop” on Monday evening at around 8:12 p.m. The statement said that a “struggle ensued,” and the officer opened fire.

The gunshot victim was transported to a nearby hospital, where he later died. Lt. Ellis Imaizumi had initially said on Monday that the officer sustained minor injuries, but the official statement indicated that no officers were hurt during the shooting.

Family of the deceased identified him to KTLA as 24-year-old Ezell Ford. The man’s mother, Tritobia Ford, has described her son as “mentally challenged.”

“My heart is so heavy,” Tritobia Ford told the station. “My son was a good kid. He didn’t deserve to die the way he did.”

A man who identified himself as a cousin said that he was laying down on the pavement, and the officer shot him in the back three times.

“They laid him out and for whatever reason, they shot him in the back, knowing mentally, he has complications,” the man explained. “Every officer in this area, from the Newton Division, knows that — that this child has mental problems.”

“The excessive force … there was no purpose for it. The multiple shootings in the back while he’s laying down? No. Then when the mom comes, they don’t try to console her … they pull the billy clubs out.”

In a statement on Tuesday, Los Angeles Urban Policy Roundtable President Earl Ofari Hutchinson demanded to meet with LAPD Chief Charlie Beck.

“The killing of Ezell Ford — coming on the heels of the Michael Brown killing in Ferguson, Missouri — again raises the issue and problem of tense police-community relations,” the statement asserted. “This is the sole reason we have called for a meeting … to get all the facts in the shooting and for assurances that the shooting will be subject to the most rigorous review to determine if there was any wrongdoing in Ford’s death.”

The LAPD’s Force Investigation Division was investigating the case. Police Chief Charlie Beck, Inspector General Alex Bustamante and the Board of Police Commissioners were expected to determine of if the use of force was “objectively reasonable.”

The officer had been placed on paid administrative leave.
 

DuceTheTruth

No Flexxin No Fakin
Apr 1, 2003
6,884
6,017
1
45
#4
What happened to all that non lethal shit they used to show off back in the day???

If they keep this up shit is NOT going to be cool...


OR...

is there secret legislation that's instructing cops to just start shooting unarmed people....then riots will start...THEN govt calls martial law because the police have no control??

just a thought.

carry on
 
Nov 24, 2003
6,307
3,639
113
#18
A huge part of this problem are the unions. Just like teacher unions are fucking up the ability of our education system to get better.

Seattle has been going through this shit for a while now, and the biggest obstacle to change is the police union.
 
May 7, 2013
13,447
16,320
113
33°
www.hoescantstopme.biz
#19
Mr. Nice Guy @Mr. Nice Guy - If there was no police there would be no police unions. The problem is the existence of the police



The History of the Police

American policing has been heavily influenced by the English system throughout the course of history. In the early stages of development in both England and Colonial America, citizens were responsible for law enforcement in their communities.

The English referred to this as kin police in which people were responsible for watching out for their relatives or kin. In Colonial America, a watch system consisting of citizen volunteers (usually men) was in place until the mid-19th century. Citizens that were part of watch groups provided social services, including lighting street lamps, running soup kitchens, recovering lost children, capturing runaway animals, and a variety of other services; their involvement in crime control activities at this time was minimal at best. Policing in England and Colonial America was largely ineffective, as it was based on a volunteer system and their method of patrol was both disorganized and sporadic.

Sometime later, the responsibility of enforcing laws shifted from individual citizen volunteers to groups of men living within the community; this was referred to as the
frankpledge system in England. The frankpledge system was a semistructured system in which groups of men were responsible for enforcing the law. Men living within a community would form groups of 10 called tythings (or tithings); 10 tythings were then grouped into hundreds, and then hundreds were grouped into shires (similar to counties). A person called the shire reeve (sheriff) was then chosen to be in charge of each shire. The individual members of tythings were responsible for capturing criminals and bringing them to court, while shire reeves were responsible for providing a number of services, including the oversight of the activities conducted by the tythings in their shire.

A similar system existed in America during this time in which constables, sheriffs, and citizen-based watch groups were responsible for policing in the colonies. Sheriffs were responsible for catching criminals, working with the courts, and collecting taxes; law enforcement was not a top priority for sheriffs, as they could make more money by collecting taxes within the community. Night watch groups in Colonial America, as well as day watch groups that were added at a later time, were largely ineffective; instead of controlling crime in their community, some members of the watch groups would sleep and/or socialize while they were on duty. These citizen-based watch groups were not equipped to deal with the increasing social unrest and rioting that were beginning to occur in both England and Colonial America in the late 1700s through the early 1800s.
It was at this point in time that publicly funded police departments began to emerge across both England and Colonial America.

The growth in population also created an increase in social disorder and unrest. The sources of social tension varied across different regions of Colonial America; however, the introduction of new racial and ethnic groups was identified as a common source of discord. Racial and ethnic conflict was a problem across Colonial America, including both the northern and southern regions of the country. Since the watch groups could no longer cope with this change in the social climate, more formalized means of policing began to take shape. Most of the historical literature describing the early development of policing in Colonial America focuses specifically on the northern regions of the country while neglecting events that took place in the southern region—specifically, the creation of slave patrols in the South. Slave patrols first emerged in South Carolina in the early 1700s, but historical documents also identify the existence of slave patrols in most other parts of the southern region. Samuel Walker identified slave patrols as the first publicly funded police agencies in the American South. Slave patrols (or “paddyrollers”) were created to manage the race-based conflict occurring in the southern region of Colonial America; these patrols were created with the specific intent of maintaining control over slave populations. Interestingly, slave patrols would later extend their responsibilities to include control over White indentured servants. Salley Hadden identified three principal duties placed on slave patrols in the South during this time, including searches of slave lodges, keeping slaves off of roadways, and disassembling meetings organized by groups of slaves. Slave patrols were known for their high level of brutality and ruthlessness as they maintained control over the slave population. The members of slave patrols were usually White males (occasionally a few women) from every echelon in the social strata, ranging from very poor individuals to plantation owners that wanted to ensure control over their slaves.

Slave patrols remained in place during the Civil War and were not completely disbanded after slavery ended...[/QUOTE]

irony?

broken record
 
Last edited: