Boxing schedule for the month of March

  • Wanna Join? New users you can now register lightning fast using your Facebook or Twitter accounts.
Feb 10, 2006
2,018
982
113
42
I can accept this post, but you seem to admit it's hard to score and depends largely on what the person scoring is impressed more by, so that should indicate you're fine with the decision, right? What I hate is when I see people scream robbery but then say rounds are hella hard to score and can go either way (you didn't do this I'm just saying i read people making these kinds of statements on otjer forums).

I'd like to see a rematch next if the Canelo fight can't happen yet. I think if Canelo is available he must take it, for so many reasons, but Jacobs fought with a lot of heart and should get a rematch, just like Maidana against Floyd (different styles completely but both fought with a lot of passion). It's just Canelo is a more important fight and Golovkin isn't getting any younger, he turns 35 in a few weeks (April 8th). I think he wants Canelo/Jacobs/Saunders then retire, although I haven't heard Golovkin say it just hinted the time is near.
That was exactly my point. I just went off about how Box Nation had it and how Azteca had it. I don't like to score rounds because that is very hard for me to do as far as not being biased round for round. I prefer to watch fights like a casual because I'm not a judge, just a fan.
 
Feb 10, 2006
2,018
982
113
42
I'm pissed off thinking about Canelo vs GGG. GBP have said that if GGG fights Saunders in june then there is no fight in September due to promotional duties. I see Canelo vs Lemieux in September, GGG vs Saunders then maybe Lara, and Jacobs vs a bum
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,800
113
43
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
I'm pissed off thinking about Canelo vs GGG. GBP have said that if GGG fights Saunders in june then there is no fight in September due to promotional duties. I see Canelo vs Lemieux in September, GGG vs Saunders then maybe Lara, and Jacobs vs a bum
Oscar said today after Golovkins performance against Jacobs the chances of a Canelo fight decreased. Lol this motherfucker man. Basically saying because Golovkin struggled to beat Jacobs the fight isn't as important. As if Canelo never struggled with a fighter before. Fuck Oscar man. But hopefully he's trolling or high. A Saunders fight won't make a difference since Golovkin would be fighting Saunders in less than three months and want to fight again in September.
 
May 13, 2002
49,944
47,800
113
43
Seattle
www.socialistworld.net
Hopefully Canelo does so now they can actually fight. Do people really think that Canelo goes out there and washes Jacobs?
Right? Let alone actually fight Jacobs.

I think some people are ignoring the fact that Jacobs just proved he's a damn good middleweight. That should be more of the narrative versus Golovkin narrowly won.
 
Feb 10, 2006
2,018
982
113
42
Oscar said today after Golovkins performance against Jacobs the chances of a Canelo fight decreased. Lol this motherfucker man. Basically saying because Golovkin struggled to beat Jacobs the fight isn't as important. As if Canelo never struggled with a fighter before. Fuck Oscar man. But hopefully he's trolling or high. A Saunders fight won't make a difference since Golovkin would be fighting Saunders in less than three months and want to fight again in September.
He's just saying that so GGG won't fight Saunders and take the flat fee for the Canelo fight. If the reported 150k ppv buys for the GGG vs Jacobs fight are true, and Canelo vs Chavez get 1 mill, Canelo vs GGG will definitely not happen. GGG should have just fought Canelo at catchweight last year. He's obviously the better boxer so no matter what he would have won. He would have fought Saunders to get all the titles instead of fighting Jacobs, then moved up to 168 and fight Chavez this September.