Super Bowl XLIX - New England Patriots vs. Seattle Seahawks

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.

Who will win Super Bowl XLIX?


  • Total voters
    28
  • Poll closed .
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
Take the bet Arson.
I made the terms, and you changed it like a Faggot, YOU TAKE THE BET.
It's called making an agreement. What I ask is simple. Especially considering you had this to say in the niner thread:

How about you wait to post in our thread till you guys come play us at home, and lose for the 6th year in a row?
Hypocrite. We can even add $350 to this bet. Like you said earlier, "put your money where your mouth is". Well here you go, cash and a chance to shut me up for good. All you gotta to do is agree to not post in the Seahawks thread, that's it, which again is something you ASKED us Seahawks fan to do in the niner thread.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
I didn't see that throw from that angle, I honestly think that was a bit of a poorly run route. Granted, Wilson shouldn't have thrown the ball, but the receiver should have cut much closer to where the linebackers had lined up. That route is supposed to take the DB completely out of the play. The only way that pass doesn't work is if the LB stays back as a spy or is in coverage. The LB blitzed. The receiver should have had an easy TD. Or an in and out route would've worked perfectly with that pick that was set up. But, it's a game of inches as they say.
This was the look Wilson had:



After looking at this, it's just an amazing jump on the ball by the Pats. Hats off to them, hell of a play. The key to this play is Browner, you see him jamming Kearse. If he doesn't jam and Kearse gets free, Lockett makes that catch 100% of the time, TD game over. It was a great great defensive play.

But they should have never called that play. The amount of times the Seahawks have ran a slant with Lockett from goal line this year - zero (until yesterday of course). If they are going to pass there, that play makes no sense whatsoever. You go with your bread and butter - let Wilson roll out and have the option to try and run it in, hit a WR/TE on an out, or throw it away. Not a quick slant across the middle in front of traffic with a guy you seldom use. It's not that crazy they passed there even though the obvious thing to do is handoff to lynch, it's the play they called that's really crazy.
 
Last edited:
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
The Seahawks face some serious challenges with payroll for this upcoming season, likely face a more difficult schedule (something that the 49ers have had to deal with after so much success the last few years that everyone overlooks) and that's basically what kills any good team, which is what makes what the Patriots have done that much more impressive.
Don't forget the Seahawks had one of the toughest schedules this season because they won the superbowl last year. They got through it 12-4.

But this is what we'll have:

HOME: Chi, Det, Cle, Pit, Carolina, NFC West
AWAY: GB, Min, Bal, Cin, Dallas, NFC West
 
May 7, 2013
13,360
16,263
113
33°
www.hoescantstopme.biz
This was the look Wilson had:



After looking at this, it's just an amazing jump on the ball by the Pats. Hats off to them, hell of a play.
Yes, Butler made a great play. Wilson failed- should have scoped Butler before the throw. The OC chose to make the wrong call, you run the ball. I ride with the Hawks but that was a fail on both their parts. Lynch should leave on GP, respect for his professional comment tho.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
Carroll already had that play locked and loaded when Kearse made that catch. He was going to try a pass on 2nd and then run on 3rd.
Right he wanted a pass but that's the play Bevell called. And he basically threw Lockett under the bus. Pete took responsibility. Wilson takes responsibility. Bevell says Locket could have made a better play on the ball. One of those three isn't the same. Tired of Bevell.
 
May 9, 2002
37,066
16,282
113
Right he wanted a pass but that's the play Bevell called. And he basically threw Lockett under the bus. Pete took responsibility. Wilson takes responsibility. Bevell says Locket could have made a better play on the ball. One of those three isn't the same. Tired of Bevell.
That goes without saying. YOu see me on here hollering for his head for the last 2 years, breh.
 

7-1-3 Click

smalltown'n
Jun 24, 2003
722
230
43
37
They're complaining that many fans of other teams are trolling them..

This is a well deserved trolling.. They had it coming for thinking they're superior..

One and done!
man, you're just hating, all through this thread...the fuck outta here!! mad cuz the last time y'all won a superbowl, jerry rice rocked a flat top g.

was a great game. from the beginning. the the fight at the end. lol...
people blame the offensive cordinator? rrreeally? im pretty sure the head coach can override ANY play and has the final say in pretty much everything
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
man, you're just hating, all through this thread...the fuck outta here!! mad cuz the last time y'all won a superbowl, jerry rice rocked a flat top g.

was a great game. from the beginning. the the fight at the end. lol...
people blame the offensive cordinator? rrreeally? im pretty sure the head coach can override ANY play and has the final say in pretty much everything
Right he wanted a pass with that defense the Pats presented, I don't have a huge problem with that the issue I have is the play Bevell called. Like I said above they ran a quick slant route to Lockette a total times of never this year on goal line situations. I'd obviously prefer a run but if you're going to pass there make sure it's a safe option, something on the sideline only a WR can get while giving Wilson the option to run or throw it away. Passing on second down isn't really terrible, the play they selected was.
 

Arson

Long live the KING!!!!
May 7, 2002
15,796
10,860
113
You'll pass the drug tests that you have a prescription for, sure, don't act like you didn't write "if I fail a drug test it's straight to jail for me" lol c'mon son! You're a hypocrite talking about drugs when you're a junkie yourself. Like I said though, Seahawks had zero failed drug tests this season so obviously I wouldn't worry about that whatsoever. The last guy from the secondary to have a drug suspension was Browner, who's now on the Pats who you were just praising, hypocrite.
I dont have any "scripts".
 

Coach E. No

Jesus es Numero Uno
Mar 30, 2013
4,191
7,800
113
This was the look Wilson had:



After looking at this, it's just an amazing jump on the ball by the Pats. Hats off to them, hell of a play. The key to this play is Browner, you see him jamming Kearse. If he doesn't jam and Kearse gets free, Lockett makes that catch 100% of the time, TD game over. It was a great great defensive play.

But they should have never called that play. The amount of times the Seahawks have ran a slant with Lockett from goal line this year - zero (until yesterday of course). If they are going to pass there, that play makes no sense whatsoever. You go with your bread and butter - let Wilson roll out and have the option to try and run it in, hit a WR/TE on an out, or throw it away. Not a quick slant across the middle in front of traffic with a guy you seldom use. It's not that crazy they passed there even though the obvious thing to do is handoff to lynch, it's the play they called that's really crazy.
That's a good look at it and I agree with some of what you're saying but I stand by what I said. A good receiver uses everything going on to make the play and if that ball is thrown a little better, the odds of it being picked off are lower. It was a bad route and a bad throw in that situation. But I think we all agree, I liked Marshawn's odds of running it a lot more than this play, or even an in and out route with that pick is so much smarter than going into the teeth of a goal line defense with everyone stacked in the middle.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,801
113
44
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
That's a good look at it and I agree with some of what you're saying but I stand by what I said. A good receiver uses everything going on to make the play and if that ball is thrown a little better, the odds of it being picked off are lower. It was a bad route and a bad throw in that situation. But I think we all agree, I liked Marshawn's odds of running it a lot more than this play, or even an in and out route with that pick is so much smarter than going into the teeth of a goal line defense with everyone stacked in the middle.
Right there are 100 plays that are better than this one and like I said Lockette is rarely used, you'd imagine Doug Baldwin or someone else, it's just a bizarre play to run in that scenario.
 

Coach E. No

Jesus es Numero Uno
Mar 30, 2013
4,191
7,800
113
if Russell didn't hesitate when he got the snap for that split second it might of been completed but bizarre play I agree

it was a great game to watch though
Yeah, I was gonna say that too. That Throw should've been a 1-2 step drop at best but I wondered if that was partially due to his height. I know he's been great thus far in his career but there is a reason why shorter QB's have an issue. Brady or Manning likely could've made that throw much easier than Wilson. That throw HAS to be thrown at a downward angle. If you'll also notice, if he waited even another second longer, the linebacker could've made a play on the ball as well.