WHY DONT YALL GET ALL RAIDEDS PAST AND PRESENT RELEASES CHOPPED AND SCREWED........MY HOMIE SCREWED SOME OF HIS SHIT AND ITS SO FUCKIN TIGHT.....FREE X-LOC!!!!!!!!
HOW BOUT THIS........... ILL SCREW THE ALBUMS AND EMAIL THEM TO YOU. YOU DO WHAT YOU WANT FROM THERE. BUT AT LEAST LISTEN CUZ I WOULD BUY A RAIDED CHOPPED AND SCREWED ALBUM IF IT HAD LIKE 3-4 NEW CUTS ON IT........ YADIDIMEAN!
Raided's old beats where fuccin filthy. But than Big hollis came into picture and fucced up his beats bad. Im probly only feelin 5 beats done by Hollis. But shit X-raided rips any beat ta shreads anyway so fucc it
sometimes the production is so bland and weak that i would prefer to just hear raided spit acapella..cuz dude always got some real shit to say...beats gotta be parallel with the vocals
i agree that hollis beats on raided new shit were trash and the old beats were the best, the first 3 - psycho active, xorcist, and unforgiven had the siccest beats
sometimes the production is so bland and weak that i would prefer to just hear raided spit acapella..cuz dude always got some real shit to say...beats gotta be parallel with the vocals
i agree completely, i think raided needs more beats like the one on "whatever it took". and i actually liked the hollis production, X's old beats wouldn't have worked with Kingpen's style i don't think. but for the slower songs raided needs beats like on the song's "jelous fellas" and "hellraiser" (the one on "and he shall apear")
in my opinion every album had tight beats EXCEPT SAC A DA INDO.....it had a couple of knoccers but it seemed like hollis used the same beat like"write what i see" about 3 times on city of kings :sac a da indo... the production on that CD was bammer i think...EXORCIST had the tight beats for sure