lol I was bored at work last week and The Ring magazine asked fans to send their thoughts of pac-jmm so I sent them an email. I got an email this morning from michael rosenthal of The Ring saying their going to use me for the next Ring Magazine addition. Kinda cool story, breh...
This is what I sent:
I thought it was a great fight which was extremely close just like the prior two. Honestly, it could have gone either way it was so close. Marquez knows how to fight Pacquiao like no other; he went 24 very evenly matched rounds going into the third fight.
Now it appears there are a lot of people screaming robbery. I don't think this was a robbery at all, it was very similar to the second fight - very evenly matched with a lot of difficult rounds to score, minus the knockdown. Everyone already knows judges will typically in close rounds score it for the guy who's busier and lands more, and that's the way I scored it too although a draw would have been just as fine or even a one point victory for Marquez. I had Pacquiao winning by one round.
Closes fights like this you can't call robberies. A robbery is Lara vs Paul Williams or Chavez vs Whitaker. This was yet another razor thin fight just like the past two, which goes to show just how evenly matched Pacquiao & JMM are.
And I'd like people to finally give Marquez the respect he deserves, he's an all time great fighter, period. For whatever reasons, people simply assumed Pacquiao would blow Marquez away, even though he has been the toughest opponent for Pacquiao in a number of years, not to mention he’s never been stopped in his career.
This is what I sent:
I thought it was a great fight which was extremely close just like the prior two. Honestly, it could have gone either way it was so close. Marquez knows how to fight Pacquiao like no other; he went 24 very evenly matched rounds going into the third fight.
Now it appears there are a lot of people screaming robbery. I don't think this was a robbery at all, it was very similar to the second fight - very evenly matched with a lot of difficult rounds to score, minus the knockdown. Everyone already knows judges will typically in close rounds score it for the guy who's busier and lands more, and that's the way I scored it too although a draw would have been just as fine or even a one point victory for Marquez. I had Pacquiao winning by one round.
Closes fights like this you can't call robberies. A robbery is Lara vs Paul Williams or Chavez vs Whitaker. This was yet another razor thin fight just like the past two, which goes to show just how evenly matched Pacquiao & JMM are.
And I'd like people to finally give Marquez the respect he deserves, he's an all time great fighter, period. For whatever reasons, people simply assumed Pacquiao would blow Marquez away, even though he has been the toughest opponent for Pacquiao in a number of years, not to mention he’s never been stopped in his career.